United States
Securities and Exchange Commission

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DCD.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment (Amendment No.   )

  Filed by the Registrant  Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrant  ý                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, For Usefor use of the Commission Onlyonly (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ýDefinitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material underPursuant to §240.14a-12

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure

Capital, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
ýNo fee required.required
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.0-11

LETTER FROM THE
EXECUTIVE CHAIR

Dear Stakeholders:

I went back over my prior annual report letters to see how well they have told our story over these last 10 years, which is summarized below in five passages from those letters and three graphics.

We went public to offer investors a unique opportunity to earn superior risk-adjusted returns… investing in the enormous de-carbonization market… the defining issue of our time.

Our clients create these innovative engineered solutions… using our capital to ensure that economical assets are adopted at scale… waste less, are more diversified and reduce social friction.

We have built the business to prosper in various interest rate and commodity market environments… as well as public policy support.

Our goal was to set the ‘gold standard’ for ESG…to produce tangible shareholder value…with rigorous carbon reporting… high employee retention…by embracing our broader ethos as a responsible corporate citizen.

Make no mistake we are losing the battle on climate change…17 of the 18 warmest years occurred since 2001.

Our vision has been unwavering and successful. We have stayed true to the mission of earning superior risk-adjusted returns investing on the right side of the climate change line. Although volatility in the capital markets has recently caused this success not to be reflected in our share price, our long-term total annual shareholder return of 14%1 over the last 10 years still beats the S&P 500 over the same period. As our Investor Day in March showed, our expanded leadership team, led by Jeff Lipson, will continue to grow the business responsibly, produce superior returns, and maintain a commitment to the gold standard of corporate citizenship.

2022 Review and Outlook for 2023

We closed more than $1.8 billion in climate solutions investments in 2022, and grew our portfolio by 19% with a corresponding increase in Distributable Net Investment Income of 34%. As a result, HASI continued its strong financial performance in 2022, increasing Distributable Earnings per Share by 11%.

One of the key reasons that we have successfully grown our portfolio is that our strategy incorporates multiple asset classes. If we were reliant on a single asset class, our growth would unlikely be as consistent.

Our newly rebranded FTN (Fuels, Transport & Nature) segment is providing further diversification and strong returns and complements our GC (Grid-Connected) and BTM (Behind-the-Meter) segments.

This diversity is the result of a significant number of clients that we work closely with, many of them involved in multiple asset classes, as well as our ability to pivot towards new opportunities quickly.

Likewise, our 12-month pipeline of greater than $4.5 billion is well balanced as our BTM pipeline is benefiting from increasing utility rates, our GC pipeline is primarily solar

(1)Estimated as of March 31, 2023.

opportunities, and our FTN pipeline is mostly RNG, fleet decarbonization and ecological restoration. This balanced profile allows investors to participate across the entire clean energy transition market.

The business outlook is the brightest it has ever been. The energy transition to a lower carbon world is accelerating with supportive public policy. The Inflation Reduction Act will positively affect our business as evidenced by our clients increasing their pipelines due to the long-term ITC/PTC policy certainty and tax credits for renewable fuels. Tax credits for battery storage have made standalone projects conducive for investment, an example of policy accelerating new, investable asset classes for us. Transferability of tax credits will expand the tax capacity available for renewable projects, as well as provide an opportunity for us to participate in those transactions. And finally, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the CHIPS and Science Act provide a constructive policy backdrop for new transmission and onshoring manufacturing. In my over 40-year career, I never imagined this level and duration of policy support for the energy transition. This is unmitigated good news for HASI.

Because of this policy backdrop, our clients’ aspirations are expanding, and we believe our tenured participation in this industry positions us well for continued programmatic investment with our top-tier client base. HASI has a proven strategy, executed by a mission-driven team committed to not only producing superior risk-adjusted returns, but also making a meaningful difference on climate.

ESG Progress

2022 marked the year that investors and regulators rightfully began to seriously demand standardization, rigor, and transparency in ESG initiatives and reporting. Thankfully, HASI has been at the vanguard of these efforts since our IPO.

At HASI, we embed our purpose into our corporate mission: Every investment improves our climate future. This ensures ESG is a core aspect of our process – not an incidental byproduct. As a result, our thoughtful and rigorous ESG strategy focuses on issues most material to our business. We’ve made significant progress on each of the ESG fronts.

On the environmental front, we revamped our industry-leading CarbonCount metric to incorporate real-time emissions factors, ensuring we measure, report, and understand the carbon emissions avoided by each and every one of our investments. This level of precision positions us in a class of our own among publicly traded U.S. financial institutions. In addition, with other leading corporates, we co-founded the Emissions First Partnership to improve corporate and investor emissions accounting by moving beyond megawatt-hour matching and focusing more on quantified emissions impact.

Recently, Maryland’s new Governor Wes Moore was asked if he had appointed a historically diverse cabinet to “try to make a point.” He replied, “No. I want to win.”2 There is strength, wisdom, and competitive advantage in diversity and HASI continues to drive diversity and inclusivity within our workforce. Further, we established Business Resource Groups to foster support and mentorship among our employees, prosperity that will benefit them and ultimately our shareholders. The HASI Foundation expanded its reach and capability with the appointment of external Board members and made an impact at the intersection of climate change and social justice with over ten generous grants.

Finally, we continued to enhance our corporate governance by separating the CEO and Chair roles and adding new directors to our board. Now, a majority of our independent directors comprise women and persons of color – exceedingly rare for US public companies.

To our mission-driven team, all of these accomplishments were essential to growing the long-term shareholder value reflective of the significant value we created for our clients, employees, and community – indeed, all of our stakeholders. We remain enormously proud of our team and our ability to grow our business while also making the world a better place.

Conclusion

HASI is in the best market, with the best clients, deploying the best business model. Do we have the best team? To paraphrase Governor Moore: I want to win, and I’d hate to compete with us. I thank this team for their intelligence, their hard work and commitment to the company mission.

Respectfully,

Jeffrey W. Eckel
Executive Chair
April 2023

(2)Governor Wes Moore’s comments on March 27, 2023 to an audience at the Governor’s Mansion assembled for Women’s History Month, attended by myself.

NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL

MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

When

June 7, 2023

9:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Where

The meeting will be held via a live webcast at

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023
(password: enter your 16 digit control number)

Record Date

Close of business on

April 12, 2023

How to Vote
ONLINE   

1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:



2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:







3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth

(During the amount on whichAnnual Meeting)

Access

www.virtualshareholdermeeting ..com/HASI2023 (password: your 16 digit control number) and following the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 




4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:



5)

Total fee paid:


on-screen instructions.

 

(Before the Annual Meeting)

Go to www.proxyvote.com to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
MAIL TELEPHONE
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

1)

Amount previously paid: 


 

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: 



3)

Filing Party:



4)

Date Filed:





NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 4, 2020
To the Stockholders of Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.:
The 2020 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held via a live webcast at http://web.lumiagm.com/259337958 (password: hannon2020) on June 4, 2020, beginning at 9:30 am, Eastern time, to consider and vote on the following matters:
(1)The election of seven directors1-800-690-6903. Use any touch- tone telephone to serve ontransmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern time the Company’s board of directors until the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify;
(2)The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020;
(3)A non-binding advisory resolution to approve our executive compensation as more fully set forth in the accompanying proxy statement; and
(4)The transaction of such other business as may properly comeday before the Annual Meetingcut-off date or any postponements or adjournments thereof.meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 9, 2020 (the “Record Date”). The Notice contains instructions for your use of this process, including how to access our proxy statement and annual report over the Internet, how to authorize your proxy to vote online and how to request a paper copy of the proxy statement and annual report.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, which will be conducted via a live webcast.virtually. By hosting the Annual Meeting online, we are able to communicate more effectively with our stockholders, enable increased attendance and participation from locations around the world, and reduce costs, which aligns with our broader sustainability goals. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. Online check-in will begin at 9:15 a.m., Eastern time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. During the upcoming virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares online from your home or any remote location with Internet connectivity. We will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows.


If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, you will need the control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials.
Items to be voted on:
1Elect eleven director nominees to serve on the Company’s board of directors
2Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023
3Provide non-binding advisory approval of our executive compensation
4The frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation
5Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof

The Annual Meeting will begin online promptly at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time. Online check-in will begin at 9:00 a.m., Eastern time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures.


It is very important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You may authorize your proxy to vote your shares over the Internet as described in the Notice. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the proxy card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. You may also vote by telephone as described in your proxy card. If you authorize a proxy to vote your shares over the Internet, by mail or by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting, you may nevertheless revoke your proxy and cast your vote online during the virtual meeting.




Your proxy is being solicited by our board of directors. Our board of directors recommends that you vote (1) FOR the election of the nominees listed in the accompanyingattached proxy statement to serve on our board of directors until our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify, (2) FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, and (3) FOR the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in our proxy statement.
By Order of our Board of Directors,
/s/ Jeffrey W. Eckel
Jeffrey W. Eckel
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Steven L. Chuslo
Steven L. Chuslo
Secretary

Annapolis, Maryland
April 14, 2020
describes these items.

Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held June 4, 2020. The7, 2023.

Our notice of annual meeting, proxy statement and our 20192022 Annual
Report on Form 10-K are available at: http:

www.proxyvote.com

and

www.investors.HASI.com

By Order of our Board of Directors,

//investors.hannonarmstrong.com s/ Steven L. Chuslo
Steven L. Chuslo

Secretary

Annapolis, Maryland
April 19, 2023


HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY6
Meeting Agenda6
Director Nominees6
Director Highlights7
Governance Highlights7
Compensation Highlights7
RECENTHIGHLIGHTS8
GROWTHHIGHLIGHTS9
PROXY STATEMENTFOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 7, 202310
PROPOSAL NO. 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS10
Information about the Director Nominees11
Skills, Expertise and Attributes15
Identification of Director Candidates16
Majority Vote Policy16
Vacancies16
Voting on Director Nominees17
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCESTRUCTURE18
Corporate Governance Philosophy18
Our Board of Directors19
ESG Oversight23
Corporate Governance Policies and Review25
Active Stockholder Outreach26
Management Succession Planning26
Communications with our Board of Directors26
CLIMATE LEADERSHIP27
TCFD Metrics and Targets28
Science-Based Targets Initiative29
HASI Internal Carbon Price30
Green Debt Leadership32
CarbonCount 2.0 Greater Accuracy, Granularity of Emissions Modeling33
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY34
Human Rights34
Business Partner ESG Engagement35
Corporate Policy Updates35
OUR PEOPLE36
Engaging with Our Team36
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice and Anti-Racism (DEIJA)36
Health and Well-Being38
Skills for the Future39
Engagement39
Recruitment and Hiring40
Fair and Competitive Compensation40
COMPENSATION OFINDEPENDENT DIRECTORS41
Annual Compensation41
Other Compensation41
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Independent Directors41
Changes to our Director Compensation for 202341
Compensation Committee Review41
Director Compensation Table for 202242
PROPOSAL NO. 2RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM43
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees43
Report of the Audit Committee44
PROPOSAL NO. 3STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION45
INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS47
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION48
Compensation Discussion and Analysis48
Executive Summary48
Our Executive Compensation Program Best Practices50
Process for Setting Executive Compensation50
Executive Compensation Program Components52
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation56
Adjustment or Recovery of Awards57
Relationship of Compensation Practices to Risk Management57
Compensation Committee Report57
2022 Summary Compensation Table58
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 202259
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table59
2022 PLAN SUMMARY62
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year End65
2022 Option Exercises and Securities Vested66
Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation67
CEO Compensation Pay Ratio68
2022 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE68
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers72
PROPOSAL NO. 4STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION73
Required Vote73
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS ANDMANAGEMENT74
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS ANDRELATED TRANSACTIONS76
Indemnification Agreements for Officers and Directors76
MEETINGINFORMATION76
ANNUALREPORT77
VOTING SECURITIES ANDRECORD DATE77
OTHERMATTERS78
OUTSTANDINGSHARES78
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS78
MISCELLANEOUS79

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  5

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information from this Proxy Statement, but does not contain all the information that you should consider. Please read the entire Proxy Statement before voting your shares. For more complete information regarding our 2022 performance, please review our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

WhenWhereRecord Date
June 7, 2023
9:30 a.m. Eastern Time
The meeting will be held via a live webcast at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023
(password: enter your 16 digit control number)
Close of business on
April 12, 2023

MEETING AGENDA

The matters we will act upon at the Annual Meeting are:

PROPOSALBOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDATION
More
information
Elect eleven director nominees to serve on our board of directors until the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualifyFORall nominees listed belowPage 10
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023FORPage 43
Approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officersFORPage 45
Approve, on a non-binding basis, the option of “One” year as the frequency for future advisory votes on compensation of our Named Executive OfficersFOR “One” year frequencyPage 73

DIRECTOR NOMINEES1

Name Age Independent Principal occupation Committees Other
public
boards
 Director since
Jeffrey W. Eckel
Executive Chair
 64   Former Chief Executive Officer & President, Hannon  Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.   0 Executive Chair since March 2023; Chair from  2013 to February 2023; Director since 2013
Jeffrey A. Lipson
Chief Executive Officer
 55   Chief Executive Officer & President, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.   0 2023
Teresa M. Brenner
Lead Independent Director
 59  Former Managing Director & Associate General Counsel, Bank of America Corporation Compensation,  NGCR (Chair) 0 Lead Independent Director since 2019; Director since 2016
Lizabeth A. Ardisana 72  Chief Executive Officer & Principal Owner, ASG Renaissance, LLC Compensation, NGCR 2 2022
Clarence D. Armbrister 65  President, Johnson C. Smith University NGCR, Finance and Risk 0 2021
Michael T. Eckhart 74  Clinical Professor of Sustainable Finance, University of Maryland Adjunct Professor of Environmental Finance, Columbia University NGCR, Finance and Risk 0 2019
Nancy C. Floyd 68  Former Managing Director, Nth Power LLC Audit, Finance and Risk 1 2021
Charles M. O’Neil 70  Former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the  Board, ING Capital, LLC Finance and Risk (Chair), NGCR 0 2013
Richard J. Osborne 72  Former Chief Financial Officer, Duke Energy Corporation Audit, Compensation (Chair) 0 2013
Steven G. Osgood 66  Chief Executive Officer, Square Foot Companies, LLC Audit (Chair), Compensation 1 2015
Kimberly A. Reed 52  Former Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Export-Import Bank of the United States Audit, Finance and Risk 2 2023

(1)Furnished as of April 12, 2023.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  6

DIRECTOR HIGHLIGHTS

Our board of directors exhibits a strong mix of desired attributes, including business experience, tenure, age, diversity and independence. Five of eleven current directors standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting have joined our board of directors since 2019, four of whom are independent directors. The following is a snapshot of some key characteristics of our board of directors immediately following the Annual Meeting assuming all nominees are elected.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Separate Chair and CEOOn March 1, 2023, we separated the roles of chair and chief executive officer
ESG GovernanceRobust oversight structure covering our strategies, activities, and policies including our Sustainability Investment Policy, Environmental Policies, and Human Rights and Human Capital Management Policies
Commitment to DEIJAWomen and racially diverse directors constitute a majority of our independent directors

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Pay for Performance PhilosophyExecutive compensation encourages and rewards strong financial and operational performance
Implicit Link to ESG PerformanceExecutive compensation is implicitly linked to ESG performance due to our focus on investments in climate solutions, which drive growth in key compensation-linked financial metrics
CEO Pay RatioFor 2022, the compensation for our chief executive officer was 30x the compensation of our median employee

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  7

RECENT
HIGHLIGHTS

Key Performance Indicators

  FY22FY21Growth (YOY)
EPS GAAP-based$0.47$1.51 
Distributable1$2.08$1.88+11%
NII GAAP-based$45m$11m 
Distributable1$180m$134m+34%
Portfolio Yield1 7.5%7.5% 
Portfolio2 $4.3b$3.6b+19%
Managed Assets1 $9.8b$8.8b 
Distributable ROE3 11.4%11.2% 
Pipeline >$4.5b>$4b 
Transactions Closed $1.8b$1.7b 

Affirmed Current Guidance through 2024

(1)See Item 7 to our Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2023 with the SEC, for an explanation of Distributable Earnings, Distributable Net Investment Income, Portfolio Yield and Managed Assets, including reconciliations to the relevant GAAP measures, where applicable.
(2)GAAP-based.
(3)Distributable ROE is calculated using Distributable Earnings for the period and the average of the quarterly ending equity balances for the period.
(4)CarbonCount is a scoring tool that evaluates investments in U.S.-based energy efficiency and renewable energy projects to estimate the expected CO2 emission reduction per $1,000 of investment.
(5)WaterCount is a scoring tool that evaluates investments in U.S.-based projects to estimate the expected water consumption reduction per $1,000 of investment.
(6)Relative to the 2020 baseline.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  8

GROWTH
HIGHLIGHTS

(1)See Item 7 to our Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2023 with the SEC, for an explanation of Distributable Earnings, Distributable Net Investment Income, Portfolio Yield and Managed Assets, including reconciliations to the relevant GAAP measures, where applicable.
(2)Excludes incremental interest expense related to debt prepayments.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  9

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 4, 2020
7, 2023

This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the board of directors of Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company,“Company,we,“we,our“our” or us“us”), for use at the Company’s 20202023 annual meeting of stockholders (the Annual Meeting“Annual Meeting”) to be held via a live webcast at http://web.lumiagm.com/259337958(password: hannon2020) www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023 (password: enter your 16-digit control number) on June 4, 2020,7, 2023, at 9:30 am, Eastern time, or at any postponements or adjournments thereof.

MEETING INFORMATION
Pursuant to the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, (the “Notice”) to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 9, 2020 (the "Record Date"). We believe that posting these materials on the Internet enables us to provide stockholders with the information that they need more quickly. It also lowers our costs of printing and delivering these materials and reduces the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. The Notice and this proxy statement summarize the information you need to know to vote by proxy or online during the Annual Meeting via a live webcast.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, which will be conducted via a live webcast. By hosting the Annual Meeting online, we are able to communicate more effectively with our stockholders, enable increased attendance and participation from locations around the world, and reduce costs, which aligns with our broader sustainability goals. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. During the upcoming virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares online from your home or any remote location with Internet connectivity. We will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, you will need the control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time. Online check-in will begin at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures.

You may attend the virtual Annual Meeting if you are a stockholder of record, a proxy holder for a stockholder of record, or a beneficial owner of our common stock with evidence of ownership.

If you are a registered holder of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), as of the close of business on the Record Date, the Notice was sent directly to you and you may vote your shares of Common Stock during the meeting by attending via live webcast. If you hold shares of Common Stock in “street name” through a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary, the Notice was forwarded to you by such intermediary and you must follow the instructions provided by such intermediary regarding how to instruct such intermediary to vote your shares of Common Stock.
Shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies received by us prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted according to the instructions specified on such proxies. Any stockholder of record submitting a proxy retains the power to revoke such proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our secretary at Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., 1906 Towne Centre Boulevard, Suite 370, Annapolis, MD 21401 prior to the Annual Meeting, (ii) submitting a later dated proxy or (iii) voting online during the meeting via live webcast. Attending the Annual Meeting via webcast will not automatically revoke a stockholder’s previously submitted proxy unless such stockholder votes online during the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name and you desire to vote online during the virtual Annual Meeting, you must first obtain a valid legal proxy from your broker, bank or other agent and then register in advance to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a legal proxy form. After obtaining a valid legal proxy from your broker, bank or other agent, to then register to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you must submit proof of your legal proxy reflecting the number of your shares along with your name and email address to American


Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. Requests for registration should be directed (i) to proxy@astfinancial.com, (ii) to facsimile number 718-765-8730, or (iii) written requests mailed to:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC
Attn: Proxy Tabulation Department
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219

Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 28, 2020. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials. You may attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote your shares during the meeting at http://web.lumiagm.com/259337958 by using the password hannon2020 and following the instructions provided to vote. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for the check in.

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please access the frequently asked questions portal online at https://go.lumiglobal.com/faq.
If your shares are held in street name and you desire to change your vote, you should contact the nominee holding shares for you (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) for instructions on how to do so. If a proxy is properly authorized without specifying any voting instructions and not revoked prior to the Annual Meeting, the shares of Common Stock represented by such proxy will be voted (1) FOR the election of the nominees named in this proxy statement as directors, to serve on our board of directors until our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (2) FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 and (3) FOR the approval of a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in this proxy statement. If you hold your shares in street name and do not give the nominee holding shares for you (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) specific voting instructions on the election of directors or the non-binding advisory vote to approve our executive compensation, your shares will not be voted on these items, and a broker non-vote will occur. Broker non-votes and abstentions are each included in the determination of the number of shares of Common Stock present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but will have no effect on the voting results for any of the proposals.As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.
This proxy statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the related proxy card are first being made available to stockholders on or about April 14, 2020.
ANNUAL REPORT
This proxy statement is accompanied by our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020 as supplemented by the Form 10-K/A (excluding exhibits), filed with the SEC on March 27, 2020, collectively, the “Form 10-K”.


VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE
Stockholders will be entitled to cast one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record at the close of business on the Record Date, April 9, 2020, with respect to (i) the election of seven directors to serve on our board of directors until our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, (iii) a non-binding advisory resolution approving compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in this proxy statement and (iv) any other proposal for stockholder action that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.
Stockholders who instruct their proxy to abstain, abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of stockholders present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) returns a properly-executed proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because such nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular matter and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the only item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting with respect to which such nominee will be permitted to exercise voting discretion is the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. Therefore, if you hold your shares in street name and do not give the nominee specific voting instructions on the election of directors or the non-binding advisory resolution approving our executive compensation, your shares will not be voted on these items, and a broker non-vote will occur. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the voting results for any of the proposals.
The presence, by attending online during the Annual Meeting via webcast or by proxy, of holders of Common Stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum. The disposition of business scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present, will require the following affirmative votes:
for the election of a director, a plurality of all the votes cast in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting,
for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, a majority of all the votes cast on the proposal and
for the approval of the non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, a majority of all the votes cast on the proposal.
The vote on compensation is advisory and not binding on our board of directors. However, our board of directors and the Compensation Committee value all stockholder feedback and will consider the outcome of the votes in reviewing executive compensation.
Our board of directors knows of no other matters that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly introduced, the persons named in the proxy as the proxy holders will vote on such matters in their discretion. If any nominee named in this proxy statement is unwilling or unable to serve as a director, our board of directors may nominate another individual for election as a director at the Annual Meeting, and the persons named as proxy holders will vote for the election of any substitute nominee.
As of April 9, 2020, we had issued and outstanding 72,538,046 shares of Common Stock (which includes 459,571 shares of unvested restricted Common Stock).


1.

PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

Our board of directors is currently comprised of seveneleven directors: Jeffrey W. Eckel, Jeffrey A. Lipson, Lizabeth A. Ardisana, Clarence D. Armbrister, Teresa M. Brenner, Michael T. Eckhart, Simone F. Lagomarsino,Nancy C. Floyd, Charles M. O’Neil, Richard J. Osborne, and Steven G. Osgood.Osgood and Kimberly A. Reed (the “director nominees”). In accordance with our charter (the Charter“Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the Bylaws“Bylaws”), each director willexcept Mses. Ardisana and Reed and Mr. Lipson was elected at the 2022 Annual Meeting to hold office until ourthe next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies, or until the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. In accordance with the Charter and Bylaws, in October 2022, the size of our Board was increased from eight to nine and Ms. Ardisana was appointed to fill the resulting vacancy. In March 2023, the size of our Board was increased from nine to eleven and Mr. Lipson and Ms. Reed were appointed to fill the resulting vacancies. Each of the newly appointed directors was appointed to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies, or until his or her earlier resignation, death or removal. See “—Identification of Director Candidates” and “—Vacancies.”

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee of our board of directors (the “NGCR Committee”), our board of directors has nominated our current directors to stand for election as directors at the Annual Meeting based on the qualifications and experience described in the biographical information below. The procedures and considerations of the NGCR Committee in recommending qualified director nominees are described below under “—Identification of Director Candidates.” Each director nominee’s term will run until the next annual meeting of stockholders following the Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

It is intended that the shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per Share (the “Common Stock”) represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the persons named therein as proxy holders FOR the election of each of the director nominees listed in this Proxy statement unless otherwise instructed. See “—Voting on Director Nominees” below for more information.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FORthe election of each of the director nominees.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  10

INFORMATION ABOUT THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES1

JEFFREY W. ECKEL

Age 64

Executive Chair – Board of Directors since 2023

Mr. Eckel has served as executive chair from March 2023. Mr. Eckel served as chief executive officer, president and chair from 2013 through February 2023, and was with the predecessor of our company as president and chief executive officer since 2000 and prior to that from 1985 to 1989 as a senior vice president. Mr. Eckel serves on the board of trustees of The Nature Conservancy of Maryland and DC. Mr. Eckel was appointed by the governor of Maryland to the board of the Maryland Clean Energy Center in 2011 where Mr. Eckel served until 2016 while also serving as its chairman from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Eckel has over 35 years of experience in financing, owning and operating infrastructure and energy assets. Mr. Eckel received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Miami University in 1980 and a Master of Public Administration degree from Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, in 1981. He holds Series 24, 63 and 79 securities licenses. We believe Mr. Eckel’s extensive experience in managing companies operating in the energy sector and expertise in energy investments make him qualified to serve as executive chair.
JEFFREY A. LIPSON

Age 55

Director since 2023

Chief Executive Officer and President

Mr. Lipson has served as chief executive officer and president from March 2023. He served as executive vice president and our chief operating officer from 2021 to February 2023, and as our chief financial officer from 2019 to February 2023. Previously, Mr. Lipson was president and chief executive officer and director of Congressional Bancshares and its subsidiary Congressional Bank (now Forbright Bank). Mr. Lipson has also been a senior vice president and the treasurer of CapitalSource Inc. and its subsidiary CapitalSource Bank and a senior vice president, Corporate Treasury, at Bank of America and its predecessor FleetBoston Financial. Mr. Lipson received a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Pennsylvania State University in 1989 and a Masters in Business Administration in Finance from New York University’s Leonard N. Stern School of Business in 1993. Mr. Lipson serves on the board of directors of the Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington. We believe Mr. Lipson’s significant prior experience as a chief executive officer and his extensive financial expertise make him qualified to serve as president and chief executive officer and as a member of our board of directors.
TERESA M. BRENNER

Age 59

Independent Director since 2016

Lead Independent Director since 2019

Committee:

•  NGCR Committee (Chair)

•  Compensation Committee

Ms. Brenner retired from Bank of America Corporation in 2012, where she served in a variety of roles for approximately 20 years, including most recently as a managing director and associate general counsel. Ms. Brenner served on the board of directors of Residential Capital, LLC from March 2013 to December 2013 during its restructuring and through the confirmation of its bankruptcy proceeding. Ms. Brenner is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, the Society of Corporate Governance, and the American Corporate Counsel Association, and is a member in good standing of the North Carolina State Bar. Ms. Brenner has also held a variety of philanthropic and civic roles, including serving as president of Temple Israel and chairperson of Right Moves for Youth. Ms. Brenner received a Bachelor of Arts degree magna cum laude and with honors in history from Alma College in 1984 where she was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa and a Juris Doctorate cum laude from Wake Forest University School of Law in 1987 where she was a Carswell Scholar and an editor of its Law Review. We believe Ms. Brenner’s extensive experience in corporate governance and corporate strategy, law and compliance, and finance and capital markets gives her valuable insight and enables her to make significant contributions as a member of our board of directors.

(1)Furnished as of April 12, 2023.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  11

LIZABETH A. ARDISANA

Age 72

Independent Director since 2022

Committee:

•  Audit Committee

•  Compensation Committee

Ms. Ardisana is chief executive officer and the principal owner of ASG Renaissance LLC, which she founded in 1987. ASG Renaissance is a technical and communication services firm with more than three decades of experience providing services to a wide range of clients in the automotive, environmental, defense, construction, healthcare, banking and education sectors. She is also chief executive officer of Performance Driven Workforce LLC, a scheduling and staffing firm that was founded in 2015 and has since expanded into five states. Prior to founding ASG Renaissance LLC, Ms. Ardisana worked at Ford Motor Company for 14 years, holding various management positions in vehicle development, product planning and marketing. As a Hispanic and female business owner, Ms. Ardisana is an active business and civic leader in Michigan. She has served on the boards of publicly held Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (Nasdaq: CLNE) since 2019 and Huntington Bancshares Inc. (Nasdaq: HBAN) since 2016. She also serves on the board of the privately held U.S. Sugar Corporation. She was a member of the board of Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. from 2004 to 2013, and a member of the board of FirstMerit Corporation from 2013 to 2016. She has held numerous leadership positions in a variety of nonprofit organizations, including The Skillman Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Kettering University, Metropolitan Affairs Coalition, Focus: HOPE, and NextEnergy. Ms. Ardisana was appointed by the governor of Michigan to the executive board of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and chairs its finance committee. She is the vice chair of the board of Wayne Health, where she serves on the audit committee and compensation committee. Ms. Ardisana holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics and computer science from the University of Texas, a Master of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Detroit. We believe Ms. Ardisana’s significant experience and relationships in the automotive and environmental industries, as well as skills acquired through serving as a chief executive officer and as a member of multiple public and private company boards give her valuable insights and enable her to make significant contributions as a member of the Board.
CLARENCE D. ARMBRISTER

Age 65

Independent Director since 2021

Committee:

•  Finance and Risk Committee

•  NGCR Committee

Mr. Armbrister has served as president of Johnson C. Smith University since January 1, 2018. Previously, Mr. Armbrister served as president of Girard College from 2012 to 2017. Mr. Armbrister has served as chair of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee of Health Partners Plans Inc. since 2016. From 2008 to 2011, Mr. Armbrister served as chief of staff to the former Mayor of Philadelphia, Michael A. Nutter. Mr. Armbrister also served as senior vice president for administration and subsequently executive vice president and chief operating officer of Temple University from 2003 to 2007. Prior to that Mr. Armbrister served as vice president and director in the Municipal Securities Group and in other positions at PaineWebber & Co. (subsequently UBS PaineWebber Incorporated) from 1999 to 2003 and also served as an adjunct faculty member of the Beasley School of Law at Temple University from 1997 to 1998. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Armbrister served as managing director of the Philadelphia School District and prior to that, in 1994, he was appointed Philadelphia City treasurer. From 1982 to 1994, Mr. Armbrister was an associate and then partner at Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul (currently known as Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP). Mr. Armbrister also serves on the boards of various organizations, including the board of directors for Health Partners Plan, the board of trustees of Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health and the board of Charlotte Regional Business Alliance. Mr. Armbrister is also a former member of the board of directors of the National Adoption Center and the Community College of Philadelphia’s board of trustees. Mr. Armbrister received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and Economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1979 and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Michigan Law School in 1982. We believe Mr. Armbrister’s over 35 years of experience in education, law, government and finance gives him valuable insight and enables him to make significant contributions as a member of our board of directors.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  12
MICHAEL T. ECKHART

 

Age 74

Independent Director since 2019

Committee:

•  Finance and Risk Committee

•  NGCR Committee

Mr. Eckhart has served as a clinical professor of sustainable finance at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy since 2020, and also as an adjunct professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of International and Policy Affairs, teaching Environmental Finance since 2016. In 2019, Mr. Eckhart retired as managing director and global head of Environmental Finance from Citigroup, Inc., where he led Citigroup Inc.’s work in establishing the Green Bond Principles. Prior to joining Citigroup in 2011, Mr. Eckhart was the founding president of the American Council on Renewable Energy, a Washington DC-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that unites finance, policy and technology to accelerate the transition to a renewable energy economy. He previously led the SolarBank Initiative in Europe, India and South Africa, and worked in power generation and advanced technology with United Power Systems, Aretê Ventures, General Electric Company and Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Prior to that, he also served in the U.S. Navy Submarine Service. He has received several awards including Renewable Energy Man of the Year of India, the Skoll Award for Social Entrepreneurship, and the International Solar Energy Society’s Global Policy Leadership Award. He is vice chairman of the Oyster Recovery Partnership in Maryland and a director of the International Solar Energy Society headquartered in Frieberg Germany. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical & Electronic Engineering from Purdue University and a Master in Business Administration from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Eckhart’s extensive experience in renewable energy and finance makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
NANCY C. FLOYD

Age 68

Independent Director since 2021

Committee:

•  Audit Committee

•  Finance and Risk Committee

Ms. Floyd served as a managing director of Nth Power LLC, a venture capital firm she founded that specialized in clean energy technology, from 1993 to 2022. From 1989 to 1993, Ms. Floyd joined and started the technology practice for the utility consulting firm, Barakat and Chamberlain. From 1985 to 1988, Ms. Floyd was on the founding team and worked at PacTel Spectrum Services, a provider of network management services that was sold to IBM. In 1982, Ms. Floyd founded and served as chief executive officer of NFC Energy Corporation, one of the first wind development companies in the United States, which she successfully sold. From 1977 to 1980, Ms. Floyd served as director of special projects of Vermont Public Service Board (currently known as Vermont Public Utility Commission). Ms. Floyd has also served on the boards of 14 private, high growth, clean tech companies and was chair of the board for 4 of them. Since 2020, Ms. Floyd has been a board member, chair of the audit committee and member of the compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of Beam Global (Nasdaq: BEEM, BEEMW). She also served as a member of the board and chair of the audit committee of AltaGas Services and AltaGas Power Holdings (U.S.) Inc. (TSX: ALA) from 2018 to 2019, and board member of WGL Holdings, Inc. and Washington Gas (NYSE: WGL) from 2011 to 2018, where she sat on the audit committee and governance committee. Also, Ms. Floyd has served as fund advisor to Activate Capital from 2018 to 2021 and on the investment committee for The Christensen Fund from 2017 to 2021. Ms. Floyd received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Government from Franklin & Marshall College in 1976 and a Master of Arts degree in Political Science from Rutgers University in 1977. We believe Ms. Floyd’s extensive experience in clean energy technology and utilities makes her qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
CHARLES M. O’NEIL

Age 70

Independent Director since 2013

Committee:

•  Finance and Risk Committee (Chair)

•  NGCR Committee

Mr. O’Neil retired from ING Capital, LLC, at the end of 2015, where he served in a variety of executive and management roles for over 20 years, including as president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of ING Capital, LLC and head of Structured Finance, Americas, the largest operating unit of ING Capital. Mr. O’Neil received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from The Pennsylvania State University in 1974 and a Master in Business Administration degree in International Finance from Fordham University in 1978. We believe Mr. O’Neil’s experience of over 35 years in structured and project finance focusing on energy related projects, combined with his senior management role with a large international bank’s wholesale banking activities in the Americas, makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  13
RICHARD J. OSBORNE

 

Age 72

Independent Director since 2013

Committee:

•  Compensation Committee (Chair)

•  Audit Committee

Mr. Osborne retired from Duke Energy Corporation in 2006, having served in a variety of executive roles including chief financial officer, chief risk officer, treasurer and group vice president for Public & Regulatory Affairs during his 31 years with the organization. Mr. Osborne also served as a director of Duke Energy Field Services, a joint venture between Duke Energy Corporation and ConocoPhillips, and as a director of TEPPCO Partners, LP, a master limited partnership managing mid-stream energy assets. He also chaired the Finance Divisions of the Southeastern Electric Exchange and Edison Electric Institute, and was a founding board member of the Committee of Chief Risk Officers. Subsequent to leaving Duke Energy, Mr. Osborne executed consulting assignments for clients in, or serving, the energy industry. Mr. Osborne presently serves on the boards of Chautauqua Institution and the Penland School of Craft. Mr. Osborne received a Bachelor of Arts degree in History and Economics from Tufts University in 1973 and a Master of Business Administration from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1975. We believe that Mr. Osborne’s over 35 years of experience in energy sector finance makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
STEVEN G. OSGOOD

Age 66

Independent Director since 2015

Committee:

•  Audit Committee (Chair)

•  Compensation Committee

Mr. Osgood has served as the chief executive officer of Square Foot Companies, LLC, a Cleveland, Ohio based private real estate company focused on self-storage and single-tenant properties since 2008. Mr. Osgood is also a trustee for National Storage Affiliates Trust, a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) focused on the ownership of self-storage properties, since its public offering in April 2015. Mr. Osgood serves as chair of the finance committee for the company and on its audit committee. Prior to his current position, Mr. Osgood served as president and chief financial officer of U-Store-It Trust (now named CubeSmart), a self-storage REIT from the company’s initial public offering in 2004 to 2006. He also served as chief financial officer of several other REITs. Mr. Osgood is a former Certified Public Accountant. He graduated from Miami University with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1978 and graduated from the University of San Diego with a Masters in Business Administration in 1987. We believe that Mr. Osgood’s REIT experience and over 20 years of experience in corporate finance make him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
KIMBERLY A. REED

Age 52

Independent Director
since 2023

Committee:

•  Audit Committee

•  Finance and Risk Committee

Ms. Reed has served as an external director of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited since June 2022, an independent director of Momentus Inc. since August 2021, and a distinguished fellow at the Council on Competitiveness since February 2021. From May 2019 to January 2021— after being confirmed by the U.S. Senate on a strong bipartisan basis — Ms. Reed served as the first woman chairman of the board of directors, president and chief executive officer of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), the nation’s official $135 billion export credit agency, where she worked to help U.S. companies succeed in the competitive global marketplace. She previously served as president of the International Food Information Council Foundation where she focused on agriculture, nutrition, health, and sustainability issues; senior advisor to U.S. Treasury Secretaries Henry Paulson and John Snow; chief executive officers of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund); and counsel to three committees of the U.S. Congress where she conducted oversight and investigations. Ms. Reed also currently serves on the American Swiss Foundation board of directors, Hudson Institute’s Alexander Hamilton Commission on Securing America’s National Security Innovation Base, Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue Advisory Council and Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington Dean’s Alliance. Recognized as one of the “100 Women Leaders in STEM,” she received the U.S. Department of Defense’s highest civilian award — the Medal for Distinguished Public Service — and is a Council on Foreign Relations life member and a National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Certified Director. She holds a Juris Doctor degree from West Virginia University College of Law and a Bachelor of Science in biology and Bachelor of Arts in government from West Virginia Wesleyan College. We believe Ms. Reed’s experience in government and international finance, as well as her service on U.S. and non-U.S. public company boards, make her qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  14

SKILLS, EXPERTISE AND ATTRIBUTES

The NGCR Committee and our board of directors consider a broad range of factors when selecting nominees. We seek highly qualified director candidates from diverse business, professional and educational backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values. We believe that, as a group, the director nominees bring a diverse range of perspectives that contribute to the effectiveness of our board of directors as a whole.

The table below represents some of the key skills and attributes that our board of directors has identified as particularly valuable to the effective oversight of the Company and the execution of our corporate strategy, and the number of directorsdirector nominees that have that skill.skill or attribute. This director skills matrix is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each of our director nominees’ skills and attributes or contributions to our board of directors. Further information on each

SKILLS & EXPERTISE
ExperienceEckelBrennerArdisanaArmbristerEckhartFloydLipsonO’NeilOsborneOsgoodReed
Risk Management
Capital Markets 
CPA or Financial     
Power / Utility / Natural Resources Industries      
Financial Services   
Strategic Planning
Technology         
CEO/Senior Leadership Experience
Mergers & Acquisitions    
Corporate Governance
Human Capital Management
Commercial Lending      
            
BACKGROUND
Years on Board10702420101080
Age6459726574685570726652
Gender IdentificationMFFMMFMMMMF
African American / Black          
Asian / South Asian           
White / Caucasian  
Hispanic / Latino          
Indigenous           
LGBTQ+           
Veteran          
Disabled           

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  15

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

In accordance with Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) and its written charter, the NGCR Committee is responsible for identifying director nominee, including somecandidates for our board of their specific experience, qualifications, attributesdirectors and skills, isfor recommending director candidates to our board of directors for consideration as nominees to stand for election at our annual meetings of stockholders. Director candidates are recommended for nomination for election as directors in accordance with the procedures set forth in the biographies in this proxy statement.

proxytablev2.jpg
The procedures and considerationswritten charter of the Nominating, GovernanceNGCR Committee.

As noted above, we seek highly qualified director candidates from diverse business, professional and Corporate Responsibilityeducational backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values. The NGCR Committee periodically reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the current composition of our board of directors, (the “Nominating, Governanceour operating requirements and Corporate Responsibilitythe long-term interests of our stockholders. In accordance with the Guidelines, directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, exercise good business judgment, be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders and have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The NGCR Committee”) in recommending qualified reviews director candidates are described below under “Corporate Governancewith the objective of assembling a slate of directors that can best fulfill and Socialpromote our goals, taking into consideration personal factors and Environmental Responsibility—Identificationprofessional characteristics of Director Candidates” in this proxy statement. The Nominating, Governanceeach potential candidate, and Corporate Responsibility Committee andrecommends director candidates based upon contributions they can make to our board of directors concluded that eachand management and their ability to represent our long-term interests and those of our director nominees should be nominatedstockholders and other stakeholders.

The NGCR Committee evaluates the skill sets required for election basedservice on the qualifications and experience described in the biographical information below under “Information Regarding the Nominees for Election as Directors.”

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, each of our current directors, Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne, and Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino have been nominated by our board of directors to standand has developed a list of potential director candidates. If it is determined there is the need for electionadditional or replacement board members, the NGCR Committee will assess potential director candidates included on the list as directorswell as other appropriate potential director candidates based upon information it receives regarding such potential candidates or otherwise possesses, which assessment may be supplemented by additional inquiries. In conducting this assessment, the stockholders at the Annual Meeting to serve untilNGCR Committee considers knowledge, experience, skills, diversity and such other factors as it deems appropriate in light of our 2021 annual meetingcurrent needs and those of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify. It is intended that the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the persons named therein as proxy holders FOR the election of Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne, and Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino as directors, unless otherwise instructed. If the candidacy of Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne, or Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in favor of such substituted candidates (if any) as shall be nominated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reasonThe NGCR Committee may seek input on director candidates from other directors. The NGCR Committee does not solicit director nominations, but it may consider recommendations by stockholders using the same criteria that it uses to believe that, if elected, any of Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne,evaluate other nominees. The NGCR Committee may, in its sole discretion, engage one or Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino will be unablemore search firms or unwillingother consultants, experts or professionals to serve as a director.
Information Regarding the Nominees for Election as Directors
The followingassist in, among other things, identifying director candidates or gathering information is furnished as of April 9, 2020 regarding the nominees for re-election as directors.
Jeffrey W. Eckel, 61, has served as our president, chief executive officer,background and chairmanexperience of our boarddirector candidates. The NGCR Committee will have sole authority to approve any fees or terms of directors since 2013 and wasretention relating to these services.

Our stockholders of record who comply with the predecessoradvanced notice procedures set forth in our current Bylaws and outlined under the “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section of this proxy statement may nominate candidates for election as directors. See “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” for information regarding providing timely notice of stockholder proposals under our company as presidentBylaws and chief executive officer since 2000 and prior to that from 1985 to 1989 as a senior vice president. Mr. Eckel is a member of the board of directors of the Alliance To Save Energy and is a member of the President’s Council of Ceres, Inc., a member of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center’s Corporate Leaders program, and on the Board of Trustees of The Nature Conservancy of Maryland and DC. He was appointedrules promulgated by the governor of Maryland to the board of directors of the Maryland Clean Energy Center in 2011, where he served until 2016 while also serving as its chairman from 2012 to



2014. Mr. Eckel has over 35 years of experience in financing, owningU.S. Securities and operating infrastructure and energy assets. Mr. Eckel received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Miami University in 1980 and a Master of Public Administration degree from Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, in 1981. He holds Series 24, 63 and 79 securities licenses. We believe Mr. Eckel's extensive experience in managing companies operating in the energy sector and expertise in energy investments make him qualified to serve as our president and chief executive officer and as chairman of our board of directors.
Teresa M. Brenner, 56, has served as one of our independent directors since April 2016 and has served as our Lead Independent Director since July 2019. Ms. Brenner retired from Bank of America Corporation in 2012, where she had served in a variety of rolesExchange Commission (the “SEC”).

MAJORITY VOTE POLICY

The Guidelines provide for approximately 20 years, including most recently as a Managing Director and Associate General Counsel. Ms. Brenner served on the Board of Directors of Residential Capital, LLC from March 2013 to December 2013, during its restructuring and through the confirmation of its bankruptcy proceeding. Ms. Brenner has also held a variety of philanthropic roles, having served as a trustee of Temple Israel as well as serving as its Treasurer and its First Vice President. Ms. Brenner received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Alma College in 1984 and a Juris Doctorate from Wake Forest University School of Law in 1987. We believe Ms. Brenner’s extensive experience in corporate governance, law and finance makes her qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.


Michael T. Eckhart, 71, has served as one of our independent directors since 2019. Mr. Eckhart has served as a Clinical Professor of Sustainable Finance at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy since 2020, and also as an Adjunct Professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of International and Policy Affairs, teaching Environmental Finance since 2016. In 2019, Mr. Eckhart retired as Managing Director and Global Head of Environmental Finance from Citigroup, Inc., where he led Citigroup Inc.’s work in establishing the Green Bond Principles. Prior to joining Citigroup in 2011, Mr. Eckhart was the founding President of the American Council on Renewable Energy, a Washington DC-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that unites finance, policy and technology to accelerate the transition to a renewable energy economy. He previously led the SolarBank Initiative in Europe, India and South Africa, and worked in power generation and advanced technology with United Power Systems, Aretê Ventures, General Electric Company and Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Prior to that, he also served in the U.S. Navy Submarine Service. He has received several awards including Renewable Energy Man of the Year of India, the Skoll Award for Social Entrepreneurship, and the International Solar Energy Society’s Global Policy Leadership Award. He is Vice Chairman of the Oyster Recovery Partnership in Maryland and a Director of the International Solar Energy Society headquartered in Frieberg Germany. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical & Electronic Engineering from Purdue University and a Master in Business Administration from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Eckhart’s extensive experience in renewable energy and finance makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Simone F. Lagomarsino, 58, has served as one of our independent directors since 2019. Ms. Lagomarsino has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Luther Burbank Corporation and Luther Burbank Savings since January 2, 2019, and has also served on the board of directors of Luther Burbank Corporation since November 30, 2018. Additionally, Ms. Lagomarsino has served on the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco since 2013, where she is currently the Vice Chair of the Board and Chair of the Risk Committee, and has previously provided leadership as the Chair of the Audit Committee. As of January 2020, Ms. Lagomarsino serves as one of twelve members of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s Community Depository Institution Advisory Council. Prior to joining Luther Burbank Corporation, Ms. Lagomarsino was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Western Bankers Association and a director of Pacific Premier Bancorp and Pacific Premier Bank. From 2011 to 2016, she served as Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bank, and President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Heritage Oaks Bancorp. Ms. Lagomarsino also previously held executive positions with Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Ventura County National Bank, and Kinecta Federal Credit Union. Ms. Lagomarsino received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Claremont McKenna College and a Masters in Business Administration from Claremont Graduate University. We believe Ms. Lagomarsino’s extensive experience in leadership roles in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and numerous other financial institutions, including public companies, gives her valuable insight and enables her to make significant contributions as a member of our board of directors.
Charles M. O’Neil, 67, has served as one of our independent directors since 2013. Mr. O’Neil retired from ING Capital, LLC, at the end of 2015, where he served in a variety of executive and management roles for over 20 years, including as president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of ING Capital, LLC and Head of Structured Finance, Americas, the largest operating unit of ING Capital. Mr. O’Neil received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from The Pennsylvania State University in 1974 and a Master in Business Administration degree in International Finance from Fordham University in 1978. We believe Mr. O’Neil’s experience of over 35 years in structured and project finance focusing on energy related projects, combined with his senior management role with a large international bank’s wholesale banking activities in the Americas, makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Richard J. Osborne, 69, has served as one of our independent directors since 2013 and served as our Lead Independent Director from April 2014 to July 2019. Mr. Osborne retired from Duke Energy Corporation in 2006, having served in a variety of executive roles including chief financial officer, chief risk officer, treasurer and group vice president for Public & Regulatory Affairs


during his 31 years with the organization. Mr. Osborne also served as a director of Duke Energy Field Services, a joint venture between Duke Energy Corporation and ConocoPhillips, and as a director of TEPPCO Partners, LP, a master limited partnership managing mid-stream energy assets. He also chaired the Finance Divisions of the Southeastern Electric Exchange and Edison Electric Institute, and was a founding board member of the Committee of Chief Risk Officers. Subsequent to leaving Duke Energy, Mr. Osborne executed consulting assignments for clients in, or serving, the energy industry. Mr. Osborne presently serves on the boards of Chautauqua Institution, Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte Ballet and the Penland School of Crafts. Mr. Osborne received a Bachelor of Arts degree in History and Economics from Tufts University in 1973 and a Master of Business Administration from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1975. We believe that Mr. Osborne’s over 35 years of experience in energy sector finance makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Steven G. Osgood, 63, has served as one of our independent directors since January 2015. Mr. Osgood has served as the chief executive officer of Square Foot Companies, LLC, a Cleveland, Ohio based private real estate company focused on self-storage and single-tenant properties since 2008. Mr. Osgood is also a trustee for National Storage Affiliates Trust, a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) focused on the ownership of self-storage properties, since its public offering in April 2015. Mr. Osgood serves as chair of the Investment Committee for the company and on its Audit Committee. Prior to his current position, Mr. Osgood served as president and chief financial officer of U-Store-It Trust (now named CubeSmart), a Cleveland based self-storage REIT from the company’s initial public offering in 2004 to 2006. He also served as chief financial officer of several other REITs. Mr. Osgood is a former Certified Public Accountant. He graduated from Miami University with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1978 and graduated from the University of San Diego with a Masters in Business Administration in 1987. Mr. Osgood also serves on the National Board of the Alzheimer’s Association. We believe that Mr. Osgood’s REIT experience and over 20 years of experience in corporate finance make him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne, and Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino as directors.
A plurality of all the votes cast on the proposal at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to elect a director. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR Messrs. Eckel, Eckhart, O’Neil, Osborne, and Osgood and Mses. Brenner and Lagomarsino, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
We have a majority vote policy for the election of directors. In anPursuant to this policy, in any uncontested election of directors, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required toshall promptly tender his or her resignation to our board of directors.directors following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate ResponsibilityNGCR Committee is required toshall promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the NGCR Committee shall consider all factors it deems relevant, which may include the stated reasons, if any, why stockholders withheld votes from the director, any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes, the length of service and qualifications of the director, the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company, the composition of our board of directors, and such other information and factors as members of the NGCR Committee shall determine are relevant. Our board of directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation.will act on the NGCR Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days after the certification of the stockholder vote. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participate in the committee’sNGCR Committee’s consideration or board action regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation. The policy is more fully described below under

We will promptly disclose our board of director’s decision whether to accept the “Corporate Governanceresignation as tendered (providing a full explanation of the process by which the decision was reached and, Social and Environmental Responsibility—Corporate Governance Guidelines—Majority Vote Policy” sectionif applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation) in a press release, a filing with the SEC or in another broadly disseminated means of this proxy statement.


communication.

VACANCIES

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, any vacancies occurring on our board of directors, including vacancies occurring as a result of the death, resignation, or removal of a director, or due to an increase in the size of our board of directors, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is duly elected and qualifies.

There is no familial relationship, as defined under the SEC regulations, among any of our directors or executive officers. See “Corporate Governance and Social and Environmental Responsibility—Director Independence.”


2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of our board of directors (the “Audit Committee”) has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. Our board of directors is requesting that our stockholders ratify this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.
Ernst & Young LLP has audited our or our predecessor's consolidated financial statements since 1983 and has also provided certain tax and other services to us.
Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that ratification of this appointment of independent registered public accounting firm is not approved at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be provided with an opportunity to make a statement if so desired and to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 2019 and 2018.
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 (in thousands)
Audit fees (1)   
$2,085
 $1,944
Audit-related fees (2)   
234
 82
Tax fees (3)   
212
 201
Total   
$2,531
 2,227

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  16
Back to Contents
(1)Audit fees include fees and expenses related to the annual audit of the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and our internal controls over financial reporting, the review of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services associated with our public offerings, including review of the registration statement and related issuances of comfort letters and consents and other services related to SEC matters.
(2)Audit-related fees include fees and expenses related to agreed-upon procedures performed on certain of our securitization transactions.
(3)Tax fees include fees and expenses related to tax compliance and tax return preparation services, as well as tax planning and advisory services.
The Audit Committee’s charter provides that the Audit Committee shall review and pre-approve the engagement fees and the terms

VOTING ON DIRECTOR NOMINEES

A plurality of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by the external auditors and evaluate the effect thereof on the independence of the external auditors. The chair of the committee is authorized to pre-approve any audit or non-audit service on behalf of the committee up to an amount of $50,000, with such decisions presented to the full committee at its next meeting.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.
A majority of all of the votes cast on thisthe proposal at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for its approval.necessary to elect a director. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal,each director nominee unless otherwise instructed. Because directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors, and no additional nominations may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting, ‘withhold’ votes will have no effect on the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes willare not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.


3. STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in July 2010 includes a provision, which is further required by Section 14A If the candidacy of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), commonly referredany director nominee should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to as “Say on Pay,” that entitles our stockholders to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. At the 2017 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, our stockholders voted for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.
We believe that our compensation policies and practices are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Stockholders are urged to read the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, and especially the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which discusses our compensation philosophy and how our compensation policies and practices implement our philosophy.
As described more fully in that discussion, our compensation programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:
aligning our management team’s interests with stockholders’ expectations, including our continued investment in solutions that reduce carbon emissions or increase resilience to climate change;
motivating and rewarding our management team to grow our assets and earnings in a manner that is consistent with appropriate risk-taking and based on sound corporate governance practices; and
attracting and retaining an experienced and effective management team while also maintaining an appropriate expense structure.
One of the guiding principles underlying the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation philosophy is that compensation should encourage and reward strong financial and operational performance. In furtherance of this philosophy, the Compensation Committee established the 2019 annual incentive plan with quantitative and qualitative performance goals based upon the Company’s strategic goals. The quantitative goals were intended to focus our named executive officers (“NEOs”) on the key financial metrics that impact the Company’s results and stockholder value, including Core Earnings (as defined below) (1) and Core ROE (as defined below) (2). The qualitative goals included an evaluation of overall performance of each NEO. Set forth below is graphical illustration of our growth in Core Earnings per share and attractive and stable Core ROE.
coremetricsv2.jpg
(1)
Core Earnings and Core Earnings per share are not financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of 2019 Core Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 65 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. A reconciliation of 2018 Core Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 62 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019. We refer to this metric as "Core Earnings". In accordance with our Sustainable Investment Policy, we will only invest in assets that are either neutral or negative on incremental carbon emissions or have some other tangible environmental benefit such as reducing water consumption. As a result, our Core Earnings and other performance metrics that are based on Core Earnings are linked to the positive contributions we make to the environment. We believe that Core Earnings provides an additional measure of our core operating performance by eliminating the impact of certain non-cash expenses and facilitating a comparison of our financial results to those of other comparable companies with fewer or no non-cash charges and comparison of our own operating results from period to period. Our management team uses Core Earnings in this way. We believe that our investors also use Core Earnings, or a comparable supplemental performance measure, to evaluate and compare our performance to that of our peers, and as such, we believe that the Core Earnings metric is useful to our investors.


(2)
Core Return on Equity is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. It is calculated as annual Core Earnings as described above divided by the average of our GAAP stockholders' equity as of the last day of the four quarters during the year. GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2019, is located on page on page 81 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. GAAP stockholders' equity as of March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2019 are located on page 1 of the respective quarter's Form 10-Q. We refer to this metric as "Core ROE".
In addition, during 2019, we achieved the following milestones that we believe position us for future success:
Delivered $1.24 annual GAAP Earnings per share on a fully diluted basis in 2019, compared to $0.75 in 2018
Delivered $1.40 annual Core Earnings per share in 2019, compared to $1.38 in 2018
Closed $1.3 billion of transactions in 2019, including $475 million in Q4 2019
Grew Portfolio to $2.1 billion as of the end of 2019
Successfully completed inaugural issuances totaling $500 million in corporate unsecured green bonds
Reported a Portfolio Yield of 7.6% as of the end of 2019, compared to 6.8% at the end of 2018
Increased GAAP Net Investment Income by 58% to $38 million in 2019, compared to $24 million in 2018 and increased Core Net Investment Income (as defined below) (1) by 21% to $82 million in 2019, compared to $68 million in 2018
Reported a debt to equity ratio of 1.5x and fixed-rate debt level of 98% as of the end of 2019
Appointed Teresa M. Brenner as Lead Independent Director
Received Ethical Corporation's Responsible Investment Award, ACORE's Renewable Energy Leadership Award and CR Magazine's Responsible CEO of the Year Award for ESG leadership
Estimated that 385 thousand metric tons of annual carbon emissionsproxies will be avoidedvoted by our 2019 transactions equating to a CarbonCount® score of 0.30 metric tons per $1,000 invested. For additional details related to these carbon emissions standards, see “Corporate Governance and Social and Responsibility—Environmental Impact”
(1)    Core Net Investment Income is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. It is calculated as GAAP net investment income (interest income and rental income less interest expense) as reported on page 82 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 plus Core Earnings from our equity method investments when allocating cash distributions between a return on and return of invested capital plus amortization of real estate intangibles, both reported on page 65 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. We refer to this metric as "Core Net Investment Income". We utilize this metric in operating our business and believe it is useful information for our investors for the same reasons discussed for Core Earnings above.

In 2019, we generated higher Core Net Investment Income coupled with strong gain on sale and other fee income. The increase in Core Net Investment Income was a result of strong origination volumes, a higher yielding balance sheet and a reduction in our financing costs due to lower cost and outstanding balance of debt. This resulted in Core Earnings per share meeting our predetermined target and Core ROE exceeding our predetermined target which, when taken together, entitled the NEOs to receive 111% of their target corporate performance bonus amounts, which was 70% of NEO incentive compensation. The remaining 30% was based on an evaluation of individual performance. The calculated corporate performance combined with individual performance resulted in the NEOs receiving an average of 106% of their target incentive compensation, a decrease from approximately 135% for 2018.
Overall, we believe these 2019 results provide us a solid foundation to achieve longer-term future success. Our compensation decisions for 2019 have considered the challenges faced and results achieved by our management team in 2019. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation, Discussion and Analysis” for additional details related to our compensation policies and practices and the achievement of our performance goals.
We are requesting your non-binding vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meetingholders in favor of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and narrative disclosure.”


Because your vote is advisory, it will notsuch substituted candidates (if any) as shall be binding upon us ornominated by our board of directors. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation programs, values your opinion and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in this proxy statement.
If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.


BOARD AND COMMITTEE MATTERS
Board of Directors
Our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our affairs. Our board of directors conducts its business through meetings and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings. Our board of directors intends to hold at least four regularly scheduled meetings per year, generally one per calendar quarter, and additional special meetings as necessary. For the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, our board of directors held ten meetings. All our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of our board of directors and of the committees of our board of directors on which they served during this period (during the period that they served), either in person or telephonically. All the directors then serving on our board of directors attended our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and all directors currently serving on our board of directors intend to attend our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders via a live webcast. Our board of directors’ policy, as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors and all meetings of our stockholders.
Committees of our Board of Directors
Our board of directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Finance and Risk Committee.
Audit Committee
Steven Osgood (Chair), Simone Lagomarsino and Richard Osborne are the current members of the Audit Committee. Charles O'Neil previously servedno reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve as a member of the Audit Committee until July 30, 2019. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules governing the qualifications of Audit Committee members, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Audit Committee. Our board of directors has also determined, based upon its qualitative assessment of their relevant levels of knowledge and business experience (see “Election of Directors” in this proxy statement for a description of our directors’ respective backgrounds and experience), that Mr. Osgood, Ms. Lagomarsino and Mr. Osborne each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of, and as defined by, the SEC rules and each has the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise required by NYSE listing standards. In addition, our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate as required by the NYSE listing standards.
The Audit Committee is responsible for engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
The Audit Committee met seven times during 2019. These meetings were designed, among other things, to discharge our board of directors’ responsibilities relating to our and our subsidiaries’ corporate accounting and reporting practices, the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the performance, qualifications and independence of our external auditors, and the staffing, performance, budget, responsibilities and qualifications of our internal audit function. The Audit Committee also has responsibility for reviewing our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, which responsibility is shared with the Finance and Risk Committee. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing with management and external auditors our unaudited interim and audited annual financial statements as well as approving the filing of our financial statements, meeting with officers responsible for certifying our Form 10-K or any quarterly report on Form 10-Q prior to any such certification and reviewing with such officers disclosures related to any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls. The Audit Committee is charged with periodically discussing with our external auditors such auditors’ judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles as applied in our consolidated financial statements.
The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.
Compensation Committee
Richard Osborne (Chair), Teresa Brenner, and Steven Osgood are the current members of the Compensation Committee. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, which met seven times during 2019, is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the approval, administration and evaluation of our compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviewing the


compensation of our directors and executive officers. The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.

Since 2018, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC ("Pay Governance"), a compensation consulting firm, to assist the Compensation Committee on the setting of certain annual bonus targets for our NEOs. In July 2019, the Compensation Committee also engaged Pay Governance to provide analysis and recommendations regarding (1) base salaries, annual bonuses and long-term incentive compensation for our executive management team, and (2) the director compensation program for independent members of our board of directors, replacing FTI Consulting, Inc. (“FTI”) as the Company’s compensation consultant for such matters. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee and it has not performed, and does not currently provide, any other services to management or the Company. The Compensation Committee has determined that Pay Governance is independent pursuant to the Company's Compensation Committee charter.
Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee
Teresa Brenner (Chair), Michael Eckhart, and Charles O’Neil are the current members of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, which met seven times during 2019, is responsible for, among other things, reviewing periodically and making recommendations to our board of directors on the range of qualifications that should be represented on our board of directors and eligibility criteria for individual board membership, as well as seeking, considering and recommending to our board qualified candidates for election as directors and approving and recommending to the full board of directors the appointment of each of our officers and, if necessary, a lead independent director. For a discussion of the consideration of diversity in the process by which candidates for director are considered for nomination by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and the process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director, including nominees recommended by security holders, please see “Corporate Governance and Social and Environmental Responsibility—Identification of Director Candidates” in this proxy statement. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our board of directors and our corporate governance and annually recommends nominees for each committee of our board of directors. The committee also periodically reviews the Company’s strategies, activities, policies, and communications regarding sustainability and other environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) related matters and makes recommendations to our board of directors. In this capacity, the committee reviews our CarbonCount® score discussed in the “Corporate Governance and Social and Responsibility—Environmental Impact” section below. In addition, the committee annually facilitates the assessment of our board of directors’ performance as a whole and that of the individual directors and reports thereon to our board of directors.
The specific responsibilities of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.
Finance and Risk Committee
Charles O’Neil (Chair), Michael Eckhart, and Simone Lagomarsino are the current members of the Finance and Risk Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Finance and Risk Committee are independent under the NYSE listing standards, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Finance and Risk Committee. The Finance and Risk Committee, which met five times during 2019, has responsibility for the assessment, monitoring and oversight of matters relating to the Company’s financings. The Finance and Risk Committee also discusses and reviews policies and guidelines with respect to our risk assessment and risk management for various risks, including, but not limited to, our interest rate, counter-party, credit, capital availability, refinancing and certain environmental risks. The Finance and Risk Committee also reviews and assesses the adequacy of our insurance coverage and our cybersecurity policies and programs.
The specific responsibilities of the Finance and Risk Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has furnished the following report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019:
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, our risk management, the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to


select, determine the compensation of, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors.
Management is primarily responsible for our financial reporting process including the system of internal controls and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria established in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee and review the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning compliance with laws, regulations or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as to auditor independence. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP attended the Audit Committee meetings on at least a quarterly basis. These meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management and Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP matters that independent accounting firms must discuss with audit committees under generally accepted auditing standards and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), including, among other things, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, which included a discussion of Ernst & Young LLP’s judgments about the quality (not just the acceptability) of our accounting principles as applied to financial reporting. The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audit.
The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from us. Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with audit committees concerning independence and represented that it is independent from us. The Audit Committee also received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, audit-related and tax services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.
Based on the Audit Committee’s review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in its written charter, the Audit Committee recommended to our board of directors that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 be included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 and is presenting this selection to our stockholders for ratification.
Steven G. Osgood
Simone Lagomarsino
Richard Osborne
The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.


COMPENSATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
A director who is also an employee of the Company is referred to as an executive director. Executive directors do not receive compensation for serving on our board of directors. We pay directors’ fees only to those directors who are independent under the NYSE listing standards, as more fully described elsewhere in this section under "Corporate Governance and Social and Environmental Responsibility-Director Independence". We have approved and implemented a compensation program for our independent directors that consists of an annual cash retainer fee and long-term equity awards as described below. We also reimburse each of our independent directors for his or her expenses incurred in connection with his or her board responsibilities. The following table summarizes the annual compensation received by our independent directors for 2019.
Director Compensation Table for 2019
Name 
 Fees Paid or Earned in Cash ($) 
Stock Awards ($) (1)
 
Total ($)
Rebecca B. Blalock 65,000 103,538 168,538
Teresa M. Brenner 84,167 103,538 187,705
Mark J. Cirilli 80,000 103,538 183,538
Michael T. Eckhart 10,083 63,799 73,882
Simone F. Lagomarsino 10,083 63,799 73,882
Charles M. O’Neil 80,000 103,538 183,538
Richard J. Osborne 88,333 103,538 191,871
Steven G. Osgood 85,000 103,538 188,538

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  17
Back to Contents
(1)
In 2019, Each of Messrs. Cirilli, O’Neil, Osborne and Osgood, and Mses. Blalock and Brenner were granted 4,010 long-term incentive plan ("LTIP") units in Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Partnership, LP, the Company's operating partnership (our "Operating Partnership") valued at $25.82 per share, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE at the date of grant. Mr. Eckhart and Ms, Lagomarsino were granted 2,385 LTIP units in 2019 valued at $26.75 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE at the date of grant. The grant dates fair value was computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 and the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (Note 2 and Note 11, Equity). The LTIP units granted in 2019 to Messrs. O'Neil, Osborne and Osgood and Ms. Brenner vest on May 15, 2020. The LTIP units granted in 2019 to Mr. Eckhart and Ms. Lagomarsino vest on August 15, 2020. The LTIP units granted in 2019 to Ms. Blalock and Mr. Cirilli vested on July 30, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, Ms. Brenner and each of Messrs. O’Neil, Osborne, and Osgood held 3,401 shares of unvested restricted Common Stock and 4,010 unvested LTIP units. Each of Mr. Eckhart and Ms. Lagomarsino held 2,385 unvested LTIP units.

The components of the independent director compensation are as follows:
cash retainer of $65,000 annually per director;
cash retainer to the Lead Independent Director of $25,000 annually;
cash retainer to the Chair of the Audit Committee of $20,000 annually;
cash retainer to each of the Chairs of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Finance and Risk Committee of $15,000 annually; and
equity grant of $100,000 annually per director in the form of LTIP units. LTIP units are described in more detail as set forth below under "Executive Compensation —Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity Incentive Plan."
All cash fees described above are paid quarterly in arrears.
Our directors are also subject to stock ownership guidelines, which are described in more detail as set forth below under “Executive Compensation —Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers and Directors.”

Changes to our Director Compensation for 2020
Our board of directors permitted directors to make an election, on or before December 31, 2019, to receive equity in the form of LTIP units in lieu of all or a portion of their cash compensation for 2020.


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY


We make investments in climate change solutions by providing capital to leading companies in energy efficiency, renewable energy and other sustainable infrastructure markets. Under the direction of our chief executive officer and the board of directors, we are focused on achieving a high level of environmental and social responsibility and strong corporate governance. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee of our board of directors is responsible for our ESG oversight, including for our policies and communications. Additionally, we have a committee, comprised of employees from across the organization, that is focused on implementing various ESG strategies, policies, and communications and reports to our chief executive officer. In 2019, we issued our inaugural ESG report that illustrates our progress towards implementing these strategies and policies.
Our business is focused on reducing the impact of greenhouse gases that have been scientifically linked to climate change. We refer to these gases, which are often for consistency expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents, as carbon emissions. We estimate the carbon impact of each of our investments. In addition, we operate our business in a manner intended to reduce our own environmental impact, including by purchasing 100 percent renewable electricity for our office, encouraging recycling and composting, and offering clean transportation employee incentives for electric and hybrid vehicles.

We have also adopted policies focused on minimizing the environmental impact of our operations. We continue to implement the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), which are located in our Form 10-K.

We are also a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact, an initiative focused on responsible business practices related to human rights, labor, the environment and anti-corruption. We participate in a number initiatives and with coalitions that share our commitment to climate change mitigation, sustainability , and the expansion of clean energy, including the Paris Climate Agreement, the United Nations Global Compact campaign entitled Business Ambition for 1.5°- Only Our Future, Climate Action 100+, The Principles for Responsible Investment (“PRI”), the “We Are Still In” coalition, and the reporting framework established by an international consortium of business and environmental NGOs referred to as the Climate Disclosure Standards Board.

We are also focused on our social responsibility within our workforce and our community. We have evaluated and adopted certain human capital and human rights management policies to further our commitment to social responsibility. Our culture is focused on hiring and retaining diverse and highly talented employees and empowering them to create value for our stockholders. In our employee selection process and operation of our business we adhere to equal employment opportunity policies and encourage the participation of our employees in training programs that will enhance their effectiveness in the performance of their duties. Our chief executive officer periodically leads employee meetings intended to encourage employees to understand why sustainability matters and regularly meets with small groups of employees to receive their feedback on the business.
We provide attractive benefits that promote the health of our employees and their families and design compelling job opportunities, aligned with our mission, in an energizing work environment. We also encourage our employees to continue to develop in their careers, including by obtaining advanced degrees or professional certifications. We compensate our employees according to our fair remuneration policies and believe deeply in paying for performance. Therefore, employees generally receive a portion of their compensation in the form of equity grants tied to performance. We encourage our employees to contribute their time to support various community and charitable activities and sponsor several local community organizations with a primary focus on environmental organizations.
STRUCTURE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PHILOSOPHY

Our corporate governance philosophy is based on maintaining a close alignment of our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance structure include the following:

our board of directors is not staggered, with each of our directors subject to re-election annually;
our board of directors has determined that six of our seven directors are independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act;
we have a Lead Independent Director, who convenes and chairs executive sessions of the independent directors to discuss certain matters without management present, as described in greater detail below;
three of our directors each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC;
two of our directors, including our Lead Independent Director, are women, constituting 29% of our board of directors and 33% of our independent directors;
our Guidelines provide for a majority vote policy for the election of directors pursuant to which any nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation to our board of directors, which shall consider whether or not to accept such resignation, as described in greater detail below;


we have established a target retirement age of 75 for our directors;
we have an active stockholder outreach program, including annually providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation of executives;
our Statement of Corporate Policy Regarding Equity Transactions prohibits our directors and officers from hedging our equity securities, holding such securities in a margin account or pledging such securities as collateral for a loan;
we have a Clawback Policy that provides for the possible recoupment of performance or incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by us with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws (other than due to a change in applicable accounting methods, rules or interpretations);
we have opted out of the control share acquisition statute in the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) and have exempted from the business combinations statute in the MGCL transactions that are approved by our board of directors;
we do not have a stockholder rights plan; and
our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee oversees and directs our ESG strategies, activities, policies and communications.

Our Board of DirectorsOur PoliciesOur Charter and BylawsOur Shareholder Engagement

We separated the roles of chair and chief executive officer.

We have a majority vote policy for the election of directors.

Our board of directors is not staggered.

Nine of our eleven current directors are independent.

We have a Lead Independent Director.

Three directors qualify as an “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.

Four directors, including our Lead Independent Director, are women, constituting 36% of our board of directors.

Women and racially diverse directors constitute a majority of our nine independent directors.

We have established a target retirement age of 75 for our directors.

Our NGCR Committee oversees and directs our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategies, activities, policies and communications.

Our board members and NEOs are required to maintain certain levels of stock ownership in our company ranging between three and six times their base salary or retainer, depending on position.

Our Statement of Corporate Policy Regarding Equity Transactions prohibits our directors and officers from hedging our equity securities, holding such securities in a margin account or pledging such securities as collateral for a loan.

   Our Clawback Policy provides for the possible recoupment ofperformance or incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by us with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws (other than due to a change in applicable accounting methods, rules or interpretations).

•   We have opted out of the control share acquisition statute in the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”).

We have exempted from the business combination statute in the MGCL transactions that are approved by our board of directors (including a majority of our directors who are not affiliates or associates of the acquiring person).

We do not have a stockholder rights plan (i.e., no poison pill).

Our stockholders have the concurrent right to amend our Bylaws.

We have an active stockholderoutreach program, including annually providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation of NEOs.

In order to foster the highest standards of ethics and conduct in all business relationships, we have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy (the Code“Code of ConductConduct”). This policy, which covers a wide range of business practices and procedures, applies to our officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, and employees.consultants. In addition, we have implemented Whistleblowing Procedures related to accounting and auditing matters as well as Code of Conduct mattersour whistleblowing policy (the Whistleblower Policy“Whistleblower Policy”) that sets forth procedures by which any Covered Persons (as defined in the Whistleblower Policy) may raise,report, on a confidential basis, concerns regarding, among other things,relating to any questionable or unethical accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, with our Audit Committee as well as any potential codeCode of conductConduct or ethics violations with our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee or our General Counsel.violations. We review these policies on a periodic basis with our employees.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  18
Role

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our Boardaffairs and it conducts its business through meetings and actions taken by written consent in lieu of Directors and Risk Oversight

meetings. Pursuant to our Charter and Bylaws and the MGCL, our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors. Our board of directors has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for our overall performance and direction, but is not involved in our day-to-day operations, which are managed by our senior management team. Members of our board of directors keep informed of our business by participating in meetings of our board of directors and its committees, by reviewing analyses, reports and other materials provided to them and through discussions with the chairman of our board of directors, president and chief executive officer and other executive officers and other employees of the Company.

Our board of directors intends to hold at least four regularly scheduled meetings per year, generally one per calendar quarter, and additional special meetings as necessary.

Board of Directors Leadership Structure

Our board of directors has the flexibility to decide when the positions of chair and chief executive officer should be held by one person or separated, and whether an executive or an independent director should be chair. This allows our board of directors to choose the leadership structure that it believes will best serve the interests of our stockholders at any particular time. Currently, Mr. Eckel serves as the chairman ofexecutive chair and Mr. Lipson serves as our board of directors and chief executive officer. In addition, our board of directors has an active Lead Independent Director, Teresa M. Brenner. Our board of directors believes that this leadership structure is best for the Company and its stockholders at this time. In his dual role, Mr. Eckel uses his extensive experience in managing companies operating in the energy sector and expertise in energy investments for over 35 years through many business cycles to effectively and efficiently guide the Company and our board of directors, including overseeing the Company’s strategies relating to ESG matters. He fulfills his responsibilities as chairman of our board of directors through close interaction with Ms. Brenner and the committee chairs.

In reaching the conclusion that the roles of the chairman and chief executive officer should be held by one person, our board of directors has considered the performance of the Company since its IPO as well as the views expressed by our stockholders and other constituents, both through stockholder votes and through direct outreach by management and our board of directors.

Our board of directors concluded that Mr. Eckel is a well-seasoned leader with a proven track record of leading the Company over a long period of growth both before and after our IPO. Based on his and our track record, our board of directors determined that Mr. Eckel is the best person to continue to lead the Company and our board of directors. Our board of directors also considered the actual board relationships and determined that there is actual and effective independent oversight of management by our supermajority independent board led by Ms. Brenner in her capacity as our Lead Independent Director. Ms. Brenner has served as our Lead Independent Director since 2019. Our board of directors believes that this board leadership structure, when combined with the functioning of the independent director component of our board of directors and our overall corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent oversight of our business and affairs.

ROLE OF THE LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

 

TERESA M. BRENNER

•   Collaborate with the executive chair, chief executive officer and secretary to schedule meetings of our board of directors and to set meeting agenda

•   Ensure that matters of concern or interest to the independent directors are appropriately scheduled for discussion at board of directors meetings

•   Chair meetings in the absence of the executive chair

•   Organize and preside over meetings and executive sessions of the independent directors

•   Serve as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the executive chair or chief executive officer on matters where either person may be conflicted

•   Together with the full board of directors, evaluate the performances of the chief executive officer and executive chair and meet with each of the chief executive officer and executive chair to discuss such evaluations

•   Authorize the retention of outside advisors and consultants who report directly to our board of directors

•   Meet regularly with the executive chair as well as each director

•   Along with management, periodically meet with institutional and other investors

Director Independence, Executive Sessions and Independent Oversight

The Guidelines provide that a majority of the directors serving on our board of directors must be independent as required by NYSE listing standards. In addition, as permitted under the MGCL, our board of directors has adopted certain independence standards (the “Independence Standards”) to assist it in making determinations with respect to the independence of directors. The Independence Standards are available for viewing on our website at www.hasi.com. Based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that nine of our eleven current directors—Lizabeth Ardisana, Clarence Armbrister, Teresa Brenner, Michael Eckhart, Nancy Floyd, Charles O’Neil, Richard Osborne, Steven Osgood and Kimberly Reed—qualify as independent directors under the NYSE listing standards and the Independence Standards. There is no familial relationship, as defined under the SEC regulations, among any of our directors or executive officers.

The independent directors serving on our board of directors meet in executive sessions at least four times per year at regularly scheduled meetings of our board of directors and are active in the oversight of the Company. These executive sessions of our board of directors are presided over by our Lead Independent Director, Ms. Brenner. The independent directors oversee such critical matters as the integrity of our financial statements, the evaluation and compensation of executive officers and the selection and evaluation of directors. Each independent director has the ability to add items to the agenda of our board of directors meetings or raise subjects for discussion that are not on the agenda for that meeting.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  19
Committees

Our board of directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Finance and Risk Committee. Our committees are comprised solely of independent directors.

Audit Committee

Current Members

Steven G. Osgood (Chair)
Lizabeth A. Ardisana
Nancy C. Floyd
Richard J. Osborne
Kimberly A. Reed

Primary Responsibilities

   Engaging our independent registered public accounting firm.

   Reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement.

   Approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

   Reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.

   Considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.

   Overseeing:

   our and our subsidiaries’ corporate accounting and reporting practices,

   the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements,

   our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements,

   the performance, qualifications and independence of our external auditors,

•  

the staffing, scope of work, performance, budget, responsibilities and qualifications of our internal audit function, including the engagement of outside advisors to assist our internal audit function.

•   

Reviewing our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, which responsibility is shared with the Finance and Risk Committee.

•   

Reviewing with management and external auditors our unaudited interim and audited annual financial statements as well as approving the filing of our financial statements

•   

Meeting with officers responsible for certifying our annual report on Form 10-K or any quarterly report on Form 10-Q prior to any such certification and reviewing with such officers any disclosures related to any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls.

•   

Periodically discussing with our external auditors such auditors’ judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles as applied in our consolidated financial statements.

The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hasi.com.

Independence

Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules governing the qualifications of Audit Committee members, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Audit Committee.

Financial Expertise and Literacy

Our board of directors has also determined, based upon its qualitative assessment of their relevant levels of knowledge and business experience, that Mr. Osgood, Ms. Floyd and Mr. Osborne each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of, and as defined by, the SEC rules and each has the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise required by NYSE listing standards. In addition, our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate as required by the NYSE listing standards.

Report

The Audit Committee Report is set forth beginning on page 44 of this proxy statement.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  20

 

Compensation Committee

Current Members

Richard J. Osborne (Chair)
Lizabeth A. Ardisana
Teresa M. Brenner
Steven G. Osgood

Primary Responsibilities

•  

Overseeing the approval, administration and evaluation of our compensation plans, policies and programs.

•  

Reviewing the compensation of our directors and executive officers.

•  

Overseeing regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters.

•  

Reviewing and approving and, when appropriate, recommending to our board of directors for approval, any employment agreements and any severance arrangements or plans for our executive officers.

•  

Evaluating its relationship with any compensation consultant for any conflicts of interest and assessing the independence of any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisors.

The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hasi.com. In April 2022, our board of directors amended the Compensation Committee charter to make the Compensation Committee primarily responsible for administering the 2022 plan and for making grants under the plan.

Independence

Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Consultant

Since 2018, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”), a compensation consulting firm, to assist the Compensation Committee on the setting of certain annual bonus targets for our NEOs. In July 2019, the Compensation Committee also engaged Pay Governance to provide analysis and recommendations regarding (1) base salaries, annual bonuses and long-term incentive compensation for our executive management team, and (2) the director compensation program for non-employee members of our board of directors. Pay Governance was also engaged in March 2021 to evaluate the benefits of adopting a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice and Anti-Racism (“DEIJA”) policy as well as proposing various performance standards related to the promotion of such policy as it relates to the composition of the members of our board of directors and leadership team against which annual CEO compensation would be evaluated by our board of directors. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee has determined that Pay Governance is independent pursuant to the Company’s Compensation Committee charter.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. No member of the compensation committee is a current or former officer or employee of ours or any of our subsidiaries. Other than Mr. Eckel and Mr. Lipson’s service both as executive officers and as members of our board of directors, none of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any company that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Report

The Compensation Committee Report is set forth beginning on page 57 of this Proxy Statement.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  21

 

NGCR Committee

Current Members

Teresa M. Brenner (Chair)
Clarence D. Armbrister
Michael T. Eckhart
Charles M. O’Neil

Primary Responsibilities

•  

Reviewing periodically and making recommendations to our board of directors on the range of qualifications that should be represented on our board of directors and eligibility criteria for individual board membership.

•   

Seeking, considering and recommending to our board qualified candidates for election as directors and approving and recommending to the full board of directors the election of each of our officers and, if necessary, a lead independent director.

•  

Reviewing and making recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our board of directors and our corporate governance and annually recommends nominees for each committee of our board of directors.

•  

Reviewing the Company’s strategies, activities, policies, and communications regarding sustainability and other ESG related matters, including our CarbonCount® score, and making recommendations to our board of directors with respect thereto.

•  

Annually facilitating the assessment of our board of directors performance as a whole and that of the individual directors and reports thereon to our board of directors

The specific responsibilities of the NGCR Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hasi.com.

Independence

Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of the NGCR Committee is independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the NGCR Committee.

 

Finance and Risk Committee

Current Members

Charles M. O’Neil (Chair)
Clarence D. Armbrister
Michael T. Eckhart
Nancy C. Floyd
Kimberly A. Reed

Primary Responsibilities

•  

Assessing, monitoring and overseeing matters relating to the Company’s financings.

•  

Discussing and reviewing policies and guidelines with respect to our risk assessment and risk management for various risks, including, but not limited to, our interest rate, counter party, credit, capital availability, refinancing and certain environmental risks.

•  

Reviewing and assessing the adequacy of our insurance coverage.

•  

Reviewing and assessing the adequacy of our cybersecurity policies and programs.

The specific responsibilities of the Finance and Risk Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available for viewing on our website at www.hasi.com.

Independence

Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Finance and Risk Committee are independent under the NYSE listing standards, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Finance and Risk Committee.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  22

ESG OVERSIGHT

We recognize the importance of understanding, evaluating, and monitoring ESG-related opportunities and risks as part of our vision and strategy. The NGCR Committee is responsible for periodically reviewing our strategies, activities, and policies including our Sustainability Investment Policy, Environmental Policies, and Human Rights and Human Capital Management Policies.

 

HASI Board of Directors

NGCR Committee

 

President and CEO

 

ESG Leadership Team

HASI
Foundation Leadership Team
ESG Reporting
Frameworks Committee
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and
Anti-Racism (DEIJA) Working Group

ROLERESPONSIBILITIES
Board of DirectorsFormal adoption of ESG strategy and policies and oversight of implementation
NGCR CommitteeRecommendation of new ESG policies and oversight of implementation
President and CEOPrioritization and oversight of staff and company resources dedicated to the implementation of ESG initiatives
ESG Leadership TeamReports to the Executive Chair, CEO and Nominating, Governance, and Corporate Responsibility Committee andis responsible for informing strategy, setting performance milestones, and designating responsibilities
Strategic Initiatives and ESGDevelopment of ESG strategy, execution of initiatives, and integration of engagement with ESG rating agencies,ESG-focused investors, and other stakeholders
AccountingTracking, verifying, and reporting ESG (including PCAF-aligned emissions metrics) metrics in public financialfilings
LegalReview of ESG disclosures and ensuring validation of adherence to ESG policies
Human ResourcesDevelopment and implementation DEIJA principles in employee recruitment, retention, promotion, andengagement initiatives
HASI Foundation Leadership TeamDevelopment and implementation of corporate philanthropic strategy
Working GroupDevelopment and implementation of DEIJA initiatives
ESG Reporting FrameworksCommitteeAssessment of how climate change-related risks and opportunities impact investments
Capital MarketsExecution of green and CarbonCount-based debt issuances
Investor RelationsCollection of investor feedback on ESG performance and initiatives
InvestmentsCarbonCount assessments and monitoring of climate investment risks and opportunities
CommunicationsFostering and maintaining authentic and strategic stakeholder relationships in support of ESG strategy
Portfolio ManagementAssessment of portfolio exposure to climate risks and opportunities

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  23

For Your Reference 

For additional information on our ESG strategy, policies,
and initiatives (including the below documents), please visit investors.hasi.com and hasi.com/ESG.

•  Annual Report

•  Proxy Statement

•  Sustainability Investment Policy

•  Environmental Policies

•  Human Rights Statement

•  Human Capital Management Policies

•  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

•  Business Partner Code of Conduct

•  Environmental Metrics

•  Sustainability Report Card

Risk Oversight

In connection with their oversight of risk to our business, our board of directors considers feedback from management concerning the risks related to our business, operations and strategies. The Finance and Risk Committee of our board of directors has the responsibility to discuss and review policies with respect to our risk assessment and risk management, including, but not limited to, guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management is undertaken, the adequacy of our insurance coverage, our interest rate risk management, our counter-partycounterparty and credit risks, our capital availability, our refinancing risks, and our cybersecurity risk. OurThe Audit Committee also consults with the Finance and Risk Committee on certain of these matters. Management regularly reports to our board of directors on our leverage policies, our asset acquisition process, any asset impairments



and our compliance with applicable REIT and Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, rules. Members of our board of directors routinely meet with management in connection with their consideration of matters submitted for the approval of our board of directors and the risks associated with such matters.

Cybersecurity

We recognize how critical cybersecurity and cyber resilience are to the well-being of our organization, our business stakeholders, and the information we rely on to profitably operate. The proliferation of global cyber risks continually transforms the cyber risk landscape, which requires our cybersecurity and training programs to constantly adapt and evolve, under the strategic direction of the Finance and Risk Committee.

Identifying and addressing these cyber threats while upholding our principles of governance, internal controls, and transparency is a priority for our cybersecurity program. The Finance and Risk Committee and management collectively provide oversight of our information technology and cybersecurity program, which is led by our chief technology officer and supported by a skilled and high performing team of technology professionals.

Our focused cyber and information security strategy incorporates components of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Common Standards Framework, certain Center for Internet Security benchmarks, as well as Information Technology Library components to suit our organization’s unique cybersecurity needs. Our deliberately limited disclosure of specific framework alignments is meant to minimize risks to our IT security.

Our IT infrastructure deploys a best-in-class technology stack supported by proven vendors whose services address the range of risks identified by the Finance and Risk Committee and internal cybersecurity apparatus.

Annual Board of Directors and Committee Assessments

Our board of directors believes thatand each of its composition protects stockholder interestscommittees conducts an annual self-assessment process, implemented and provides sufficient independent oversight of management. A supermajority ofoverseen by our current directors are “independent” under NYSE listing standards, as more fully described elsewhereNGCR Committee in this section under “Corporate Governance and Social and Environmental Responsibility—Director Independence.” The independent directors, led by Ms. Brenner, our Lead Independent Director, meet separately from management at least four times a year and are active inorder to review the oversight of the Company. The independent directors oversee such critical matters as the integrity of our financial statements, the evaluation and compensation of executive officers and the selection and evaluation of directors. Each independent director has the ability to add items to the agendaeffectiveness of our board of directors meetingsand its committees. The formal self-evaluation may be in the form of written or raise subjectsoral questionnaires and may be administered by board members and/or by third parties, as determined appropriate by our NGCR Committee for discussion that are not on the agenda for that meeting.

Ms. Brenner works withrelated performance cycle. Director feedback is solicited at both the chairmanboard and committee levels. The results of our board of directors and committee self-assessments are compiled and presented to establishour board of directors, and items identified in the agenda for regularself-assessments requiring follow-up are monitored on an ongoing basis by our board of directors and by management. In addition to the formal annual board and committee evaluation process, our Lead Independent Director speaks with each board member at least quarterly, and receives input regarding board and committee practices and management oversight. Throughout the year, committee members also have the opportunity to provide input directly to committee chairs or to management.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  24
Director Attendance

The following table shows director attendance, either in person, telephonically or via videoconference, at meetings of our board of directors servesand of the committees of our board of directors for the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022:

 Number of Meetings Attendance(1)
Board of Directors11 98%
Audit Committee12 95%
Compensation Committee8 100%
Finance & Risk Committee7 93%
NGCR Committee7 100%
(1)Ms. Ardisana joined our board of directors in October 2022. As a result, solely with respect to the attendance of Ms. Ardisana, this information reflects her attendance since their appointment to our board of directors. Further, as Mr. Lipson and Ms. Reed were appointed to our board of directors in March 2023, this information does not reflect their attendance at any 2022 board meetings.

All the directors then serving on our board of directors attended our 2022 virtual annual meeting of stockholders and all directors currently serving on our board of directors intend to attend our Annual Meeting. Our board of directors’ policy, as chair of regularset forth in the Guidelines, is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors when our chairman is absent, presides at executive sessions, serves as a liaison between our chairman and chief executive officer and our independent directors, and encourages dialogue between our independent directors and management. She also establishes the agenda forall meetings of our independent directors and performs such other duties as our board of directors may establish or delegate.

Our board of directors believes that its supermajority independent composition and the roles that our independent directors perform provide effective corporate governance at our board of directors’ level and independent oversight of both our board of directors and management. The current governance structure, when combined with the functioning of the independent director component of our board of directors and our overall corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent oversight of our business and affairs.
stockholders.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND REVIEW

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted athe Code of Conduct, thatwhich applies to our directors, executive officers, employees, agents, representatives, and employees.consultants. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist in complying with the law, in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise and in complying with our policies and procedures. Among the areas addressed by the Code of Conduct are compliance with applicable governmental, state and local laws, compliance with securities laws, the use and protection of company assets, data privacy, the protection of our confidential corporate information, dealings with the press and communications with the public, internal accounting controls, improper influence of audits, records retention, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment, health and safety, and conflicts of interest, including payments and gifts by third parties, outside financial interests that might be in conflict with our interests, access to our confidential records, corporate opportunities, and loans. The Code of Conduct is available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.www.hasi.com. We will also provide the Code of Conduct, free of charge, to stockholders who request it. Requests should be directed to Steven L. Chuslo, our general counsel, executive vice president, chief legal officer and secretary, at Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, Maryland 21401.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our board of directors has adopted the Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which our board of directors carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Guidelines are the composition of our board of directors, its functions and responsibilities, its standing committees, director qualification standards, access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, management succession, director orientation and continuing education and the annual performance evaluation and review of our board of directors and committees. The Guidelines are available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com.www.hasi.com. We will also provide the Guidelines, free of charge, to stockholders who request it. Requests should be directed to Steven L. Chuslo, our general counsel, executive vice president, chief legal officer and secretary, at Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, Maryland 21401.

Majority Vote

Whistleblower Policy
The Guidelines provide for a majority vote policy for the election of directors. Pursuant to this policy, in

Our Whistleblower Policy sets forth procedures by which any uncontested election of directors, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation to our board of directors following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee shall promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee shall consider all factors it deems relevant, which may include the stated reasons, if any, why stockholders withheld votes from the director, any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes, the length of service and qualifications of the director, the director’s past and expected



future contributions to the Company, the composition of our board of directors, and such other information and factors as members of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee shall determine are relevant.
Our board of directors will act on the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days after the certification of the stockholder vote. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participateCovered Persons (as defined in the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee’s considerationWhistleblower Policy) may report, on a confidential basis, concerns relating to any questionable or board action regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation.
We will promptly disclose our board of director’s decision whether to accept the resignation as tendered (providing a full explanation of the process by which the decision was reached and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation) in a press release, a filing with the SECunethical accounting, internal accounting controls or in another broadly disseminated means of communication.
Director Independence
The Guidelines provide that a majority of the directors serving on our board of directors must be independent as required by NYSE listing standards. In addition, as permitted under the MGCL, our board of directors has adopted certain independence standards (the “Independence Standards”) to assist it in making determinations with respect to the independence of directors. The Independence Standards are available for viewing on our website at www.hannonarmstrong.com. Based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that six of our seven current directors—Teresa Brenner, Michael Eckhart, Simone Lagomarsino, Charles O’Neil, Richard Osborne and Steven Osgood—qualify as independent directors under the NYSE listing standards and the Independence Standards.
Identification of Director Candidates
In accordance with the Guidelines and its written charter, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee is responsible for identifying director candidates for our board of directors and for recommending director candidates to our board of directors for consideration as nominees to stand for election at our annual meetings of stockholders. Director candidates are recommended for nomination for election as directors in accordance with the procedures set forth in the written charter of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee.
We seek highly qualified director candidates from diverse business, professional and educational backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee periodically reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the current composition of our board of directors, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In accordance with the Guidelines, directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, exercise good business judgment, be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders and have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews director candidates with the objective of assembling a slate of directors that can best fulfill and promote our goals, taking into consideration personal factors and professional characteristics of each potential candidate, and recommends director candidates based upon contributions they can make to our board of directors and management and their ability to represent our long-term interests and those of our stockholders.
The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee evaluates the skill sets required for service on our board of directors and has developed a list of potential director candidates. If it is determined there is the need for additional or replacement board members, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee will assess potential director candidates included on the listauditing matters, as well as otherany potential Code of Conduct or ethics violations. We maintain a confidential hotline for reporting potential violations. All reports will be taken seriously, we will fully investigate each allegation and, when appropriate, potential director candidates based upon information it receives regarding such potential candidates or otherwise possesses, which assessment may be supplemented by additional inquiries. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee considers knowledge, experience, skills, diversity and such other factors as it deemstake appropriate in light of our current needs and those of our board of directors. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee may seek input on such director candidates from other directors, including the chairman and chief executive officer, and recommends director candidates to our board of directors for nomination. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee does not solicit director nominations, but it will consider recommendations by stockholders with respect to elections to be held at an annual meeting, so long as such recommendationsaction. Reports are sent on a timely basis and in accordance with applicable law. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee will evaluate nominees recommended by stockholders against the same criteria that it uses to evaluate other nominees. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee may, in its sole discretion, engage one or more search firms or other consultants, experts or professionals to assist in, among other things, identifying director candidates or gathering information regarding the background and experience of director candidates. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee will have sole authority to approve any fees or terms of retention relating to these services.


Our stockholders of record who comply with the advanced notice procedures set forth in our current Bylaws and outlined under the “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section of this proxy statement may nominate candidates for election as directors. Our Bylaws currently provide that stockholder nominations of director candidates for an annual meeting of stockholders must be received no earlier than the 150th day and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the 120th day priorsolely to the first anniversarychair of the dateAudit Committee, the chair of the proxy statement forNGCR Committee and the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, inchief legal officer (unless such person is the event that the datesubject of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder, to be timely, must be so delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the later of the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting, as originally convened, or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Accordingly, to submit a director candidate for consideration for nomination atapplicable report). Since our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders must submit the recommendation,IPO in writing, by 5:00 p.m., Eastern time on December 15, 2020, but in no event earlier than November 15, 2020. The written notice must set forth the information and include the materials required by our current Bylaws. The advanced notice procedures set forth in our current Bylaws do not affect the right of stockholders to request the inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules. See “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” for information regarding providing timely notice of stockholder proposals under SEC rules.2013, we have never received any whistleblower reports.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  25
Annual Board of Directors and Committee Assessments
Back to Contents

Our board of directors and each of its committees conducts an annual self-assessment process, implemented and overseen by our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee in order to review the effectiveness of our board of directors and its committees. The formal self-evaluation may be in the form of written or oral questionnaires and may be administered by board members and/or by third parties, as determined appropriate by our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee for the related performance cycle. Director feedback is solicited at both the board and committee levels. The results of our board of directors and committee self-assessments are compiled and presented to our board of directors, and items identified in the self-assessments requiring follow-up are monitored on an ongoing basis by our board of directors and by management. In addition to the formal annual board and committee evaluation process, our Lead Independent Director speaks with each board member at least quarterly, and receives input regarding board and committee practices and management oversight. Throughout the year, committee members also have the opportunity to provide input directly to committee chairs or to management.
Personal Loans to Executive Officers and Directors

We comply with, and operate in a manner consistent with, applicable law prohibiting extensions of credit in the form of personal loans to or for the benefit of our directors and executive officers.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
We have scheduled a board meeting in conjunction with the Annual Meeting

Corporate Governance Review

In overseeing our corporate policies and as set forth in the Guidelines, our policy is to encourageoverall performance and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings ofdirection, our board of directors has adopted the approach of operating in what it believes are the long-term best interests of the Company and allour stockholders. In operating under these principles, our board of directors continuously reviews our corporate governance structure and considers whether any changes are necessary or desirable.

ACTIVE STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH

We believe that engaging with investors is fundamental to our commitment to good governance and essential to maintaining our industry-leading practices. Throughout the year, we seek opportunities to connect with our investors to gain and share valuable insights into current and emerging business and governance trends.

In 2022, we held over 175 meetings with over 70 current investors, representing approximately 54%of our stockholders.
Communicationsshares of Common Stock outstanding as of the end of the year.

Topics discussed include our investment criteria, interest rate and other risk management practices, political and regulatory matters and our focus on sustainability and strong governance practices, including with respect to allowing our stockholders to amend our Bylaws. These meetings were conducted in person, via teleconference, via videoconference or one-on-one at industry conferences. Our engagement activities take place throughout the year and we also conduct quarterly earnings calls where we try to answer many of the new questions that we receive during our investor outreach.

MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING

Our board of directors recognizes that management succession planning is a fundamental and ongoing part of its responsibilities. Our NGCR Committee has utilized a framework relating to executive succession planning under which the NGCR Committee has defined specific criteria for, and responsibilities of, each of the executive officer roles of the Company. The NGCR Committee then focuses on the skill set needed to succeed in these roles both on a long-term and an emergency basis. Our Lead Independent Director also meets on this topic separately with our Board of Directors

chief executive officer and facilitates additional discussions with our independent directors about executive succession planning throughout the year, including at executive sessions. Succession planning remains a priority for our NGCR Committee, which has worked with Mr. Eckel and Mr. Lipson to ensure an appropriate emergency succession protocol and to develop our long-term succession plan.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors has approved a process to enable communications with the independent members of theour board of directors or the chair of any of the committees of theour board of directors. Communications by email should be sent to generalcounsel@hannonarmstrong.com.legaldepartment@hasi.com. Communications by regular mail should be sent to the attention of Steven L. Chuslo, our general counsel, executive vice president, chief legal officer and secretary, at our office at 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, MD 21401. Each communication received will be reviewed to determine whether the communication requires immediate action. All appropriate communications received, or a summary of such communications, will be sent to the appropriate member(s) of our board of directors. However, we reserve the right to disregard any communication we determine is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to us or our business, or is similarly inappropriate. Our secretary, or his or her delegate, has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.

In addition, any of our stockholders and any other person may make a good faith report to the Audit Committee regarding any questionable or unethical accounting or auditing matters via regular mail addressed to the Audit Committee, 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, MD 21401.

In addition, any of our stockholders and any other person may make a good faith report to the Lead Independent Director regarding any concerns via regular mail addressed to the Lead Independent Director, 1 Park Place, Suite 200, Annapolis, MD 21401.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  26

Executive Sessions

CLIMATE LEADERSHIP

We own and invest in a diversified portfolio of Independent Directors

The independent directors servingclimate solutions projects focused on reducing or mitigating the impacts of climate change. Under the direction of our chief executive officer and our board of directors, meetwe are focused on achieving a high level of environmental and social responsibility and strong corporate governance. The NGCR Committee is responsible for our ESG oversight, including related policies and communications. Additionally, we have a committee of employees from across our organization that is focused on implementing ESG strategies and policies and reports directly to our chief executive officer. Annually we publish a report that illustrates our progress on these matters.

Our business and business strategy are focused on addressing climate change, in executive sessions at least four times per year at regularly scheduled meetingspart through the reduction of carbon emissions that have been scientifically linked to climate change. As described under “Investment Strategy”, we quantify the carbon impact of each of our board of directors. These executive sessionsinvestments. In addition, we operate our business in a manner intended to reduce our own environmental impact, including by purchasing carbon-free renewable energy for our office, encouraging recycling and composting, and offering clean transportation employee incentives for electric and hybrid vehicles. We have also adopted policies focused on minimizing the environmental impact of our boardoperations.

Investment Strategy

Our vision is that every investment should improve our climate future, which is why we require that all prospective investments are neutral-to-negative on incremental carbon emissions or have some other tangible environmental benefit, such as reducing water consumption.

Based on decades of directors are presided over by our Lead Independent Director.

Active Stockholder Outreach
We believe that engaging with investors is fundamental to our commitment to good governance and essential to maintaining our industry-leading practices. Throughout the year, we seek opportunities to connect with our investors to gain and share valuable insights into current and emerging business and governance trends. During 2019, we held over 148 meetings with stockholders whose ownership represent approximately 37% of shares outstanding as of the end of the year to discuss various key corporate matters. Topics discussed include our investment criteria,experience across multiple interest rate and other risk management practices, politicalbusiness cycles, intermittent governmental support for reducing carbon emissions, and regulatory mattersseveral “boom and our focus on sustainability and strong governance practices, including with respect to allowing our stockholders to amend our bylaws. These meetings were conductedbust” cycles of business expansions in person, via teleconference or one-on-one at industry conferences. Our engagement activities take place throughout the year andclean energy markets, we also conduct quarterly earnings calls where we try to answer many of the new questions that we receive during our investor outreach.
Corporate Governance Review
In overseeing our corporate policies and our overall performance and direction, our board of directors has adopted the approach of operating in what it believes are the long-term best interests of the Company and our stockholders. In operating under these principles, our board of directors continuously reviews our corporate governance structure and considers whether any changes are necessary or desirable. As part of this review, our board of directors has adoptedhave created a number of corporate governance guidelines to better align the interests of our directors with those of our stockholders, including those set forth above. As part of this review, our board of directors also considered amending our bylaws to allow our stockholders (without the concurrence of our board of directors) to implement bylaw amendments. After careful consideration of this matter and discussion with some of our larger stockholders, our board of directors has determined that at this time, it remains in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company that the authority to amend our bylaws continues to remain vested exclusively in our board of directors as is permitted by Maryland law and which has been the case since our IPO in 2013. We continue to monitor and evaluate developments on this issue.
Management Succession Planning

Our board of directors recognizes that management succession planning is a fundamental and ongoing part of its responsibilities. Our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee has utilized a framework relating to executive succession planning under which the Committee has defined specific criteria for, and responsibilities of, each of the executive officer roles of the Company. The Committee then focuses on the skill set needed to succeed in these roles both on a long-term and an emergency basis. Our Lead Independent Director also meets on this topic separately with our CEO and facilitates additional discussions with our independent directors about executive succession planning throughout the year, including at executive sessions. Succession planning remains a priority for our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, which has worked with Mr. Eckel to ensure an appropriate emergency succession protocol and to develop our long-term succession plan.
Environmental Impact
With scientific consensus that global warming trends are linked to human activities and resulting in various extreme weather events, we believe the Company is well positioned to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns by investing in, and managing a portfolio of, assets that address climate-changing greenhouse gas emissions. Further, with increasing weather related events, we see similar investment opportunities in infrastructure assets that mitigate the impact of, and increase the resiliency to, these weather events and other adverse impacts of climate change.
Our climate-positive investment thesis is based on the following theories:the tenets:

1)More efficient technologies are more productive and thus should lead to higher economic returns.
2)Lower portfolio risk is inherent in a portfolio of diverse investments, generated by trends of increasing decentralization and digitalization of energy assets, compared to a portfolio comprised solely of centralized utility-scale investments.
3)Investing in assets aligned with scientific consensus and universal social values will reduce potential regulatory and social costs through better internalization of externalities.
4)Assets that reduce carbon emissions represent an embedded option that may increase in value if regulations were to set a price on carbon emissions.

Our Impact

6.6 million6.3 billion
Cumulative metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) avoided annually through our investments, the equivalent to eliminating emissions from over 1.4 million typical passenger vehiclesCumulative gallons of water saved annually from our investments, the equivalent to eliminating the annual water consumption of nearly 138,000 U.S. homes every year
~400,000~300,000~2 million
Quality jobs created by
our investments in 48 states
School children supported by our energy efficiency upgrades to educational facilities and transportation funded by our investmentsVeterans served by hospitals and other facilities that received energy efficiency upgrades funded by our investments

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  27
More efficient technologies are more productive
Back to Contents

TCFD METRICS AND TARGETS

In assessing our operational and thus should lead to higher economic returns;

Lower portfolio risk is inherent in a portfolio of smaller investments, generated by trends of increasing decentralization and digitalization of energy assets, compared to larger, centralized utility-scale investments;
Investing in assets aligned with scientific consensus and society’s general beliefs will reduce potential regulatory and social costs through better internalization of externalities; and
Assets that reduce carbon emissions represent an embedded option that may increase in value if carbon regulations were to set a price on carbon emissions.


As part of our investment process,financial performance, we calculate the ratioenvironmental profile of the estimated first yearour business operations and infrastructure investments using a combination of metric tons ofwell-established reporting protocols and proprietary tools for measuring carbon emissions avoided by our investments divided by the capital invested to understand the impact our investments are having on climate change. In this calculation, which we refer to as CarbonCount®, we use emissions factor data, expressed on a CO2 equivalent basis, from the U.S. Government or the International Energy Administration to an estimate of a project’s energy production or savings to compute an estimate of metric tons of carbon emissions avoided. We estimate that our investments originated in 2019 will reduce annual carbon emissions by approximately 385 thousand metric tons.
In assessing our performance and results of operations, we also consider the impact of our operations on the environment. We utilize the carbon emissions categorizations established by the World Resources Institute Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standards to set goals and calculate our estimated emissions. The categorizations are as follows:

Scope 1 GHG emissions - Direct emissions - Emissions from operations that are owned or controlled by the reporting company.

Scope 2 GHG emissions - Indirect emissions - Emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired energy such as electricity, steam, heating or cooling, consumed by the reporting company.

Scope 3 GHG emissions - Indirect emissions - All other indirect emissions that occur in the value chain of the reporting company, including both upstream and downstream emissions.
The table below illustrates our goals and performance for 2019 in metric tons ("MT").
water savings.

(1)CarbonCount is a scoring tool that evaluates investments in U.S.-based energy efficiency and renewable energy projects to estimate the expected CO2 emission reduction per $1,000 of investment.
(2)WaterCount is a scoring tool that evaluates investments in U.S.-based projects to estimate the expected water consumption reduction per $1,000 of investment.
Category(3)GoalPerformance
Verification (3)
Expressed in metric tons (MT).
Scope 1 GHG emissions(4)0 MT0 MTApex Cos.
Scope 2 GHG emissions0 MT
0 MT (1)
Apex Cos.
Scope 3 GHG emissions
  0 MT2
<600 MT (2)
Apex Cos.

(1)
Performance stated is market-based which includes the impact of purchasing renewable energy credits.
(2)Our stated actual performance for Scope 3 GHG emissions does not include the carbon emissions reductions as a result of our investments. The first year carbon emissions reductions as a result of our investments originated in 2019 are 385 Thousand MT.
(3)In addition to our internal review, Apex Companies, LLC was commissioned as an independent organization to verify our GHG emissions reporting as estimated in accordance with GHG measurement and reporting protocols of the World Resources Institute (WRI) / World Business Council for Sustainable Development Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 1 and 2) and Corporate Value Chain Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 3).
(5)Scope 3, Categories 1-14. See Science-Based Targets Initiative – Scope 3 Emissions Targets on page 29 of this Proxy Statement for additional reporting. Verification in progress.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  28

SCIENCE-BASED TARGETS INITIATIVE

In 2021, we submitted Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets for verification by the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi). SBTi defines and promotes best practices in emissions reductions and net-zero targets in line with the latest climate science to provide companies with independent assessment and target validation. Decarbonizing with science-based targets solidifies our GHG emissions reduction roadmap, another key step to combat climate change that competitively positions us as leaders in the broader transition to a net-zero economy.

GHG PROTOCOLTARGETSTATUS (2022)
Scope 1Commitment to reduce absolute emissions 100% by 2030 from a 2019 base year0 MT CO2e
Scope 2
(market-based method)
Commitment to reduce absolute emissions 100% by 2030 from a 2019 base year0 MT CO2e
Scope 3
Categories 1-14
Plan to set target for all Category 1-14 emissions by EOY23311 MT CO2e
Category 15Commitment to continue providing project finance in the power sector only for assets that result in avoided emissions and/or generate other environmental benefits (e.g., renewable electricity, energy storage, etc.) through 203042,604 MT CO2e
Plan to set additional target for all Category 15 financed emissions by EOY23

Scope 3 Emissions Targets

Once we have finalized the quantification of nearly all of our Scope 3, Category 15 (financed) emissions in line with the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) standards and in support of our Net-Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) commitment, we plan to set Scope 3 targets by the end of 2023. We plan to report our progress toward these targets in upcoming years.

  2022
PORTFOLIO/SECURITIZED TOTAL
OUTSTANDING
LOAN AND
INVESTMENTS
COVERED (X $M)
 % OF
TOTAL
MANAGED
ASSETS
 EMISSIONS
(tCO2e)
 EMISSION
INTENSITY
(tCO2e/$M)
 WEIGHTED
DATA
QUALITY
SCORE(2)
 AVOIDED
EMISSIONS
(tCO2e)
 AVOIDED
EMISSION
INTENSITY
(tCO2e/$M)
Securitized Project Finance 0 0%    1   
Portfolio Project Finance 4,018 41% 42,175 10 3 2,563,514 2,019
Portfolio Business Loans and Preferred Equity 24 0% 429 18 5    
  Total Portfolio Assessed 4,042 41% 42,604 11 3    
  Total Managed Assets Assessed 4,042 41% 42,604 11 3 2,563,514 2,019
Portfolio Unassessed 307 3%          
Securitized Unassessed 5,445 56%          
  Total Unassessed(1) 5,752 59%          
    9,794            
(1)Unassessed portion of our managed assets includes energy efficiency projects which employ solar power generation, electric storage, or energy efficiency improvements such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems (HVAC), lighting, energy controls, roofs, windows, building shells, and/or combined heat and power system for which emissions data is not presently available.
(2)By its very nature, the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions is subject to various estimates and assumptions. In order to inform users of the emissions data as to the nature of the estimates and assumptions used, the PCAF standard prescribes Data Quality scores which reporting companies are to use (from 1 – 5, with 1 being the best quality data) reflecting the extent to which calculations are reliant on estimates and assumptions. We plan to increase our data quality scores in subsequent years as we increase our access to emissions data associated with our projects.
HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  29
  2021
PORTFOLIO/SECURITIZED TOTAL
OUTSTANDING
LOAN AND
INVESTMENTS
COVERED (X $M)
 % OF TOTAL
MANAGED
ASSETS
 EMISSIONS
(tCO2e)
 EMISSION
INTENSITY
(tCO2e/$M)
 WEIGHTED
DATA
QUALITY
SCORE(2)
 AVOIDED
EMISSIONS
(tCO2e)
 AVOIDED
EMISSION
INTENSITY
(tCO2e/$M)
Securitized Other Sustainable Infrastructure (Securitized Assets) 3,288 37% 19,986 6 1    
Portfolio Project Finance 3,394 39% 28,487 8 3 2,319,117 683
Portfolio Business Loans and Preferred Equity 33 0% 579 18 5    
  Total Portfolio Assessed 3,427 39% 29,066 8 3    
  Total Managed Assets Assessed 6,715 76% 49,052 7 4 2,319,117 345
Portfolio Unassessed 189 2%          
Securitized Unassessed 1,875 21%          
  Total Unassessed(1) 2,064 24%          
    8,779            
(1)Unassessed portion of our managed assets includes energy efficiency projects which employ solar power generation, electric storage, or energy efficiency improvements such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems (HVAC), lighting, energy controls, roofs, windows, building shells, and/or combined heat and power system for which emissions data is not presently available.
(2)By its very nature, the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions is subject to various estimates and assumptions. In order to inform users of the emissions data as to the nature of the estimates and assumptions used, the PCAF standard prescribes Data Quality scores which reporting companies are to use (from 1 – 5, with 1 being the best quality data) reflecting the extent to which calculations are reliant on estimates and assumptions. We plan to increase our data quality scores in subsequent years as we increase our access to emissions data associated with our projects.

HASI INTERNAL CARBON PRICE

In keeping with our historic leadership on climate positive investing and absent a national or global policy-mandated carbon price, we affirmed in 2022 the best practice of investors and corporate issuers by establishing an internal price of carbon for the emissions associated with both business operations and investments. We believe instituting an internal carbon price encourages transparent emissions reporting, and exemplifies and encourages long-term climate positive investments.

Methodology

According to a recent McKinsey analysis1, approximately 30% of financial services firms surveyed have instituted an internal carbon price. Of these firms, the median fee per metric ton of CO2e is just $6 whereas the carbon price range required to meet Paris Agreement emissions goals is $40 to $80.

We have set an internal carbon price of $100/tCO2e, which is in line with current best-in-class internal corporate carbon prices and almost double the price of $51/tCO2e determined by U.S. Government’s Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon.

At the end of each year, we sum the Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 (including Category 15) carbon emissions from the prior year.

We then net the avoided emissions associated with our investments as of the end of the most recent year against only our Scope 3 Category 15 emissions, if any. If the result of this calculation is less than zero, we simply assign a value of zero to this subtotal. Note that we do not net avoided financed emissions (Scope 3 Category 15) against Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions.

We strongly believe that all companies should report the avoided emissions associated with their investments. Further, allowing companies to net their avoided financed emissions against their Scope 3 Category 15 emissions supports the allocation of capital in accordance with long-term climate positive investment strategies.

(1)McKinsey, The State of Internal Carbon Pricing (February 2021)

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  30
HASI Internal Carbon Pricing Calculation (FY22)

Scope 1 Emissions (tCO2e)0
Scope 2 (Market-Based) Emissions (tCO2e)0
Scope 3 (Categories 1-14) Emissions (tCO2e)311
Scope 3 (Category 15) Emissions (tCO2e)42,604
Total Gross Emissions (tCO2e)42,915
“Scope 4” Avoided Financed Emissions (EOY22; tCO2e)(615,000)
Net Scope 3 (Category 15) Emissions (tCO2e)(572,085)
Total Net Emissions (tCO2e)311
HASI Internal Carbon Price ($/tCO2e)$100
HASI Internal Carbon Fee (FY22)$31,100

Use of Proceeds from Internal Carbon Fee

Each year, the total internal fee for CO2 emissions is donated to the HASI Foundation as a component of the company’s annual Social Dividend.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  31

GREEN DEBT LEADERSHIP

Overview

For corporate unsecured debt, we typically pursue independent verification to ensure alignment with our Green Bond Framework, which has been developed in accordance with the ICMA’s Green Bond Principles. Since 2013, we have raised approximately $8.7 billion of green debt, including securitizations and non-recourse and corporate issuances. In 2022, we issued more than $1.5 billion in green CarbonCount-based debt.

In late 2022, HASI closed a Term Loan A compliant with the Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles, which introduced the concept of an assurance provider for our proprietary CarbonCount metric and a subsequent reduction in interest rate if particular CarbonCount thresholds are achieved.

Green Debt Issuances

Sustainable Yield Bonds Off Balance Sheet

Securitizations typically of public sector receivables and managed off balance sheet

Sustainable Yield Bonds On Balance Sheet

Non-recourse, asset-backed debt managed on balance sheet

Corporate Green Bonds

Senior unsecured or convertible bonds issued as corporate obligations

Other Green Debt

Syndicate Sustainability-Linked Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit and Term Loan A and Green Carbon Count Commercial Paper Program2

(1)From 2013 IPO through 12/31/22.
(2)Represents total commitments of our Sustainability-Linked Unsecured RLOC, Sustainability-Linked Term Loan A, and Green Carbon Count Commercial Paper Program. As of 12/31/22, our outstanding debt under the Sustainability-Linked Unsecured RLOC, Sustainability-Linked Term Loan A, and Green Carbon Count Commercial Paper Program was $0m, $383m and $0m, respectively.
(3)ICMA’s Green Bond Principles applicable to corporate unsecured green bonds and convertible green bonds due 2023 but not necessarily to convertible green bonds due 2022

Corporate Green Bonds

SECURITY
NAME
 INDEPENDENT
VERIFIER
 CUSIP MATURITY
DATE
 ISSUED
VOLUME
 COUPON
RATE
 CONVERSION
PREMIUM
    BOND
TYPE
 RATINGS CarbonCount®1
HASI-GRB-002 Ernst and Young 418751AB94/15/2025 $400,000,000 6.00% N/A Senior Unsecured Moody’s: Baa3 S&P: BB+ Fitch: BB+ 2.01
HASI-GRB-003 Ernst and Young 418751AD59/15/2030 $375,000,000 3.75% N/A Senior Unsecured Moody’s: Baa3 S&P: BB+ Fitch: BB+ 0.35
HASI-GRB-004 Ernst and Young 41068XAD28/15/2023 $143,750,000 0.00% 27.50% Convertible Senior Unsecured S&P: BB+ Fitch: BB+ 0.29
HASI-GRB-005 Ernst and Young 418751AE36/15/2026 $1,000,000,000 3.38% N/A Senior Unsecured Moody’s: Baa3 S&P: BB+ 0.39
HASI-GRB-006 In Process 418751AG85/1/2025 $200,000,000 0%2 32.50% Exchangeable Note -   0.24

Green CarbonCount® Commercial Paper

SECURITY
NAME
 INDEPENDENT
VERIFIER
 MATURITY
DATE
 ISSUED
VOLUME
 DEBT
TYPE
 CarbonCount®1 AVOIDED
EMISSIONS3
 RENEWABLE
OR AVOIDED
GENERATION3
 TECHNO-
LOGY
 GEO-
GRAPHIC
 MARKET
HASI-GCCP-001 Ernst and Young 3/10/2022 $50,250,000 Green Commercial Paper 1.66 0 (2021) 0 (2021) Wind National GC
(1)This is the CarbonCount® metric resulting from the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering to specific Eligible Green Projects. CarbonCount® is the ratio of the estimated first year of metric tons of carbon emissions avoided (or that will be avoided) by the investment divided by the capital to be invested to understand the impact the investment is expected to have on climate change. In this calculation, we use emissions factor data, expressed on a CO2 equivalent basis, from the U.S. Government or the International Energy Administration to estimate a project’s energy production or savings to compute an estimate of metric tons of carbon emissions that will be avoided. In addition to carbon, we also consider other environmental attributes, such as water use reduction, stormwater remediation benefits, or stream restoration benefits.
(2)The 2025 Exchangeable Senior Notes accrete to a premium at maturity equal to 3.25%. The accreted balance as of December 31, 2022 is $205 million. Upon any exchange, holders will receive a number of shares of our common stock based equal to the product of (1) the aggregate initial principal amount of the notes to be exchanged divided by $1,000 and (2) the applicable exchange rate.
(3)Avoided emissions and generation for 2021 are zero as the projects to which these proceeds were allocated were not placed in service until 2022.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  32

CARBONCOUNT 2.0 GREATER ACCURACY, GRANULARITY OF EMISSIONS MODELING

CarbonCount is a decision tool that evaluates investments in U.S.-based carbon-free energy, energy efficiency, and climate resilience projects to determine how efficiently they reduce CO2 equivalent (CO2e)1 emissions per $1,000 of investment. CarbonCount integrates forward-looking project assumptions, emissions factors, and capital investment to produce a quantitative impact assessment for use by investors, developers, corporate buyers, policymakers, and other stakeholders interested in most efficiently avoiding emissions that contribute to climate change.

At its core, CarbonCount is a capital efficiency metric. Given that carbon counts and capital is scarce, investors should prioritize investments with high-impact CO2e emissions reductions. HASI uses CarbonCount to screen each new investment opportunity to ensure that every investment improves our climate future.

CarbonCount is also a crucial tool for businesses developing net-zero targets and clean energy procurement plans. It is imperative that such businesses use carbon-denominated measurements like CarbonCount to evaluate procurement and more accurately match emissions generated with emissions avoided. Many existing corporate net-zero targets use megawatt hours (“MWh”) as the basis for calculating actual and avoided emissions through execution of renewable energy power purchase agreements (PPAs) and renewable energy credit (REC) purchases. However, simply relying on offsetting consumption at a particular time and location with PPAs and/or RECs – often generated at a different time and location – can lead to wide gaps between traditional emissions accounting and actual emissions impact.

As a result, many conflate reductions in GHG Protocol Scope 2 market-based inventories with reductions in actual emissions, which is often not the case. Such gaps distort the market signals that influence project siting, power market congestion, and prices and can lead to a sub-optimal allocation of capital.

Leading the Evolution of Carbon Accounting

In early 2022, HASI launched a company-wide effort to reevaluate and modernize the CarbonCount calculation to improve its granularity and accuracy. CarbonCount will still be measured in metric tons of CO2e avoided per $1,000 invested, achieving the objective of evaluating the efficiency of investing capital in avoiding emissions. CarbonCount 2.0 will now reflect a more sophisticated and accurate assessment of avoided emissions by reporting year-one avoided emissions informed by more granular emissions data.

The primary driver of the update is the availability of more accurate and granular emissions modeling through our partnerships with REsurety and WattTime – leaders in advanced emissions factor modeling. Rather than estimating avoided emissions on an average annual basis using the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) eGRID emissions factors, the new CarbonCount 2.0 methodology assesses avoided emissions using locational marginal emissions factors that reflect the grid composition specific to each project’s location at the time of generation.

CarbonCount 2.0 Methodology

Launched in early 2023, the CarbonCount 2.0 methodology more precisely evaluates the efficiency of new investments to avoid carbon emissions. The primary methodological update that improves the accuracy of the metric utilizes improved location-specific hourly grid emissions factors known as locational marginal emissions factors instead of relying solely on the EPA’s eGRID average annual statewide emissions factors. Going forward, we will report this year-one CarbonCount informed by the location-specific hourly grid emissions factors.

(1)CO2 equivalent emissions includes the impact of greenhouse gas emissions beyond CO2 such as methane and normalizes impact in terms of units of CO2 equivalent adjusting for the often higher global warming potential of such other greenhouse gas emissions per metric ton. For instance, one metric ton of methane is equivalent to approximately 30 metric tons of CO2 in terms of global warming potential

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  33

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

HUMAN RIGHTS

Respect for human rights is a fundamental value of HASI. We strive to respect and promote human rights in accordance with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the United Nations Global Compact in our relationships with our employees, suppliers and the communities where we operate.

Human Rights Assessment, Mitigation, and Remedy

We conduct an annual internal human rights assessment. Our approach to this assessment allows us to map human rights risks by evaluating business partners and their respective policies. Business partners may be requested to provide an assessment of their respective political and regulatory environments, to ensure compliance with existing Human Rights and Human Capital Management Policies. To the extent that we become aware of violations or the risk of violations including but not limited to forced labor, child labor, human trafficking, or discriminatory practices, including against employees, contractors, women, children, and indigenous people, we will first engage with the business partner to understand their mitigation or management of these issues before determining the appropriate course of action regarding our business relationship going forward.

Diligence on Forced Labor

As affirmed in our Human Rights Statement, violations of basic human rights in any portion of our business activities value chain is unacceptable. The discovery of forced labor in the global solar supply chain forced us to develop safeguards in our business practices and investments as a means to uphold human rights standards beyond legal compliance.

To ensure, to the best of our organizational ability, that forced labor is not used to support the projects we finance, we review that our clients conduct forced labor diligence on their suppliers. Often through deep engagement with the American Clean Power and Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), our clients work to map their supply chains and verify, to the degree possible, product traceability to ensure that the manufacture of the solar components installed are not products of forced labor. To this end, we require from our clients diligence plans that provide information on their respective supply agreement, audits, and codes of conduct.

Engagement on some combination of the following points informs our own forced labor diligence process:

Traceability protocol: The SEIA Solar Supply Chain Traceability Protocol outlines the traceability requirements that vendors must implement to demonstrate that product being imported into the U.S. is free of forced labor. As signatories to the Protocol, our clients and their module suppliers have attested that their products do not include forced labor, do not include Hoshine Silicon Industry inputs, and do not include inputs from Xinjiang region of China. Additionally, we are signatories to the American Clean Power Forced Labor Prevention Pledge, which reaffirms our commitment to eradicating forced labor from any part of the solar industry value chain.
Third party audits: Our clients generally engage with one or more of the three independent audit firms to support ongoing verification of the attestations made by their suppliers regarding their traceability programs, controls, and the traceability of the products provided to them.
Independent factory audits: Our clients have conducted onsite independent audits of solar module suppliers as part of their ongoing reliability programs. These audits generally review process controls and onsite production. They are designed to ensure compliance with quality control standards, materials specifications, and performance. In addition, many of our clients have added a Certificate of Compliance process requiring their suppliers to update their audit programs and contractual agreements. This also includes requirements for end-to-end material traceability of subcomponents and raw materials incorporated into solar products.
Contractual language: Many of the Master Supply Agreements developed by our clients require that suppliers participate in Vendor Quality Management Programs. Such programs mandate and require independent oversight of supplier production processes, annual or more frequent factory audits, and extensive third-party reliability testing.
Business Partner Code of Conduct: In addition, our clients are subject to our Business Partner Code of Conduct. This document requires that they not use slave labor, forced labor, prison labor, or indentured labor, and requires that they will not support such human rights violations in their supply chains.

Though we acknowledge the inherent limitations in proving a negative (i.e., evidence of absence), we subject every transaction we finance to forced labor diligence. Working with global clients who also care to address this issue has allowed us to supplement our diligence work often with contractual language to create covenants, which advance both parties toward the goal of eliminating forced labor from the global solar supply chain.

To date we have not discovered any indication of forced labor within any portion of our solar supply chain.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  34

BUSINESS PARTNER ESG ENGAGEMENT

Our approach to Business Partner ESG Engagement focuses on identifying the environmental, social and governance issues most important to our stakeholders. Using our materiality assessment as a guide to determine which dimensions of our business partners’ activities to evaluate, we conducted due diligence into the public disclosures associated with a variety of topics, including reputational or legal controversies. This research process contributes in large part to our human rights assessment by proactively screening for any high-profile human rights risks we may inadvertently be exposed to through our business relationships with partner entities.

Scope of Engagement Assessment

In 2022, we conducted due diligence on our top 40 business partners as determined by transaction volume. This number of entities represents 100% of our most material business partners, which surpassed our 50% target threshold for program success. This list includes corporate finance parties, vendors, clients, as well as legal partners. We considered the operational context of our supplier relationships including the history of our business relationship, the progress suppliers have made toward any stated climate-related objectives, including carbon information, how the nature of their respective business sector might influence or constrain their behavior, as well as the regional factors that might inform our respective suppliers’ climate-related postures.

Our Business Partner Engagement Program is an opportunity to proactively engage our value chain on climate-related issues as part of our supplier engagement strategy. While we operate solely in the U.S., and our suppliers and vendors are sometimes found to operate as multinational entities, the impact of conducting such supplier assessment activities is to ensure that our respective climate priorities are aligned.

Engagement Strategy

Once we have selected specific business partners for comprehensive engagement, members of our team will initiate a discussion at least annually with the appropriate business partner personnel. These discussions include:

Sharing organizational ESG values, including our expectation of aligning our practices in accordance with these values;
Sharing best practices and ESG initiatives at our respective organizations; and
Discussing the importance of transparent ESG reporting.

For business partners who share our beliefs and employ leading policies and practices, we will continue discussions on a periodic basis to learn from each other and seek out opportunities to collaborate on various initiatives. For those business partners, including suppliers and vendors, that are determined to have insufficient focus and initiatives to improve upon ESG policies and practices, we request direct discussions with their executive management to provide for the opportunity to align our ESG focus with our continued commercial relationship. In the event we cannot align our ESG focus, we may consider termination of the commercial relationship.

CLIMATE JUSTICE

In early 2022, we adopted an organizational Climate Justice Statement to affirm our commitment to advancing social justice in tandem with our mission of investing in climate solutions, which can be found at www.hasi.com/esg.

CORPORATE POLICY UPDATES

In 2022, we reviewed our corporate ESG-related policies and initiated a review to ensure continued alignment with our organizational values as well emerging ESG best practices. This comprehensive corporate policy review and subsequent update encompassed the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Human Rights and Human Capital Management Policies, Privacy Policy, and Sustainability Investment Policy. Because we recognized the opportunity to enhance specific policies pertinent to Human Rights as well as Human Capital Management, the Company made the decision to bifurcate each into its own respective policy document. Revisions, by policy document include:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Clarified Compliance Procedures regarding Reporting Lines for any conduct or ethics violations.
Underscored our commitment to the continuity of safe business operations with a Health and Safety section.
Added explicit reference to Charitable Contributions alongside our policy regarding Bribes, Gifts & Gratuities.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  35
Human Capital Management Policy

Separated from Human Rights Policies into a standalone policy.
Added commitment to local employment whenever possible, including job candidates limited by background as well as an explicit commitment to providing a living wage (as calculated by the Maryland Department of Labor) for all employees.
Added Occupational Health and Safety section that alludes to internal controls and targets (e.g., goal of zero workplace injuries, etc.).

Human Rights Statement

Separated from Human Capital Management Policy.
Broadened our scope of addressable Human Rights issues.
Outlined our Human Rights Assessment, Mitigation, and Remedy strategy.

OUR PEOPLE

An emphasis on a durable social fabric, including diverse, engaged, and fairly compensated staff, is an important factor in our financial success. Our culture is focused on hiring and retaining highly talented employees with diverse backgrounds and empowering them to create value for our stockholders, and our success is dependent on employee understanding of and investment in their role in that value creation. Our employees are responsible for upholding our purpose, values, strategy, and talent leadership expectations.

ENGAGING WITH OUR TEAM

It is important to us that our employees are engaged in our mission of sustainability because we believe engagement improves their performance, as well as our employee recruitment and retention. Our chief executive officer periodically leads employee meetings intended to reinforce the importance of sustainability and regularly meets with small groups of employees to receive their feedback on our business. We also meet no less than quarterly as a Company to provide information to employees on our mission, strategic planning and financial results. We continuously evaluate our employees’ level of engagement through in-person meetings or remote one-on-one check-in calls that include asking open-ended questions and through formal surveys or similar tools administered on a periodic basis.

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION, JUSTICE AND ANTI-RACISM (DEIJA)

Mission Statement

HASI’s recognition of the importance of diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and anti-racism are essential to the success of our business. Our company is more than just the sum of individual roles, skills, and productivities. We are also a team that values the mutually reinforcing empowerment of people of all races, culture, identities, gender expressions, sexual orientations, and learning and engagement styles. By opening ourselves to the broadest range of talent, we improve both our company performance and our ability to attract and retain talent. We know it is inherently the right way to conduct business.

Strategic Implementation

Our comprehensive, values-driven approach to diversity, inclusion, equity, justice, and anti-racism comprises initiatives that aim beyond legal compliance, to foster an innovative, creative culture where every member of our team can bring their best and most authentic selves to work.

We incorporate our efforts throughout all levels of our organization through:

informing our management training efforts through the work of the DEIJA Working Group to ensure they include, but are not limited to, a focus on multicultural leadership, understanding bias, and anti-racism;
supporting consistent conversations within our team and facilitated by outside experts to better learn from and understand our different respective experiences and perspectives;
actively expanding the sourcing of our candidate pool to increase the breadth of its diversity;
challenging our business partners to share our DEIJA values and practices;
tracking, analyzing, and furthering employee pay equity;
ensuring our philanthropic efforts consider all views on how to address the intersection of climate and equity;
regularly reviewing existing company policies and practices to make updates where and as needed to align our actions with our values; and
consistently engaging on a corporate level in the protection of voting rights to support a vibrant democracy.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  36
Goals and Metrics

We incorporate DEIJA factors into our business operations in part by examining the impact of our climate investments on local, especially disadvantaged, communities. Tracking internal talent metrics including workforce demographics, critical role pipeline and diversity data, and engagement and inclusion indices informs our collective decision making with diverse perspectives. Our Human Resources team manages and reports these metrics to our executive officers and our Board of Directors on at least a quarterly basis.

Because transition planning is a foremost consideration in our recruiting strategy, identifying and developing our next generation of leaders means selectively onboarding the most qualified individuals from the diverse talent pool we actively recruit. We remain devoted to recruiting and promoting highly qualified women, people of color and other underrepresented groups for management and Board positions. Of the new employees we hired in 2022, 36% were women and 67% were people from underrepresented racial, ethnic, and additional minority groups. In 2023, our management team also added two women and one person from an underrepresented group, raising the proportion of diverse representation among this team to 29% and 14%, respectively.

Focusing on diversity is a continuous effort that requires supporting our female and underrepresented employees in their onboarding, training, development, and progression within the Company.

Currently, our Board of Directors is 36% female and 18% racial or ethnic minority. We recognize the need to improve representation across our organization and continue to keep qualified personnel top of mind as our needs mandate.

Workforce Representation

 BOARD OF DIRECTORSLEADERSHIP TEAMMANAGERIAL ROLESWORKFORCE
 12/31/2212/31/2112/31/2212/31/2112/31/2212/31/2112/31/2212/31/21
Female33%33%29%17%40%37%36%37%
Racial or Ethnic Minority22%11%14%0%30%25%33%29%
LGBTQ+0%0%0%0%3%3%3%3%
Employees with Disabilities10%0%0%0%0%0%2%2%
(1)Self-reported

2022 Workforce Age

AGE20222021
18-242%4%
25-3433%32%
35-4439%42%
45-5416%12%
55-647%7%
65+3%3%

93%retention of our women employees in 2022

New Hires

 20222021
Female36%29%
Racial or Ethnic Minority38%
Black/African American18%23%
Asian14%9%
Hispanic/Latino25%3%
Multiracial3%
LGBTQ+10%3%

2022 Promotion Rates

AGE20222021
18-240%
25-3463%37%
35-4429%26%
45-548%26%
55-648%11%
65+0%

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  37

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

To foster a collective sense of ownership commensurate with the work each of our employees contribute to our success, 100% of full-time employees are eligible for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) participation within their first year.

 112 100 % 4 years
Full-time
employees
Employees eligible for
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Average
employee tenure

HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

Because our people represent the long-term health of our business, we endeavor to support the health and wellbeing of our full-time employees and their families with total rewards that address the varied needs of our growing workforce. Our organizational mission drives our attraction and recruitment of top talent who share our long-term vision. Opportunities for meaningful career growth in line with our mission are vital to support and advance the interests of all stakeholders in our organization.

Our fair remuneration policies ensure that our team members are well compensated. We also reward elite performance in multiple ways. Beyond the competitive base salaries and cash bonuses we offer, employees also generally receive a portion of their compensation in the form of equity grants tied to performance. Each employee who remains with the company for at least one year becomes a shareholder whose interest in the prosperity of our organization further distinguishes our compensation packages and employee retention efforts.

For all full-time employees, attractive non-salary benefits supplement the compelling career opportunities we offer. We continuously evaluate the competitiveness of our benefits offerings to meet the varying needs of our employees and their families. Despite a healthcare environment characterized by rising expenses, we continue to pay almost all employee healthcare insurance costs.

Health Plan Highlights and Total Rewards include:

Medical/Prescription Drug Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Group Life/AD&D Insurance
401k Retirement Plan (including match and immediate vesting of individual contributions)
Flexible unlimited vacation
Tuition reimbursement
Employee Assistance program (including mental health, wellness, legal, and financial tools and resources)
Flu shot clinics in-office
Leave policies including 11 paid holidays, maternity and paternity leave, wellness, legal and paid time off (including sick leave)
$0 Employee Contribution to Health Plan

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  38

SKILLS FOR THE FUTURE

Our blended learning approach acknowledges that our people learn from a varied curriculum comprising experiences (at both work and in life), mentors, supportive managers, as well as formal learning and training programs. We understand that learning is highly individualized and strive to provide professional guidance in ways most conducive to the specific needs of individual learners.

Managers hold performance conversations with their employees on a periodic basis (targeting a minimum of twice a year). These conversations ensure that employees receive the level of performance feedback they deserve. Insights gleaned during these performance discussions also enhance our approach to supporting employee development, clarifying expectations that align with the company’s overarching objectives. We also facilitate continuous dialogue between these formal touchpoints.

Our dedication to cultivating our talent and supporting our employees encompasses various professional development opportunities, such as:

Formal educational programs, advanced degrees and professional certifications, including in the fields of accounting and finance; and
Internal trainings on DEIJA, implicit bias, leadership, finance, information technology, strategic thinking, managerial development, and communication skills.
 19 2,071 $2,500
Average number of training
hours per employee
Cumulative number
of training hours
Average number of
training dollars invested
per employee

We have a formal employee mentorship program to encourage learning between all levels of team members and our more senior leaders. This mentorship program functions as support to our formal succession planning procedures, which our Board continually oversees.

We also initiated a project, led by an interdepartmental working group, to assess and initiate the implementation of a new companywide learning platform, with the desired goals of:

1.Increasing the scalability of our training and development opportunities
2.Providing learning pathways for team members working towards lateral or upward advancement in our team
3.Enhancing training delivery for varying learning styles

ENGAGEMENT

Engaged employees actuate our sustainability mission. Our people advance our business, recruit from their networks, and grow their careers with us. We gather the company at least quarterly to inform our entire team about progress on our mission, strategic planning, and financial results. We proactively seek team member input on how we can enhance our work environment and implement feedback on how we can positively influence our local communities. Because our employees embody our organization, our employees are who ultimately uphold our purpose, values, strategy, and talent leadership expectations.

Our employees characterize our company culture as collaborative, rewarding, and transparent. People from all departments connect through:

  
Lunch and LearnsSailing ClubData & Analytics Club
Monthly lunch and learn
discussions about topics relevant
to our business
Our sailing club strengthens our
bonds as a unified crew
Explore a variety of topics covering
coding and scripting, data
modeling, machine learning, artificial
intelligence, automation, and other
emerging trends

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  39

RECRUITMENT AND HIRING

Decisions regarding staffing, selection, and promotions are made on the basis of individual qualifications related to the requirements of the position. We are committed to identifying and developing the talents of our next generation of leaders. We endeavor to select qualified individuals from a diverse pool of candidates derived from broad outreach efforts when we are recruiting. We are committed to the sourcing and/or promotion of highly-qualified women, people of color and other under-represented groups for our board of directors and management positions. To better support our female and underrepresented employees in their onboarding, training, development and progression within the Company, we have established a mentorship program where certain members of our board of directors mentor female employees who are developing managers.

FAIR AND COMPETITIVE COMPENSATION

Our policy is “equal pay for equal work” in compliance with applicable state law. Compensation for our employees is based upon experience, seniority, educational attainment, and individual contribution and company performance against goals.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  40

COMPENSATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

ANNUAL COMPENSATION

We have approved and implemented a compensation program for our independent directors that consists of an annual cash retainer fee and long-term equity awards as described below. We pay directors’ fees only to those directors who are independent under the NYSE listing standards, as more fully described in the section under “Board and Corporate Governance Structure—Our Board of Directors—Director Independence, Executive Sessions and Independent Oversight.”

The components of the independent director compensation for 2022 were as follows:

cash retainer of $100,000 annually per director;
cash retainer to the Lead Independent Director of $25,000 annually;
cash retainer to each of the Chairs of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of $25,000 annually;
cash retainer to each of the Chairs of the NGCR Committee and the Finance and Risk Committee of $15,000 annually; and
equity grant of $120,000 annually per director, which to date has been in the form of LTIP units (as defined below). LTIP units are described in more detail as set forth below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Plan.”

All cash fees described above are paid quarterly in arrears. Our board of directors permitted directors to make an election, on or before December 31, 2021, to receive equity in lieu of all or a portion of their cash compensation for 2022.

A director who is also an employee of the Company is referred to as an executive director. Executive directors do not receive compensation for serving on our board of directors.

OTHER COMPENSATION

We reimburse each of our independent directors for their respective expenses incurred in connection with their respective board responsibilities. Independent directors are not eligible to participate in any of the savings or retirement programs for our employees. Other than as described in this section, there are no separate benefit plans for directors.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Under our stock ownership guidelines, each independent director must hold an ownership stake in the Company of at least five times the annual cash retainer. Each independent director has five years to comply from the later of the date they become covered under this policy or the date the policy was originally adopted. Until the individual is in compliance, independent directors must retain 100% of any equity grants, net of any shares withheld or sold to satisfy taxes. Stock ownership for the purpose of our stock ownership guidelines includes stock, restricted stock, OP units (as defined below) and unvested OP units held by the covered individual but excludes any RSUs (as defined below). As of April 12, 2023, each of our directors, other than Mses. Ardisana, Floyd and Reed and Mr. Armbrister had met the ownership thresholds under the stock ownership guidelines. Each of Mr. Armbrister and Ms. Floyd have until 2026 to meet these thresholds. Ms. Ardisana has until 2027 to meet these thresholds, and Ms. Reed has until 2028 to meet these thresholds.

Our executive chair and our chief executive officer, who also serve as members of our board of directors, are also subject to stock ownership guidelines, which are described in more detail as set forth below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers.”

CHANGES TO OUR DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2023

For 2023, our board of directors approved an increase in the cash retainer to $110,000, the targeted annual equity grant to $145,000 per director, and the cash retainer to the Lead Independent Director to $30,000. Consistent with 2022, our board of directors permitted directors to make an election, on or before December 31, 2022, to receive equity in lieu of all or a portion of their cash compensation for 2023.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEW

The Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendations to our board of directors annually with respect to the compensation of our independent directors. In setting director compensation, our board of directors generally considers the compensation practices and levels for directors paid by our peer group, as well as the expected time commitment from the independent directors in such year.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  41

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2022

Name Fees Paid or
Earned in Cash ($)(1)
 Stock
Awards ($)(2)
 Total ($)
Lizabeth A. Ardisana(3) 30,000 22,968 52,968
Clarence D. Armbrister 100,000 115,062 215,062
Teresa M. Brenner 140,000 115,062 255,062
Michael T. Eckhart 100,000 115,062 215,062
Nancy C. Floyd 100,000 115,062 215,062
Simone Lagomarsino(4) 42,222 0 42,222
Charles M. O’Neil 115,000 115,062 230,062
Richard J. Osborne 125,000 115,062 240,062
Steven G. Osgood  234,962 234,962

(1)Amounts in this column represent annual retainer and committee chair fees paid to independent directors for service in 2022. Mr. Osgood elected to receive all of his fees in stock. All other independent directors elected to receive all of their fees in cash.
(2)In 2022, each of Messrs. Armbrister, Eckhart, O’Neil and Osborne and Mses. Brenner and Floyd were granted 2,497 long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units in Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Partnership, LP, the Company's operating partnership (our “Operating Partnership.”) Mr. Osgood was granted 5,099 LTIP units. The grants were valued at $46.08 per share, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE at the date of grant. Ms. Ardisana was granted 993 LTIP units upon her appointment to the board of directors. The grants were valued at $23.13 per share, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE at the date of grant. The grant date fair value was computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 and the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (Note 2 and Note 11, Equity). The LTIP units granted in 2022 vest on May 15, 2023. As of December 31, 2022, each of Mses. Brenner and Floyd and each of Messrs. Armbrister, Eckhart, O’Neil, and Osborne held 2,497 unvested LTIP units, Ms. Ardisana held 993 unvested LTIP units and Mr. Osgood held 5,099 unvested LTIP units
(3)Prorated based on partial year of service on the board of directors.
(4)Ms. Lagomarsino elected to retire from our board of directors at the end of her term on June 2, 2022.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  42

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Our board of directors is requesting that our stockholders ratify this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

Ernst & Young LLP has audited our or our predecessor’s consolidated financial statements since 1983 and has also provided certain tax and other services to us.

Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that ratification of this appointment of independent registered public accounting firm is not approved at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting virtually via webcast, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 2022 and 2021.

(in thousands) For the Year Ended
December 31, 2022
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2021
 
Audit fees(1) $3,427  $2,296 
Audit-related fees(2)  230   294 
Tax fees(3)  366   417 
TOTAL $4,023  $3,007 

(1)Audit fees include fees and expenses related to the annual audit of the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and our internal controls over financial reporting, the review of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services associated with our public offerings, including review of the registration statement and related issuances of comfort letters and consents and other services related to SEC matters.
(2)Audit-related fees include fees and expenses related to agreed-upon procedures performed on certain of our financing transactions.
(3)Tax fees include fees and expenses related to tax compliance and tax return preparation services, as well as tax planning and advisory services.

The Audit Committee’s charter provides that the Audit Committee shall review and pre-approve the engagement fees and the terms of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by the external auditors and evaluate the effect thereof on the independence of the external auditors. The chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to pre-approve any audit or non-audit service on behalf of the Audit Committee up to an amount of $50,000, with such decisions presented to the full committee at its next meeting.

A majority of all of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions are not votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FORthe ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  43

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has furnished the following report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, our risk management, the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, determine the compensation of, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors.

Management is primarily responsible for our financial reporting process including the system of internal controls and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria established in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee and review the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning compliance with laws, regulations or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as to auditor independence. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP attended the Audit Committee meetings on at least a quarterly basis. These meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP matters that independent accounting firms must discuss with audit committees under generally accepted auditing standards and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audit.

The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from the Company. Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with audit committees concerning independence and represented that it is independent from us. The Audit Committee also received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, audit-related and tax services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in its written charter, the Audit Committee recommended to our board of directors that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 be included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 and is presenting this selection to our stockholders for ratification.

Audit Committee

Steven G. Osgood
Lizabeth A. Ardisana
Nancy C. Floyd
Richard J. Osborne
Kimberly A. Reed

April 19, 2023

The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  44

PROPOSAL NO. 3

STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010 includes a provision, which is further required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, commonly referred to as “Say on Pay,” that entitles our stockholders to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) as disclosed in this proxy statement. At the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.

We believe that our compensation policies and practices are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Stockholders are urged to read the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, and especially the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which discusses our compensation philosophy and how our compensation policies and practices implement our philosophy.

As described more fully in that discussion, our compensation programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:

aligning our management team’s interests with stockholders’ expectations, including our continued investment in solutions that reduce carbon emissions or increase resilience to climate change;
motivating and rewarding our management team to grow our assets and earnings in a manner that is consistent with appropriate risk-taking and based on sound corporate governance practices; and
attracting and retaining an experienced, diverse and effective management team while also maintaining an appropriate expense structure.

One of the guiding principles underlying the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation philosophy is that compensation should encourage and reward strong financial and operational performance. In furtherance of this philosophy, the Compensation Committee structured the 2022 annual incentive plan with quantitative and qualitative performance goals based upon the Company’s strategic goals. The quantitative goals were intended to focus our NEOs on the key financial metrics that impact the Company’s results and stockholder value, including Distributable Earnings (as defined below)(1) and Distributable Return on Equity(2). The qualitative goals included an evaluation of overall performance of each NEO. Set forth below is graphical illustration of our GAAP Earnings per share, GAAP Return on Equity, Distributable Earnings per share and Distributable Return on Equity.

(1)Distributable Earnings per share is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of 2022 Distributable Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 60 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. A reconciliation of 2021 Distributable Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 63 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We refer to this metric as “Distributable Earnings.” In accordance with our investment policy, we will only invest in assets that are negative on incremental carbon emissions or have some other tangible environmental benefit such as reducing water consumption. As a result, our Distributable Earnings and other performance metrics that are based on Distributable Earnings are linked to the positive contributions we make to the environment. We believe that Distributable Earnings has been a meaningful indicator of our economic performance and is useful to our investors as well as management in evaluating our performance as it relates to expected dividend payments over time. Additionally, we believe that our investors also use Distributable Earnings, or a comparable supplemental performance measure, to evaluate and compare our performance to that of our peers, and as such, we believe that the Distributable Earnings metric is useful to our investors.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  45
(2)The decline in GAAP EPS and GAAP ROE in 2022 was largely due to allocations of income in the prior period related to tax credits allocated to our investors which did not recur, as well as our current period allocation of unrealized mark to market losses on economic hedges used by some of our projects. Renewable energy projects often enter into contracts to minimize the impact of increasing power prices. These contracts serve as economic hedges where rising power prices cause the value of these contracts to decrease, which in our case is recognized through the project’s income statement under mark-to-market accounting. As these economic hedges are settled over the life of the contracts, the projects will sell power at the higher market price, offsetting the loss recognized on the hedge.
(3)Distributable Return on Equity is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. It is calculated as annual Distributable Earnings as described above divided by the average of our GAAP stockholders’ equity as of the last day of the four quarters during the year. GAAP stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2022, is located on page 81 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. GAAP stockholders’ equity as of March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2021 are located on page 1 of the respective quarter’s Form 10-Q. We refer to this metric as “Distributable ROE.”

In addition, during 2022, we achieved the following milestones that we believe position us for future success:

Delivered $2.08 Distributable Earnings Per Share on a fully diluted basis in 2022, compared to $1.88 Distributable Earnings Per Share in 2021, representing 11% year-on-year growth. GAAP Earnings Per Share on a fully diluted basis in 2022 was $0.47, and in 2021 was $1.51.
Grew our portfolio 19% in 2022 to $4.3 billion and managed assets 11% to $9.8 billion as of the end of 2022
Reported GAAP-based Net Investment Income of $45 million in 2022, compared to $11 million in 2021
Increased Distributable Net Investment Income in 2022 by 34% year-on-year to $180 million, compared to $134 million in 2021
Closed $1.8 billion of investments in 2022, compared to $1.7 billion in 2021
Reported pipeline of greater than $4.5 billion as of the end of 2022, compared to greater than $4 billion as of the end of 2021
Raised $1.5 billion of capital across diversified funding sources in 2022 and maintained ample liquidity in a volatile market environment
Increased dividend to $0.395 per share for the first quarter of 2023, representing a 5% increase over the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of 2022
Declared Social Dividend of $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2023 to support HASI Foundation climate justice initiatives
Estimated more than 615,000 metric tons of carbon emissions will be avoided annually by our transactions closed in 2022, equating to a CarbonCount® score of 0.35 metric tons per $1,000 invested.

Higher recurring GAAP-based and Distributable net investment income due to significant origination volumes, and continued strength in gain on sale and other fee income contributed to another successful year. The company demonstrated resiliency by further diversifying funding sources, portfolio of investments and maintaining liquidity in a challenging market environment. As result, Distributable Earnings per share and Distributable ROE exceeding our predetermined target which, when taken together, entitled the NEOs to receive 200% of their target corporate performance bonus amounts, which was 90% of NEO incentive compensation. It was also determined, based on Compensation Committee evaluation and input from the CEO, that the NEOs had performed at expected levels on their individual performance measures, which comprised the remaining 10% of such NEO compensation. The calculated corporate performance combined with individual performance resulted in the NEOs receiving an average of 190% of their target incentive compensation, an increase from approximately 180% from 2021.

Overall, we believe these 2022 results provide us a solid foundation to achieve longer-term future success. Our compensation decisions for 2022 have considered the challenges faced and results achieved by our management team in 2022. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation, Discussion and Analysis” for additional details related to our compensation policies and practices and the achievement of our performance goals.

We are requesting your non-binding vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and narrative disclosures.”

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon us or our board of directors. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation programs, values your opinion and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FORapproval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosures in this proxy statement.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  46

INFORMATION REGARDING OUR NAMED EXECUTIVEOFFICERS

Our Named Executive Officers and their ages as of April 9, 202012, 2023 are as follows:

Name Age
Jeffrey W. Eckel 6164
Jeffrey A. Lipson 5255
J. Brendan HerronSusan D. Nickey 5962
Marc T. Pangburn37
Nathaniel J. Rose 42
Steven L. Chuslo62
Daniel K. McMahon4845

Biographical information with respect to Mr.Messrs. Eckel and Lipson is set forth above under “Election of Directors—Information Regarding the Nominees for Election as Directors.”

Jeffrey A. Lipson, 52, joined the Company

Susan D. Nickey, 62, has served as our deputy chief financial officer in January 2019. Effective March 1, 2019, Mr. Lipson became an executive vice president and our chief financial officer. From 2013client officer since January 2021. Ms. Nickey previously served as a managing director from 2014 to 2018, Mr. Lipson was President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Congressional Bancshares and its subsidiary Congressional Bank. He continues to serve2021. Ms. Nickey currently serves as chair-elect on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Congressional Bank. Prior to that, Mr. Lipson was the Senior Vice PresidentAmerican Clean Power Association and Treasureralso serves on the board of CapitalSource Inc.directors of the American Council of Renewable Energy. Additionally, Ms. Nickey is a member of the President’s Council at Ceres, a non-profit sustainability advocacy organization. Previously, she founded and its subsidiary CapitalSource Bank and Senior Vice President, Corporate Treasury, at Bankserved as CEO of America and its predecessor FleetBoston Financial. Mr. LipsonThreshold Power. Ms. Nickey received a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Pennsylvania State University in 1989 and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Notre Dame in Finance1983 and a Master’s of Science in Foreign Service from New York University’s Leonard N. Stern School of BusinessGeorgetown University in 1993. Mr. Lipson serves on the Board of Directors of the Jewish Council1986.

Marc T. Pangburn, 37, has served as executive vice president and chief financial officer since March 2023. As CFO, he is responsible for the Aging of Greater Washington.

J. Brendan Herron, 59, hasall financial functions, including accounting, treasury, capital markets, and investor relations. From 2021 to 2023, he served as an executive vice president since 2013 and served in a variety of roles at the predecessor of our company and its affiliates from 1994 to 2005, and from 2011 to 2013. Mr. Herron served as our chief financial officer from 2013 to 2019. Effective March 1, 2019, Mr. Herron took onco-chief investment officer. Before that, he was a leadership role as an executive vice president focused onmanaging director responsible for the company’s strategystructured investments in both the Grid-Connected and growth initiatives.Behind-the-Meter renewable energy markets. Prior to joining HASI, Mr. Herron has over 25 years of experiencePangburn worked at MP2 Capital, a solar development and financing company, where he was responsible for structuring the firm’s transactions. Previously, Mr. Pangburn worked in structuring, executingthe private capital group at New York Life Investments, focusing on utilities, energy and operating infrastructure debt, and technologyequity investments. He formerly served on the U.S. Commerce Secretary’s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee andMr. Pangburn is presently a member of the BoardPresident’s Council at Ceres, and an advisor to the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center as part of Trustees of Calvert Hall College High School (Baltimore, MD). Mr. Herronthe Corporate Leaders Program. He received ahis Bachelor of ScienceArts degree in accounting and computer scienceeconomics from Loyola University Maryland in 1982 and a Master of Business Administration degree from Loyola University Maryland in 1987 and has passed the CPA and CMA examinations.
Drew University.

Nathaniel J. Rose,, CFA, 42,45, has been anserved as executive vice president since 2015 and our chiefa co-chief investment officer since 2017. Hebeginning in 2021. Previously, Mr. Rose served as our chief operating officer from 2015 to 2017, our chief investment officer from 2013 to 2015 and 2017 to 2020 and has been with the Company and its predecessor since 2000. HeMr. Rose has been involved with a vast majority of our transactions since 2000. HeMr. Rose earned a joint Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Richmond in 2000, a Master of Business Administration degree from the Darden School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia in 2009, is a CFA charter holder and has passed the CPA examination. He holds a Series 63 and 79 securities licenses.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  47
Steven L. Chuslo, 62, has served as an executive vice president and our general counsel since 2013 and with the predecessor of our company as general counsel since 2008. Mr. Chuslo is responsible for internal governance matters and is actively involved in structuring, developing, negotiating and closing transactions. He has more than 30 years of experience in the fields of securities, commercial finance and energy development, U.S. federal regulation and project finance. Mr. Chuslo received a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from the University of Massachusetts/Amherst in 1982 and a Juris Doctorate from the Georgetown University Law Center in 1990.
Back to Contents
Daniel K. McMahon, CFA, 48, has served us as an executive vice president since 2015 and is the head of our portfolio management group. He has been with the Company and its predecessor since 2000 in a variety of roles, including as a senior vice president from 2007 to 2015. He has played a role in analyzing, negotiating, structuring, and managing several billion dollars of transactions. Mr. McMahon received his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California, San Diego in 1993, and is a CFA charter holder. He holds Series 24, 63 and 79 securities licenses.


EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A&A”) describes the executive compensation program that was in place for 20192022 for our chief“chief executive officerofficer” or “CEO,or "CEO," our "CFO"“CFO,” and our next fourthree most highly compensated executive officers. We refer to these individuals as our Named“Named Executive Officers,” or NEOs.“NEOs.

For 2022, our CEO was Jeffrey W. Eckel and our CFO was Jeffrey A. Lipson. As of March 1, 2023, Mr. Eckel transitioned to the role of Executive Chair, Mr. Lipson became our CEO and president and Marc T. Pangburn became our CFO. Unless otherwise noted, the information contained in this CD&A does not reflect the changes in compensation relating to their new roles as of March 1, 2023.

This CD&A explains the overall objectives, elements and policies underlying our NEO compensation program for 2019.2022. In general, our 20192022 compensation consisted of a base salary, an annual bonus paid in cash and stock based on our 20192022 performance and the 20192022 long-term equity incentive program. We also provide some forward-looking detail in regard to each NEO's 2020about our current NEOs’ 2023 base salarysalaries that was adjusted to be effective April 20202023 and annual bonus to be paid in cash and stock (if earned) based on our 20202023 performance. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs.

The CD&A also details the annual equity bonus awarded in 2019 for 2018 performance.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We provide this detail in compliance with the SEC Summary Compensation Table reporting rules, which require that all equity award values granted in the fiscal year of 2019 be disclosed, despite the fact that these particular equity awards were made in connection with 2018 performance.

Executive Summary
We make investmentsinvest in climate change solutions developed or sponsored by providing capital to leading companies in the energy efficiency, renewable energy and other sustainable infrastructure markets. We believe that we are one of the first U.S. public companies solely dedicated to climate changesolution investments. Our goal is to generate attractive returns from a diversified portfolio of projectsproject company investments with long-term, predictable cash flows from proven technologies that reduce carbon emissions or increase resilience to climate change.
Our vision is that every investment improves our climate future.

We are internally managed, and our management team has extensive relevant industry knowledge and experience, dating back more than 30 years.experience. We have long-standing relationships with the leading energy service companies, (“ESCOs”), manufacturers, project developers, utilities, owners and operators. Our origination strategy is to use these relationships to generateoperators, which provide recurring, programmatic investment and fee generatingfee-generating opportunities. Additionally, we have relationships with leading banks,commercial and investment banks and institutional investors from which we are referred additional investment and fee generatingfee-generating opportunities.


Executive Compensation Program Objectives

The Compensation Committee of our board of directors is responsible for establishing and administering policy with respectour policies that relate to the compensation of our NEOs on an annual basis.NEOs. We are committed to providing an executive compensation program that supports the following goals and philosophies:

aligning our management team’s interests with those of our stockholders, including our continued investment in solutions that reduce carbon emissions and increase resilience to climate change;
motivating and rewarding our management team for executing our operational plans with a focus on sustainable long-term growth in a manner that is consistent with appropriate risk-taking based on sound corporate governance practices; and
attracting and retaining an experienced and effective management team while also maintaining an appropriate expense structure.

aligning our management team’s interests with those of our stockholders, including our continued investment in solutions that reduce carbon emissions and increase resilience to climate change;
motivating and rewarding our management team for executing our operational plans with a focus on sustainable long-term growth in a manner that is consistent with appropriate risk-taking based on sound corporate governance practices; and
attracting and retaining an experienced and effective management team while also maintaining an appropriate expense structure.

Structure of Our Executive Compensation Program

As discussed in more detail herein,in this CD&A, our executive compensation program is comprised of the following primary compensation elements:

base salary, which is an element of compensation set at levels that are commensurate with our NEOs’ positions and provide fixed pay to attract and retain our NEOs, taking into account our budgeted operating expenses;
incentive compensation (annual bonus) that is payable in cash or equity that vests over time; and
long-term equity incentive program comprised of awards subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting that are designed to meet both our long-term growth and retention objectives.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  48
base salary, which is an element of compensation set at levels that are commensurate with our NEOs positions and provide fixed pay to attract and retain our NEOs, taking into account our budgeted operating expenses;
Back to Contents
incentive compensation (annual bonus) that is payable in cash or equity that vests

For 2022, over a period of time from date of grant and is based on achievement of certain quantitative and qualitative corporate and individual performance objectives; and

long-term equity incentive program comprised of awards subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting that are designed to meet both our long-term growth and retention objectives.


For 2019, over 70%75% of our targeted executive compensation was variable or equity-based (as opposed to a fixed cash amount) as shown below:

  Percentage of 20192022 Targeted Compensation
Compensation ElementType of CompensationMr. Eckel
Other Named

Executive Officers
Annual base salaryFixed13%19%12%17% to 30%21%
Annual cash or equity incentiveVariable / Equity-based24%23%20%26% to 37%29%
Long-term equity incentive programVariable / Equity-based63%33%68%51% to 58%57%
Our

The Compensation Committee believes having a significant portion of variable or equity-based compensation achieves our goals of encouraging high performance, promoting accountability, retaining skilled and diverse leadership and motivating our executives to achieve our business objectives and aligning their interests with those of our stockholders.

Overview of 20192022 Performance and our Pay for Performance Philosophy

One of the guiding principles underlying the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation philosophy is that compensation should encourage and reward strong financial and operational performance. Our executive compensation philosophy is also implicitly linked to ESG performance, as our financial performance is driven in large part from investments that address climate change.change – either through quantified projected reductions in carbon emissions or other environmental benefits. In furtherance of this philosophy, the Compensation Committee established the 20192022 annual incentive plan with quantitative and qualitative performance goals based upon the Company’s strategic goals. The quantitative goals were intended to focus our NEOs on the key financial metrics that impact the Company’s results and stockholder value, including CoreDistributable Earnings per share and CoreDistributable ROE. The qualitative goals included an evaluation of overall performance of each NEO.

(1)Distributable Earnings per share is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of 2022 Distributable Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 60 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. A reconciliation of 2021 Distributable Earnings to GAAP net income is located on page 63 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We refer to this metric as “Distributable Earnings.” In accordance with our investment policy, we will only invest in assets that are negative on incremental carbon emissions or have some other tangible environmental benefit such as reducing water consumption. As a result, our Distributable Earnings and other performance metrics that are based on Distributable Earnings are linked to the positive contributions we make to the environment. We believe that Distributable Earnings has been a meaningful indicator of our economic performance and is useful to our investors as well as management in evaluating our performance as it relates to expected dividend payments over time. Additionally, we believe that our investors also use Distributable Earnings, or a comparable supplemental performance measure, to evaluate and compare our performance to that of our peers, and as such, we believe that the Distributable Earnings metric is useful to our investors.
(2)The decline in GAAP EPS and GAAP ROE in 2022 was largely due to allocations of income in the prior period related to tax credits allocated to our investors which did not recur, as well as our current period allocation of unrealized mark to market losses on economic hedges used by some of our projects. Renewable energy projects often enter into contracts to minimize the impact of increasing power prices. These contracts serve as economic hedges where rising power prices cause the value of these contracts to decrease, which in our case is recognized through the project’s income statement under mark-to-market accounting. As these economic hedges are settled over the life of the contracts, the projects will sell power at the higher market price, offsetting the loss recognized on the hedge.
(3)Distributable Return on Equity is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. It is calculated as annual Distributable Earnings as described above divided by the average of our GAAP stockholders’ equity as of the last day of the four quarters during the year. GAAP stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2022, is located on page 81 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. GAAP stockholders’ equity as of March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2021 are located on page 1 of the respective quarter’s Form 10-Q. We refer to this metric as “Distributable ROE.”

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  49

Higher Core Net Investment Income coupled with strongrecurring GAAP-based and Distributable net investment income, which came from significant origination volumes, a continued reduction to our financing costs, and continued strength in gain on sale and other fee income contributed to a financially successful year. The increase in Core Net Investment Income was a result of strong origination volumes, a higher yielding balance sheet and a reduction in our financing costs due to lower cost and outstanding balance of debt.year for us. This resulted in CoreDistributable Earnings per share meeting our predetermined target and CoreDistributable ROE exceeding our predetermined targettargets which, when taken together, entitled the NEOs to receive 111%200% of their target corporate performance bonus amounts, which was 70%80% of NEO incentive compensation. The remaining 30%It was also determined, based on anCompensation Committee evaluation and input from the CEO, that the NEOs had performed at or above expected levels on their individual performance measures, which comprised the remaining 20% of individual performance.such NEO compensation. The calculated corporate performance combined with individual performance resulted in the NEOs receiving an average of 106%190% of their target incentive compensation, a decreasean increase from approximately 135% for 2018.

180% from 2021.

Our 20192022 results would not have been achieved without the leadership and efforts of the NEOs, and the results had a direct impact on the compensation decisions. In makingWhen it made its decisions about compensation decisions to be paid in 2020,2023 for 2022 performance, the Compensation Committee recognized the 20192022 results and achievements noted above, the performance of the Company and the NEOs, the performance of the Company as compared to other companies in our peer group (as defined below) and the contributions and accomplishments of our NEOs to our continuing growth.

Our Executive Compensation Program Best Practices

OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM BEST PRACTICES

Our executive compensation program incorporates the following best practices:

Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors.
Independent compensation consultants that are engaged directly by the Compensation Committee and provide no other services to management or the Company.


Compensation structure with targeted compensation that is predominately variable based on performance and equity-based.
Compensation Committee reviewed and considered total compensation for each NEO against a peer group (as defined below).
Robust stock ownership guidelines.
Recoupment policy for performance or incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.
Limited executive perquisites.
Hedging, pledging and margin accounts related to our Common Stock not permitted by any of our NEOs.
Equity incentive plan that prohibits repricing of stock options without prior stockholder approval.
Equity incentive plan provides that equity awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of no less than one year.
Process for Setting Executive Compensation

All Compensation Committee members are independent directors.
Our independent compensation consultants are engaged directly by the Compensation Committee and provide no other services to management or the Company.
Compensation structure with targeted compensation that is predominately variable based on performance and equity-based.
Compensation Committee reviews and considers total compensation for each NEO against a peer group (as defined below).
Robust stock ownership guidelines.
Clawback policy for the recoupment of performance or incentive-based compensation if an accounting restatement is needed because of material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.
Limited executive perquisites.
Hedging, pledging and margin accounts related to our Common Stock not permitted.
Equity incentive plan that prohibits repricing of stock options without prior stockholder approval.
Equity incentive plan provides that equity awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of no less than one year.

PROCESS FOR SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for setting and approving the compensation of our chief executive officer and, upon the recommendation of our chief executive officer, reviewing approving and recommending to our board of directors,approving compensation for our other NEOs in a manner that is effective and consistent with our overall executive compensation strategy. As part of that responsibility, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each of our NEOs on an individual basis the performance of our NEOs.basis. As part of its process for reviewing the performance of our NEOs for 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee considered the recommendations of our chief executive officer with respectrelating to the compensation of our NEOs.

The Compensation Committee typically reviews compensation levels for our NEOs near the beginning of each calendar year inwhen determining base salaries and budgeted amounts for total compensation for the new fiscal year, and then meets again following the end of such fiscal year to review the Company’s and the NEOs’ actual performance, at which time it makes determinations with respect to adjustments to base salary, annual cash and equity bonuses and our long-term equity incentive program. The Compensation Committee also meets periodically during the fiscal year to review the Company’s performance and other compensation matters, such as quarterly bonus accruals. As part of its annual review of the compensation paid to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee typically considers a number of factors in determining or structuring compensation, including the nature of the executive’s job and the responsibilities related thereto, the executive’s job performance compared to goals and objectives established for the Company and the executive at the beginning of the year, the experience level of the executive in his or her current position, the compensation levels of competitive jobs within our peer group (as defined below), our financial performance and financial condition, the execution of our investment and financing strategy, the impact of compensation determinations on our budgeted operating expense ratios and certain other quantitative and qualitative factors. These factors described

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  50

above may vary from year to year in importance to, and usage by, the Compensation Committee, depending upon market conditions, corporate priorities and individual circumstances.

From 20162018, the Compensation Committee also engaged Pay Governance, a compensation consulting firm, to report to the Compensation Committee on the setting of certain annual bonus targets for our NEOs. In July 2019, the Compensation Committee engaged FTIPay Governance to provide advice regarding the executive compensation program for our senior management team and board of directors, including analysis and recommendations regarding (1) base salaries, annual bonuses, including the mix of cash and equity, and long-term incentive compensation for our executive management team, (2) the director compensation program for independent members of our board of directors, and (3) other matters as requested by the Compensation Committee. From 2018,Pay Governance was also engaged by the Compensation Committee also engaged Pay Governance,in March 2021 to ascertain the benefits of adopting a compensation consulting firm,DEIJA policy as well as proposing various performance standards related to reportsuch policy as it relates to the Compensation Committee oncomposition of the settingmembers of certainboard of directors and leadership team against which annual bonus targets forCEO and the other NEOs’ compensation would be evaluated by our NEOs. In July 2019, the Compensation Committee replaced FTI with Pay Governance as its primary compensation consultant. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee and they have not performed, and do not currently provide, any other services to management or the Company.

board of directors.

As part of the annual review of compensation payable to each of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee typically considers the compensation practices and levels at other companies that it deems generally comparable in structure and strategy. For 2019,2022, this consideration was based on ana July 2018 FTI2021 Pay Governance peer group development report that includesincluded other internally managed mortgage REITs or specialty-finance or renewable energy companies with market capitalizations ranging from approximately $0.6 billion to $2.3$19.4 billion as compared to our market capitalization at the same time of approximately $1.1$4.4 billion. We sometimes refer to this group as our “peer group” for purposes of determining compensation. Based on an October 2019 Pay Governance report, no changes were made to the peer group for 2020.




Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.Pattern EnergyMain Street Capital Corporation
Capstead Mortgage CorporationNew York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
CoreSite Realty CorporationPlug Power Inc.
First Solar, Inc.Redwood Trust, Inc.
Hercules Capital, Inc.SunPower Corporation
Iron Mountain, IncorporatedSunrun Inc.
iStar Inc.TPI Composites, Inc.
Ladder Capital Corp.Uniti Group Inc.
 
Capstead Mortgage CorporationRedwood Trust, Inc.
Hercules Capital, Inc.SunPower Corporation
HFF, Inc.Sunrun Inc.
iStar Inc.TPI Composites, Inc.
Ladder Capital Corp.Vivint Solar, Inc.
Main Street Capital CorporationWalker & Dunlop, Inc.
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. 

The Compensation Committee works jointly with management and the compensation consultant to design and implement oura compensation plan that combines the elements of current cash compensation in the form of a base salary, an annual bonus (payable in cash and equity) and long-term equity incentive compensation in one plan, which we refer to as the executive compensation program, the components of which are described below. The Compensation Committee and our board of directors approved the program on an annual basis for the purpose of (i) attracting and retaining top performing employees, (ii) motivating employees by tying compensation directly to our financial performance, and (iii) rewarding exceptional individual performance that supports our overall objectives. The Compensation Committee believes that by issuing both cash and equity incentive awards, based on an individual’s achievement of the performance criteria, the executive compensation program allows us to more closely match the incentives of our NEOs with both the long and short-term goals of the business while also improving our ability to monitor the results of our compensation program.

The Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to our board of directors annually with respect to the compensation of our independent directors. In setting director compensation, our board of directors generally considers the compensation practices and levels for directors paid by our peer group, as well as the expected time commitment from the independent directors in such year.

Scope of Authority of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving, evaluating and, in some cases, recommending to our board of directors, on an annual basis, director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company, including determining salaries, annual cash bonuses, equity awards, change in control and termination arrangements and director fees. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, terminate and pay any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of director and senior executive compensation, as well as the authority to retain special legal, accounting or other consultants to advise the committeeCompensation Committee and may form subcommittees and delegate its authority to such subcommittees. No subcommittees were formed by the Compensation Committee in 2019.2022.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  51
Executive Compensation Program Components
Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM COMPONENTS

The following provides an overview of our approach to each primary element of our NEO compensation program and an analysis of the compensation paid under each of these elements. Equity incentives arehave been granted under the 2013 Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the Equity Incentive Plan“2013 Plan”).



, and the 2022 Plan.

Compensation ElementObjectiveKey Features
Base Salary (Cash)•  Provides a fixed element of compensation commensurate with each NEOs position and responsibility.•  Adjustments are generally considered annually based on individual performance, level of pay relative to the market and our peer group, internal pay equity, and retention issues.retention.
Annual Incentive Compensation (Cash and Equity)•  Provides an annual incentive or bonus based upon our overall corporate and individual performance as well as objective and subjective performance criteria that are aligned with the strategic direction of the Company.

•  Compensation Committee approves the overall corporate and individual performance measures as well as objective and subjective performance criteria on an annual basis.

•  Compensation Committee determines allocation between cash and equity on an annual basis, as well as the vesting criteria of the annual equity awards.

Long-term Incentive Program (Equity) 
Long-term incentive program (Equity)•  Provides equity-based incentives that contain multi- year vesting and/or performance criteria in order to further our retention objectives and align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders over a longer time period.

•  Compensation Committee determines allocation between time-based and performance-based awards.

•  Compensation Committee determines the performance targets and vesting criteria.

Health Welfare, and Other Benefits•  Offers all eligible employees a competitive benefits package, which includes health and welfare benefits, such as 401(k), medical, dental, disability insurance, and life insurance benefits.•  The plans under which these benefits are offered do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of officers and are available to all eligible employees.
Perquisites and Other Benefits•  Other than key man life insurance and disability benefits provided to Mr. Eckel as described below and, beginning in 2023, Mr. Lipson, we do not provide any perquisites and do not intend to provide perquisites exceeding $15,000 in the aggregate to our NEOs because we believe that we can provide better incentives for desired performance with compensation in the forms described above.•  N/A

In terms of compensation paid to our NEOs, we have generally provided annual base salaries and target annual bonusesbonus opportunities within a competitive range of the median of the peer group with a higher level of long-term incentive equity compensation. We do not, however, have a policy of targeting compensation for our NEOs to any specific level within the range of total compensation paid by our peer group (i.e., median, upper or lower); rather, we have attempted to structure our executive compensation program and to compensate our NEOs in a manner that is both competitive enough to retain their services and rewards their performance, hard work and dedication, but is also consistent with our needs to maintain an appropriate expense structure.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  52


Base Salary

Base salary, which represents the fixed element of our executive compensation program, provides for basic economic security at a level that allows us to retain the executive’s services. The Compensation Committee generally establishes annual base salaries for our NEOs commensurate with the level of experience that the executive brings to the position, the nature of the responsibilities required of the executive, such as whether the executive is performing in multiple roles, how successful the executive is in achieving goals established by the Compensation Committee and the executive’s contributions to the Company, but does not assign any specific weights to these factors. As discussed in other parts of this CD&A, the Compensation Committee also considers the size of the Company and our budgeted operating expenses in setting annual base salaries. Base salaries are reviewed and may be adjusted to better match competitive market levels, to ensure executive retention or to recognize an executive’s professional growth and development, increased responsibility or other discretionary factors. The table below reflects the annual salary of our NEOs with increases effective in April of each of the years:

Name 2018 Annual Salary ($) 2019 Annual Salary ($) 2020 Annual Salary ($)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 639,500 639,500 639,500
Jeffrey A. Lipson (1)
 - 350,000 400,000
J. Brendan Herron 380,000 400,000 400,000
Nathaniel J. Rose 363,875 380,000 390,000
Steven L. Chuslo 360,000 360,000 370,000
Daniel K. McMahon 342,000 355,000 365,000
(1) Mr. Lipson joined the Company in 2019 and was appointed chief financial officer and became an NEO on March 1, 2019.     

Name 2021 Annual Salary ($) 2022 Annual Salary ($)   2023 Annual Salary ($)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 825,000 825,000 412,500
Jeffrey A. Lipson 525,000 525,000 775,000
Susan D. Nickey 370,000 400,000 420,000
Marc T. Pangburn 370,000 400,000 425,000
Nathaniel J. Rose 415,000 415,000 420,000

The determination to increase base salaries in 20202023 for certain of our NEOs was driven by the performance of our NEOs and our desire to establish a base salary that is more competitive with comparable basein the market. As of March 1, 2023, Mr. Eckel transitioned to the role of Executive Chair, Mr. Lipson became our chief executive officer and president and Mr. Pangburn became our CFO. As a result, 2023 salaries of our peers.

for Messrs. Eckel, Lipson and Pangburn reflect their new roles.

Annual Incentive Compensation or Bonuses

Annual incentive compensation, in the form of cash incentive compensation and equity incentive awards subject to time-based vesting conditions, is available to each of the NEOs under our executive compensation program, with the Compensation Committee determining the allocation between cash and equity. Incentive compensation serves as a means of linking annual compensation both to our overall performance and to objective and subjective performance criteria that are aligned with the Company’s strategic direction.

We provided our NEOs with the opportunity to earn annual incentive compensation for achieving corporate financial and non-financial goals for performance in 20182021 and 2019.2022. These bonus awards, which provide for no minimum award or guaranteed payment, are comprised of two parts: a quantitative component and a qualitative component.

The following chart summarizes the target bonus percentage and actual awarded bonus percentages for 20182021 and 20192022 calculated as a percentage of the base salary at the end of the respective year.

Name 2018 Target Bonus (%) 2019 Target Bonus (%) 2018 Actual Bonus (%) 2019 Actual Bonus (%)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 175 175 222 186
Jeffrey A. Lipson (1)
 - 125 - 135
J. Brendan Herron 125 125 219 133
Nathaniel J. Rose 150 150 184 158
Steven L. Chuslo 125 125 164 133
Daniel K. McMahon 125 125 164 130
(1) Mr. Lipson joined the Company in 2019 and was appointed chief financial officer and became an NEO on March 1, 2019.     

Name 2021 Target Bonus (%)   2022 Target Bonus (%) 2021 Actual Bonus (%)   2022 Actual Bonus (%)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 175 175 315 333
Jeffrey A. Lipson 150 150 270 285
Susan D. Nickey 125 125 225 239
Marc T. Pangburn 125 125 225 239
Nathaniel J. Rose 150 150 270 285

The target bonus percentagespercentage for 2020 areMr. Rose for 2023 is unchanged from 2019.2022. For 2023, the target bonus (%) for Mr. Eckel is 237%, Mr. Lipson is 175%, Ms. Nickey is 140% and Mr. Pangburn is 150%.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  53

2018
2022 Bonus Awards awarded in 2019
2023

For 2018,2022, our NEOsNEO incentive compensation was weighted such that 70%90% was based on quantitative corporate performance measures and 30%10% was based on an evaluation of individual performance. The following table sets forth the quantitative corporate performance measure hurdles and corresponding incentive compensation payouts for each of the NEOs under the quantitative component of the incentive plan:

Corporate Performance Objectives 
Weighting 
 
Quantitative Company
Performance Hurdle
(1)
 
Payout as a % of Target Upon Achievement of Hurdle (1)
 
Actual
Performance
 
2018 Core Earnings / share 75% $1.22 - $1.32 50%  
    $1.32 100% $1.38
    $1.32 – $1.39 150%  
         
2018 Core ROE 25% 9.0% - 10.0% 50%  
    10.0% 100% 11.1%
    10.0% - 10.5% 150%  

Corporate Performance Objectives Weighting Quantitative Company
Performance Hurdle(1)
 Payout as a % of Target
Upon Achievement of
Hurdle(1)
 Actual
Performance
2022 Distributable Earnings / share 75% $1.88 - $1.98 50%  
    $1.98 100% $2.08
    $1.98 - $2.07 200%  
         
2022 Distributable ROE 25% 9.25% – 10.0% 50%  
    10.0% 100% 11.4%
    10.0% – 10.75% 200%  
(1)
(1)Actual results were interpolated between these values.

The calculated achievement of corporate goals was approximately 145%200%, which, when combined with qualitative measures, resulted in our NEOs receiving an average of 135%190% of their targeted bonus. In accordance with the 20182022 Bonus Awards, our NEOs received the following amounts of total incentive compensation for 20182022 that was paid or granted in 2019:

Name 
 Total Incentive Compensation Earned in 2018 ($) 
% of
Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Cash
 
 
% of Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Restricted
 
Stock (1)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 1,421,289 100 
Jeffrey A. Lipson (2)
   
J. Brendan Herron 830,440 75 25
Nathaniel J. Rose 669,985 100 
Steven L. Chuslo 589,500 100 
Daniel K. McMahon 561,094 100 

(1)Each NEO was awarded a dollar value bonus based on the achievement of corporate goals and qualitative measures as described above, which was then allocated between cash and equity using the percentages in this chart. The number of shares of restricted Common Stock awarded to each NEO was determined by dividing the equity portion of the awarded bonus by $24.01, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on January 2, 2018. The shares of restricted Common Stock are issued from our Equity Incentive Plan and are valued at $24.94 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant, and vest in May 2020.

(2)Mr. Lipson joined the Company in 2019 and was appointed chief financial officer and became an NEO on March 1, 2019.     













20192023:

Name Total Incentive
Compensation Earned in
2022 ($)
 % of
Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Cash
 % of Incentive
Compensation Paid
in LTIP Units or
Restricted Stock
Jeffrey W. Eckel 2,743,125 100 
Jeffrey A. Lipson 1,496,250 100 
Susan D. Nickey 957,500 100 
Marc T. Pangburn 957,500 100 
Nathaniel J. Rose 1,182,750 100 

2021 Bonus Awards awarded in 2020
2022

For 2019,2021, our NEO incentive compensation was weighted such that 70%80% was based on quantitative corporate performance measures and 30%20% was based on an evaluation of individual performance. The following table sets forth the quantitative corporate performance measure hurdles and corresponding incentive compensation payouts for each of the NEOs under the quantitative component of the incentive plan:

Corporate Performance Objectives 
Weighting 
 
Quantitative Company
Performance Hurdle
(1)
 
Payout as a % of Target Upon Achievement of Hurdle (1)
 
Actual
Performance
 
2019 Core Earnings / share 75% $1.30 - $1.40 50%  
    $1.40 100% $1.40
    $1.40 - $1.47 150%  
         
2019 Core ROE 
 25% 9.0% - 10.0% 50%  
    10.0% 100% 10.5%
    10.0%-10.5% 150%  
         

Corporate Performance Objectives Weighting Quantitative Company
Performance Hurdle(1)
 Payout as a % of Target
Upon Achievement of
Hurdle(1)
 Actual
Performance
2021 Distributable Earnings / share 75% $1.59 – $1.72 50%  
    $1.72 100% $1.88
    $1.72 – $1.85 200%  
         
2021 Distributable ROE 25% 9.25% – 10.0% 50%  
    10.0% 100% 11.2%
    10.0% – 10.75% 200%  
(1)
(1)Actual results were interpolated between these values.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  54

The calculated achievement of corporate goals was approximately 111%,200% which, when combined with qualitative measures, resulted in our NEOs receiving an average of 106%180% of their targeted bonus. In accordance with the 20192020 Bonus Awards, our NEOs received the following amounts of total incentive compensation for 20192020 that was paid or granted in 2020:

Name 
 Total Incentive Compensation Earned in 2019 ($) 
% of
Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Cash
 
 
% of Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Restricted
 
Stock (1)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 1,528,281 50 50
Jeffrey A. Lipson 604,835 50 50
J. Brendan Herron 681,613 50 50
Nathaniel J. Rose 771,913 50 50
Steven L. Chuslo 614,892 50 50
Daniel K. McMahon 594,233 50 50
(1)Each NEO was awarded a dollar value bonus based on the achievement of corporate goals and qualitative measures as described above, which was then allocated between cash and equity using the percentages in this chart. The number of shares of restricted Common Stock awarded to each NEO was determined by dividing the equity portion of the awarded bonus by $19.78, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on January 2, 2019. The shares of restricted Common Stock are issued from our Equity Incentive Plan and are valued at $31.00 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant, and vest in May 2021.

2021:

Name Total Incentive
Compensation Earned in
2021 ($)
 % of
Incentive
Compensation
Paid in Cash
 % of Incentive
Compensation
Paid in LTIP Units or
Restricted
Stock (1)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 2,598,750 100 
Jeffrey A. Lipson 1,417,500 100 
Susan D. Nickey 832,500 100 
Marc T. Pangburn 832,500 100 
Nathaniel J. Rose 1,120,500 100 

Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019
2022

NEOs are eligible to participate in a long-term equity incentive program that was based upon (i)(i) our desire to increase the executive’s ownership stake in the Company and better align the executive’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders, (ii) our desire to tie total incentive compensation (including equity incentive awards) to specified quantitative performance measures, (iii) our desire to increase the amount of non-cash, equity incentive compensation earned by our NEOs as a percentage of their total compensation, and (iv) our desire to provide our NEOs with a competitive balance of current cash compensation and equity compensation subject to time-based and performance- based vesting conditions that increases the executive’s incentive to remain with the Company over the longer-term.

To address the goal of aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee allocated 50% of the award to each of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs in the form of either restricted stock units ("RSUs"(“RSUs”) or, at the election of our NEOs, performance-based LTIP units which,that, upon conversion, may becomeRestricted Limited Partnership Units (“OP units”). RSUs and performance-based LTIP Units”) that vest only upon achievement of specified performance metrics. These performance awards subject our Named Executive OfficersNEOs to the downside risk of a decrease in the value of their compensation if the returns to our stockholders do not match the returns of the index against which our returns are being measured ("(“Relative TSR"TSR”) or we do not achieve a specified total stockholder return ("(“Absolute TSR"TSR”). In addition, LTIP units are a special kind of partnership interest that have no value if there is not a positive partnership revaluation event, as defined by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Both Absolute and Relative TSR goals are measured on an approximate three-year basis or such shorter period upon the occurrence of a



change of control. The number of performance awards that may be earned range from 50% of target for threshold performance achievement, and 200% of target for outperformance achievement. Under the Relative TSR component, target units are earned only if our total stockholder return is equal to or above the 55thpercentile of the index. Further, the total units earned will not exceed 100% of the target if the Absolute TSR is below zero.

We believe that growth in stockholder return is important to investors and is an appropriate measure of our long-term success. The use of stockholder return was based upon an analysis of the measures used by the other companies in our peer group. The Compensation Committee allocated the remaining portion of the annual award in the form of time-vested restricted Common Stock or, at the election of the officer, time-restricted LTIP units. This allocation satisfies the need for a useful retention tool, given that in our market there is a demand for experienced executive talent. The service-based award furthers our goal of aligning the long-term interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders as it subjects our NEOs to the downside risk of a decrease in compensation if the price of our Common Stock declines.

Name 
 
2019 Performance
Based Award LTIP Units
(1)
 
2019 Time Based Award LTIP Units (2)
 
Total Value of 2019 Award ($) (3)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 152,000 76,000 3,991,140
Jeffrey A. Lipson 20,000 10,000 525,150
J. Brendan Herron 63,000 31,500 1,654,223
Nathaniel J. Rose 46,000 23,000 1,207,845
Steven L. Chuslo 40,000 20,000 1,050,300
Daniel K. McMahon 40,000 20,000 1,050,300

Name 2022 Performance
Based Award LTIP
Units(1)
 2022 Time
Based Award LTIP
Units(2)
 Total Value of
2022
Award ($)(3)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 87,864 43,933 4,430,369
Jeffrey A. Lipson 25,752 12,874 1,298,388
Susan D. Nickey 18,500 9,248 932,724
Marc T. Pangburn 18,500 9,248 932,724
Nathaniel J. Rose 25,484 12,742 1,284,967
(1)
(1)
Represents the total amount of LTIP units that have been granted, which reflect maximum performance. 50% of the units are to be earned based on Absolute TSR over a three-year time period and 50% of the units are to be earned based on Relative TSR over the same time period. The actual OP units to be earned under such grants of LTIP units,, which vest based on the achievement of certain targets, are calculated according to the chart below. The total units earned will not exceed 100% of the target if the Absolute TSR is below zero.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  55
Total Stockholder Return Metrics  Threshold
50%
 Target
100%
 Outperform
200% 
Absolute TSR 18.0% 24.0% 30.0%
Relative TSR 30.0% 55.0% 80.0%
Total Stockholder Return Metrics Threshold
50%
 Target
100%
 Outperform
200%
Absolute TSR 18.0% 24.0% 30.0%
Relative TSR 30.0% 55.0% 80.0%
(2)Represents time-based LTIP units that vest in three equal annual amounts on May 15, 2020,2023, and March 5, 20212024 and 2022.
2025.
(3)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of both the time-vested and performance-vested LTIP units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192022 (Note 2 and Note 11, Equity). The time vested grants were valued at $25.82$46.08 per unit, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on April 1, 2019,March 25, 2022, the date of grant. The Absolute TSR units were valued at $11.39$25.88 per unit and the Relative TSR units were valued at $15.31,$28.89 in each case by an independent appraisal.


Benefits

Benefits are also established based upon a determination of what is needed to aid in attracting and retaining executive talent, as well as providing long-term financial security to our employees and their families. The NEOs are eligible to participate in our health, dental and vision plans, and various insurance plans, including disability and life insurance, and in our 401(k) plan.

Severance Benefits Payable Upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control

In order to achieve our compensation objective of attracting, retaining and motivating qualified senior executives, we believe that we need to provide our NEOs with severance protections that are consistent with the severance protections offered by companies similar to us. Consistent with this philosophy, we believe that severance should be payable to our NEOs in the event their employments are terminated under certain circumstances. For more information regarding the terms of the employment agreements, see “—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table.” The employment agreements are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee.



Tax Deductibility

In April 2022, our board of Executive Compensation

directors approved our Retirement Policy with immediate effect. Our Retirement Policy provides for full vesting at retirement of any time-based awards that were granted prior to the date of retirement. Further, the Retirement Policy permits the vesting performance-based awards that were granted prior to the date of retirement according to the original vesting schedule of the award, subject to the achievement of the applicable performance measures. The Retirement Policy applies to employees as of the earlier of the date the applicable employee (1) reaches an age of 65 years or (2) reaches an age of 55 years and has worked at the Company for at least 10 years. Employees who have been actively employed by the Company since before the date of our initial public offering are credited with five years of prior service for purposes of determining their eligibility at retirement. Our Retirement Policy applies to all employees who receive grants of equity awards, whether they are NEOs, executive officers or other employees. The Company reserves the right to waive, amend, terminate or discontinue the policy to the extent our board of directors determines that it is in the Company’s interest.

TAX DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), places a $1,000,000 limit on the amount of compensation that may be deducted annually by the Company on our tax return with respect to eachcertain NEOs, defined as “covered members” under Section 162(m). In December 2020, final regulations around Section 162(m) were published, which pertain in part to up-REIT structures. The final regulations provide that the Company’s distributive share of any compensation deduction for amounts paid to our NEOs. Historically, compensation paid for achieving pre-established and objective performance goals pursuant to a plan that has been approvedNEOs by our stockholders has not been subject to this limit. Although the performance-based exemption under Section 162(m) was repealed for taxable years beginningOperating Partnership after December 31, 2017, performance-based awards that were granted on or before November 2, 2017 or compensation to be paid pursuant to binding written contracts that were in effect on November 2, 2017 will, in many circumstances, remain eligible for the performance-based exemption. Our Equity Incentive Plan is designed so that18, 2020, as well as time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards granted to our NEOs under the plan on or beforeawarded after November 2, 2017, can be exempt fromare subject to the compensationSection 162(m) deduction limitation described above. Going forward, whenlimit. When the Company determines whether to use performance-based awards in its grants to NEOs, it willkeeps in mind that there is generally no longer be taking into account the potential tax deduction with respect to compensation for an NEO in excess of $1,000,000 a year, which will no longer be available, and the Company'sCompany’s performance-based pay practices may change accordingly in the future. Time-based awards are subject to the compensation deduction limitation. Although the Compensation Committee generally seeks to preserve the federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid, in order to maintain flexibility in compensating executives, including our NEOs, in a manner designed to promote our corporate goals, including retaining and incentivizing the NEOs, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be deductible.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  56
Adjustment or Recovery of Awards
Back to Contents

ADJUSTMENT OR RECOVERY OF AWARDS

The Company believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to create and maintain a culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability and that reinforces the Company’s overall compensation philosophy. In furtherance of this goal our board of directors has adopted a clawback policy whichthat applies to performance or incentive-based compensation approved, awarded or granted to a Covered Executive (as defined below) beginning on, or after, January 1, 2017 and whichthat provides for the possible recoupment of performance or incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws (other than due to a change in applicable accounting methods, rules or interpretations), the result of which is. This means that any performance or incentive-based compensation, whether cash or equity - denominated, paid to such Covered Executive during the three-year period preceding the publication of the restated financial statements would have been lower had it been calculated based on such restated financial statements. For the purposes of this clawback policy, the term Covered Executive“Covered Executive” shall mean any Named Executive OfficerNEO as determined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K and other key employees identified by the Compensation Committee, and includes our NEOs.

Relationship of Compensation Practices to Risk Management

RELATIONSHIP OF COMPENSATION PRACTICES TO RISK MANAGEMENT

When structuring our overall compensation practices for our employees generally, consideration is given as to whether the structure creates incentives for risk-taking behavior and therefore impacts our risk management practices. Attention is given to the elements and the mix of pay as well as ensuring that employees’ awards align with stockholders’ value.

The Compensation Committee has assessed the compensation policies and practices for our employees, including our NEOs, and concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee generally considers whether our compensation programs encourage excessive risk taking during its annual review of such programs, which typically occurs during the first quarter of each year.

Compensation Committee Report

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A section of this proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommends that it be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

Richard J. Osborne (Chair)


Lizabeth A. Ardisana
Teresa M. Brenner

Steven Osgood
G.Osgood

April 14, 2020

19, 2023

The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.



2019 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position 
Year 
 
Salary ($) (1)
 
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
 
Non-equity 
incentive plan compensation 
($) (3)
 
All other compensation ($) (4)
 
Total ($) 
Jeffrey W. Eckel, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 2019 639,500
 3,991,140
 595,305
 21,555
 5,247,500
 2018 632,833
 3,151,259
 1,421,289
 21,405
 5,226,786
 2017 619,500
 3,559,149
 
 20,575
 4,199,224
             
Jeffrey A. Lipson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (5)
 2019 302,436
 872,100
 235,594
 14,000
 1,424,130
 2018 
 
 
 
 
 2017 
 
 
 
 
             
J. Brendan Herron, Executive Vice President 2019 393,333
 1,861,225
 265,500
 14,000
 2,534,058
 2018 373,333
 1,381,999
 623,438
 13,750
 2,392,520
 2017 360,000
 1,476,404
 
 13,500
 1,849,904
             
Nathaniel J. Rose, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer 2019 374,625
 1,207,845
 300,682
 14,000
 1,897,152
 2018 357,208
 1,094,183
 669,985
 13,750
 2,135,126
 2017 338,417
 1,114,791
 
 13,500
 1,466,708
             
Steven L. Chuslo, Executive Vice President and General Counsel 2019 360,000
 1,050,300
 239,513
 14,000
 1,663,813
 2018 358,333
 1,003,601
 589,500
 13,750
 1,965,184
 2017 355,000
 1,050,456
 
 13,500
 1,418,956
             
Daniel K. McMahon, Executive Vice President 2019 350,667
 1,050,300
 231,471
 14,000
 1,646,438
 2018 335,333
 970,254
 561,094
 13,750
 1,880,431
 2017 322,000
 987,209
 
 13,500
 1,322,709

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  57

2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position(1) Year Salary ($)(1) Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)(3)
 All other
compensation
($)(4)
 Total ($)
Jeffrey W. Eckel
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
 2022 825,000 4,430,369 2,743,125 15,250 8,013,744
 2021 763,167 5,857,833 2,598,750 21,855 9,241,605
 2020 639,500 2,385,784 951,256 21,705 3,998,245
Jeffrey A. Lipson
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer
and Executive Vice President
 2022 525,000 1,298,388 1,496,250 15,250 3,334,888
 2021 483,333 1,940,563 1,417,500 14,500 3,855,896
 2020 383,333 723,034 425,000 14,250 1,545,617
Susan D. Nickey
Executive Vice President and Chief Client Officer(5)
 2022 390,000 932,724 957,500 15,250 2,295,474
 2021 350,448 1,199,478 832,500 14,500 2,396,926
Marc T. Pangburn
Executive Vice President and
Co-Chief Investment Officer(5)
 2022 390,000 932,724 957,500 15,250 2,295,474
 2021 336,667 891,730 832,500 14,500 2,075,397
Nathaniel J. Rose
Executive Vice President and
Co-Chief Investment Officer
 2022 415,000 1,284,967 1,182,750 15,250 2,897,967
 2021 406,667 2,066,465 1,120,500 14,500 3,608,132
 2020 386,667 930,409 497,250 14,250 1,828,576
(1)See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Base Salary” for further salary information.
Principal position for the persons shown reflect their positions as of December 31, 2022. As of March 1, 2023, Mr. Eckel transitioned to the role of Executive Chair, Mr. Lipson became our chief executive officer and president and Mr. Pangburn became our CFO.
(2)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of restricted shares of Common Stock, RSUs or LTIP units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192022 (Note 2 and Note 11, Equity). See Equity Incentive2013 Plan, 2022 Plan and Grants of Plan-Based Awards below for additional information on share grants.
(3)See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Incentive Compensation—20182021 Bonus Awards awarded in 2019”2022” for further information on the non-equity incentive plan compensation earned for 20182020 and paid in 2019.2021. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Incentive Compensation—20192022 Bonus Awards awarded in 2020”2023” for non-equity incentive compensation earned in 20192022 and paid in 2020.
2023.
(4)Other compensation includes the Company’s matching contribution to each NEO’s 401(k) planaccount of $14,000$15,250 for 2019, $13,7502022, $14,500 for 20182021 and $13,500$14,250 for 20172020 and $7,555, $7,655$0, $7,355 and $7,075$7,455 in insurance premiums for 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively, for $5,000,000 of life insurance for Mr. Eckel, approximately $500,000 of which is for the benefit of the Company.
(5)Ms. Nickey and Mr. Pangburn became named executive officers in 2021.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  58
Back to Contents
(5)Mr. Lipson joined the Company in 2019 and was appointed chief financial officer and became an NEO on March 1, 2019.



Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2019
    
Estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards
 
 
Estimated future payouts
under equity incentive plan awards
 
 
All other stock awards: number of shares of stock or units (#) (2)
 
Grant date fair value of stock and option awards ($) (3)
Name and Principal Position Grant
Date
 
Threshold 
($)
 
Target 
($)
 
Maximum 
($) 
 
Threshold 
(#) (1)
 
Target 
(#) (1)
 
Maximum (#) (1) 
 
Jeffrey W. Eckel, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 4/1/2019    38,000
 76,000
 152,000
 
 2,028,820
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 76,000
 1,962,320
                   
Jeffrey A. Lipson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 4/1/2019       5,000
 10,000
 20,000
 
 266,950
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 10,000
 258,200
 2/13/2019    
 
 
 15,000
 346,950
                   
J. Brendan Herron, Executive Vice President 4/1/2019    15,750
 31,500
 63,000
 
 840,893
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 31,500
 813,330
 3/13/2019    
 
 
 8,300
 207,002
                   
Nathaniel J. Rose, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer 4/1/2019    11,500
 23,000
 46,000
 
 613,985
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 23,000
 593,860
                   
Steven L. Chuslo, Executive Vice President and General Counsel 4/1/2019    10,000
 20,000
 40,000
 
 533,900
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 20,000
 516,400
                   
Daniel K. McMahon, Executive Vice
President
 4/1/2019    10,000
 20,000
 40,000
 
 533,900
 4/1/2019    
 
 
 20,000
 516,400

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2022

    Estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards(1)
 Estimated future payouts under
equity incentive plan awards
 All other
stock awards:
 Grant date
Name and Principal Position Grant Date Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)(2)
 Target
(#)(2)
 Maximum
(#)(2)
 number of
shares of
stock or units
(#)(3)
 fair value
of stock
and option
awards ($)(4)
Jeffrey W. Eckel
Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer
 3/25/22       43,933 2,024,433
 3/25/22    21,966 43,932 87,864  2,405,936
    2,743,125     
Jeffrey A. Lipson
Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Operating Officer and
Executive Vice President
 3/25/22       12,874 593,234
 3/25/22    6,438 12,876 25,752  705,154
    1,496,250     
Susan D. Nickey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Client Officer
 3/25/22       9,248 426,148
 3/25/22    4,625 9,250 18,500  506,576
    957,500     
Marc T. Pangburn
Executive Vice President and
Co-Chief Investment Officer
 3/25/22       9,248 426,148
 3/25/22    4,625 9,250 18,500  506,576
    957,500     
Nathaniel J. Rose
Executive Vice President and
Co-Chief Investment Officer
 3/25/22       12,742 587,151
 3/25/22    6,371 12,742 25,484  697,816
    1,182,750     
(1)The amounts reported represent 2022 cash incentive compensation paid in 2023. The calculation of the actual amounts paid is discussed in “CD&A—Annual Incentive Compensation or Bonuses” above.
(1)(2)Represents OP units that could be earned under awards of LTIP units which may, if the value of our operating partnership appreciates, may be exchanged for OP units. The LTIP units vest based on the achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A—Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019”2022” above.
(2)(3)The awards represent restricted stock and OP units that could be earned under awards of LTIP units, which vest based on the achievement of certain targets, granted under our Equity Incentive Plan. The second award for each NEO was granted for the 20192022 Long-Term Incentive program under our Equity Incentivethe 2022 Plan. A description of the terms for the second award for each NEO of the restricted stock appears at “CD&A—Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019”2022” above. The third award for Mr. Herron is a grant of restricted stock for the 2018 annual incentive compensation that vests in May 2020. The third award for Mr. Lipson is a grant of restricted stock made upon his hire that vests in four equal amounts in March 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.
(3)(4)Amounts shown in this column represent the estimated grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of shares of restricted Common Stock and RSUsLTIP units granted under our Equity Incentivethe 2022 Plan. A description of the terms and the grant fair value for the first and second award for each NEO of the restricted stock appears at “CD&A—Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019”2022” above. A description of the terms and grant date fair value for the third award for Mr. Herron appears at “CD&A—2018 Bonus Awards awarded in 2019.” The third award for Mr. Lipson is valued at $23.13 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE at the date of grant.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table
We have entered into

NARRATIVE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Employment Agreements

As of December 31, 2022, we had employment agreements with each of our NEOs. NEOs, which we summarize below. As of March 1, 2023, Mr. Eckel transitioned to the role of Executive Chair, Mr. Lipson became our chief executive officer and president and Mr. Pangburn became our CFO. Each entered into new or amended employment agreements, as applicable, with the Company in connection with this leadership transition. Summaries of the new or amended employment agreements, which became effective on March 1, 2023, have also been provided below.

Employment Agreements as of December 31, 2022

The employment agreements for Messrs. Eckel Herron,and Rose Chuslo and McMahon each provide for automatic one-year extensions unless either party provides at least 90 days’ notice of non-renewal. Each employment agreement was extended in 2019.2021. The amendedemployment agreements for Messrs. Lipson and restated employment agreement for Mr. Lipson, which we entered into on April 13, 2020, providesPangburn and Ms. Nickey provide that the term of Mr. Lipson'ssuch party’s employment shall continue until either party provides at least 30 days'days’ notice of termination. These employment agreements require our NEOs to devote substantially all of their time to our affairs.

The employment agreements provide for:

an annual base salary no less than those listed in “CD&A—Base Salaries” above, subject to increases at the discretion of our board of directors or the Compensation Committee,
eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses based on the satisfaction of performance goals established by our board of directors or the Compensation Committee, which will be awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee,

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  59
an annual base salary no less than those listed in “CD&A—Base Salaries” above, subject to increases at the discretion of our board of directors or the Compensation Committee,
Back to Contents


eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses based on the satisfaction of performance goals established by our board of directors or the Compensation Committee, which will be awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee,
participation in our long-term incentive program, as well as other incentive, savings and retirement plans applicable generally to our senior executives,
medical and other group welfare plan coverage and fringe benefits provided to our senior executives, and
for Mr. Eckel only, payment of the premiums for a long-term disability insurance policy which provide benefits equal to at least 300% of his annual base salary and payment of the premiums for a term life insurance policy in the amount of $5,000,000 for the benefit of his heirs.
participation in our long-term incentive program, as well as other incentive, savings and retirement plans applicable generally to our senior executives,
medical and other group welfare plan coverage and fringe benefits provided to our senior executives, and
for Mr. Eckel only, payment of the premiums for a long-term disability insurance policy which provides benefits equal to at least 300% of his annual base salary and payment of the premiums for a term life insurance policy in the amount of $5,000,000 for the benefit of his heirs.

Our NEOs are eligible for annual bonuses and regular, annual grants of restricted stock, stock options, OP units or other awards pursuant to our Equity Incentive2022 Plan described below.below and pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements related to such grants. See CD&A above for further information on the annual bonuses and Equity Incentive2022 Plan grants.

The employment agreements for Messrs. Eckel Herron,and Rose Chuslo and McMahon provide that, if an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause“cause” or by the executive for good reason“good reason” (each as defined in the applicable employment agreement), or as a result of our notice of non-renewal of the applicable employment term, the executive will be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims:

accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,

accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,
an amount equal to the sum of the executive’s then-current annual base salary plus the greater of his annual average bonus over the prior three years (or such fewer years with respect to which the executive received an annual bonus) and the executive’s target annual bonus for the year of termination, multiplied by three for Mr. Eckel and by 1.5 for each of Messrs. McMahon and Rose,
for Mr. Eckel only, a prorated annual bonus based on the maximum annual bonus that the executive could have earned for the year of termination and the number of days employed in the year of termination,
health benefits for the executive and his eligible family members for two years following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable benefits from a subsequent employer, and
100% of the unvested stock or stock-based awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

Mr. Eckel, by two for each of Messrs. Herron, and Chuslo, and by 1.5 for each of Messrs. Rose and McMahon,

for Mr. Eckel only, a prorated annual bonus based on the maximum annual bonus that the executive could have earned for the year of termination and the number of days employed in the year of termination,
health benefits for the executive and his eligible family members for two years following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable benefits from a subsequent employer, and
100% of the unvested stock or stock-based awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

Mr. Lipson'sLipson’s employment agreement provides that if his employment is terminated by us for reasons other than for "cause"“cause” or by him for good reason“good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), he will be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims:

    •     

accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,
an amount equal to the sum of eighteen months of his then-current annual base salary and 150% of his annual average bonus over the prior three years (or such fewer years with respect to which he received an annual bonus),
health benefits for eighteen months following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable benefits from a subsequent employer, and
100% of the unvested stock or stock-based awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

Ms. Nickey and Mr. Pangburn’s employment agreements each provide that if his or her employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by him or her for “good reason” (each as defined in the applicable employment agreement), he or she will be entitled to the date of termination,


•     an amount equal to the sum of eighteen months of his then-current annual base salaryfollowing severance payments and 150% of his annual average bonus over the prior three years (or such fewer years with respect to which he received an annual bonus), and

    •     health benefits, for eighteen months following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable benefits fromhis or her execution and non-revocation of a subsequent employer.
general release of claims:

accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,
an amount equal to 100% of his or her annual average bonus over the prior three years (or such fewer years with respect to which he or she received an annual bonus),
health benefits for one year following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable benefits from a subsequent employer, and
100% of the unvested stock or stock-based awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

The employment agreements provide that the executive or histhe executive’s estate will be entitled to certain severance benefits in the event of his death or disability. Specifically, each executive or, in the event of the executive’s death, histhe executive’s beneficiaries will receive:

accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,
for Mr. Eckel upon death or disability, and for Messrs. Lipson, Pangburn and Rose and Ms. Nickey, upon death only, his prorated annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs,
for Messrs. Lipson, Pangburn and Rose and Ms. Nickey, upon disability only, the target annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs,
for Mr. Eckel upon disability only, proceeds from long-term disability insurance policy of 300% of his annual base salary,
for Mr. Eckel upon death only, proceeds of a term life insurance policy in the amount of $5,000,000,
for Messrs. Eckel and Rose health benefits for the executive and/or his eligible family members for two years following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding executive’s death or disability, and
100% of the unvested equity awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  60
accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus and other benefits earned and accrued but unpaid prior to the date of termination,
Back to Contents
for Mr. Eckel upon death or disability, and for Messrs. Lipson, Herron, Rose, Chuslo, and McMahon, upon death only, his prorated annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs,
for Messrs. Lipson, Herron, Rose, Chuslo, and McMahon, upon disability only, the target annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs,
for Mr. Eckel upon disability only, proceeds from long-term disability insurance policy of 300% of his annual base salary,
for Mr. Eckel upon death only, proceeds of a term life insurance policy in the amount of $5,000,000,


for Messrs. Eckel, Herron, Rose, Chuslo, and McMahon, health benefits for the executive and/or his eligible family members for two years following the executive’s termination of employment at the same level as in effect immediately preceding executive’s death or disability, and
100% of the unvested equity awards held by the executive will become fully vested and/or exercisable.

The employment agreement for Mr. Eckel includes the occurrence of a change“change in controlcontrol” (as defined in the employment agreement) in the definition of good reason such that the occurrence of a change in control will entitle Mr. Eckel to trigger the severance obligations for any reason following a change in control. The employment agreements for Messrs. Herron,Mr. Rose Chuslo, and McMahon provideprovides for a modified definition of good reason“good reason” following a change-in-control (as defined in the applicable employment agreement). The employment agreements for Messrs. Herron,Mr. Rose Chuslo, and McMahon also provideprovides for 100% of the unvested stock (or stock-based) awards held by the executive to become fully vested and/or exercisable upon the effective date of a change in control. The employment agreement for Mr. Lipson provides for 100% of his unvested time-based stock (or stock-based) awards to become fully vested and/or exercisable in the event his employment is terminated other than for cause within 60 days before or 90 days after a change in control, and for the effect of a termination of employment before or after a change in control on his performance-based stock (or stock-based) awards to be determined in accordance with the applicable agreements under which such awards were granted.

The employment agreements for Messrs. Lipson, Herron,Pangburn, and Rose Chuslo, and McMahonMs. Nickey provide that if all, or any portion, of the payments provided under the employment agreements, either alone or together with other payments or benefits that the executive receives or is entitled to receive from us or an affiliate, would constitute excess“excess parachute paymentspayments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), then these payments may be reduced so that no portion of the parachute payment would be subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and non-deductible by us under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

The employment agreements also contain standard confidentiality provisions, which apply indefinitely, and both non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, which apply during the term of the employment agreements and, for Messrs. Herron,Pangburn and Rose Chuslo, and McMahon,Ms. Nickey, for a period of 12 months following termination of employment, and, for Mr. Lipson, for a period of 18 months following termination of employment.

March 1, 2023 Leadership Transition

Transition of Jeffrey W. Eckel to Executive Chair

Mr. Eckel transitioned from our chief executive officer and president and was designated to serve as our executive chair. Mr. Eckel will serve as executive chair for two years. On March 1, 2025, our Board will designate Mr. Eckel to serve as our non-executive chair. In connection with this transition, we have entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Eckel. Mr. Eckel’s two-year employment agreement includes an annual base salary of $412,500 and a target annual bonus of 237% of Mr. Eckel’s base salary. On March 1, 2023, we granted, and on March 1, 2024, we will grant, to Mr. Eckel an equity compensation award with a target value of $3,285,750, subject to vesting and performance requirements.

During the term (and, if Mr. Eckel’s employment is terminated during the term due to his disability or death, for the period after such termination of employment due to disability or death as is necessary for Mr. Eckel’s disability or death to be covered by the applicable policy), we will maintain and pay the cost of (A) a term life insurance policy with a death benefit in the amount of $5,000,000 on the life of Mr. Eckel and (B) a long-term disability insurance policy for Mr. Eckel which would provide disability benefits to Mr. Eckel in an annual amount not less than 300% of the Mr. Eckel’s annual base salary.

If Mr. Eckel is terminated due to his disability or death, Mr. Eckel or his estate will receive any accrued but unpaid salary and annual bonus, plus a pro rata target bonus for the year in which his termination of employment occurs. For 24 months following such a termination, we will subsidize the cost of Mr. Eckel’s post-employment health coverage. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Eckel will become vested and nonforfeitable.

If Mr. Eckel is terminated without cause or leaves employment for good reason, he will be entitled to severance equal to one year of his base salary, one times the greater of the average of his annual bonus for the previous three years or the target bonus for the year of his termination, as well as a pro-rata target bonus for the year of termination. For 24 months following such a termination, we will subsidize the cost of Mr. Eckel’s post-employment health coverage. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Eckel will become vested and nonforfeitable.

If Mr. Eckel is terminated for cause, leaves employment without good reason or his term expires, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid base salary and annual bonus. Mr. Eckel is subject to typical restrictive covenant provisions following termination of the employment.

Appointment of Jeffrey A. Lipson as Chief Executive Officer

We appointed Mr. Lipson to chief executive officer and president, and we have entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Lipson.

Mr. Lipson’s employment agreement includes an annual base salary of $775,000 and a target annual bonus of 175% of Mr. Lipson’s base salary. Mr. Lipson will be eligible to receive equity compensation awards when awards are made to similarly situated senior executives of the Company.

During the term (and, if Mr. Lipson’s employment is terminated during the term due to his disability or death, for the period after such termination of employment due to disability or death as is necessary for Mr. Lipson’s disability or death to be covered by the applicable policy), we will maintain and pay the cost of (A) a term life insurance policy with a death benefit in the amount of $5,000,000 on the life of Mr. Lipson and (B) a long-term disability insurance policy for Mr. Lipson which would provide disability benefits to Mr. Lipson in an annual amount not less than 300% of his annual base salary.

If Mr. Lipson is terminated due to his disability or death, Mr. Lipson or his estate will receive any accrued but unpaid salary and annual bonus, plus a pro rata target bonus for the year in which his termination of employment occurs. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Lipson will become vested and nonforfeitable.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  61

If Mr. Lipson is terminated without cause or leaves employment for good reason, he will be entitled to severance equal to three times the sum of (A) one year of his base salary, (B) the greater of the average of his annual bonus for the previous three years or the target bonus for the year of his termination, plus (C) a pro-rata target bonus for the year of termination. For 24 months following such a termination, we will subsidize the cost of Mr. Lipson’s post-employment health coverage. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Lipson will become vested and nonforfeitable.

If Mr. Lipson is terminated for cause or leaves employment without good reason, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid base salary and annual bonus. Mr. Lipson is subject to typical restrictive covenant provisions following termination of the employment.

Appointment of Marc T. Pangburn as Chief Financial Officer

We appointed Mr. Pangburn to executive vice president and chief financial officer, and we have entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Pangburn.

Mr. Pangburn’s employment agreement includes an annual base salary of $425,000 and a target annual bonus of 150% of Mr. Pangburn’s base salary. Mr. Pangburn will be eligible to receive equity compensation awards when awards are made to similarly situated senior executives of the Company.

If Mr. Pangburn is terminated by reason of death or disability, his outstanding equity will become vested, and he or his estate will receive a pro rata target bonus for year of his death or a target bonus for the year in which the disability occurs.

If Mr. Pangburn is terminated without cause or leaves employment for good reason, he will be entitled to severance equal to one and one-half times one year of his base salary and one and one-half times the average of his annual bonus for the previous three years. For 18 months following such a termination, we will subsidize the cost of Mr. Pangburn’s post-employment health coverage. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Pangburn will become vested and nonforfeitable.

If Mr. Pangburn is terminated for cause or leaves employment without good reason, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid base salary and annual bonus.

Mr. Pangburn is subject to typical restrictive covenant provisions following termination of the employment.

2022 PLAN SUMMARY

Purpose

The following table sets forthpurpose of the potential payments2022 Plan is to each NEOuse incentives to attract retain officers, directors, key employees, consultants, advisers, and other personnel and to encourage those individuals to increase their efforts to make our business more successful. The 2022 Plan allows for grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights, LTIP units, cash-based awards, other restricted limited partnership units issued by our operating partnership and other equity-based compensation. We consider our overall compensation philosophy when we decide to grant awards under the terms2022 Plan.

Administration

The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of their employment agreementsindependent directors, administers the 2022 Plan. As discussed on page 21 of this proxy statement, we have amended the Compensation Committee’s charter to make the Compensation Committee primarily responsible administering the 2022 Plan and equity award agreements described above duefor making grants under the plan. The Compensation Committee consists of at least two individuals, each of whom is intended to various scenarios as of December 31, 2019. Amounts shown do not include (a) payment of any unpaid portion of the NEO’s base salary through the effective date of termination, (b) reimbursement for any outstanding reasonable business expense, and (c) any bonus or incentive compensation that had been accrued through the effective date of termination but not paid.

Name 
 Benefit 
Without Cause/For Good Reason / Non-renewal by Company ($) (1)
 Death ($) 
Disability ($) (2)
 
Change in Control ($) (3)
Jeffrey W. Eckel Cash 6,786,694 6,205,298
 3,123,798
 6,786,694
  Continued Health Benefits 52,187 52,187
 52,187
 52,187
  
Equity (4)
 17,749,008 17,749,008
 17,749,008
 25,241,799
Jeffrey A. Lipson Cash 1,306,790 471,188
 471,188
 1,306,790
  Continued Health Benefits 47,598 
 
 47,598
  
Equity (4)
 1,126,300 1,126,300
 1,126,300
 1,448,100
J. Brendan Herron Cash 1,879,690 538,500
 538,500
 1,879,690
  Continued Health Benefits 72,349 72,349
 72,349
 72,349
  
Equity (4)
 6,312,300 6,312,300
 6,312,300
 9,176,191
Nathaniel J. Rose Cash 1,425,000 613,890
 613,890
 1,425,000
  Continued Health Benefits 41,521 41,521
 41,521
 41,521
  
Equity (4)
 4,429,159 4,429,159
 4,429,159
 6,512,041
Steven L. Chuslo Cash 1,631,750 484,650
 484,650
 1,631,750
  Continued Health Benefits 66,987 66,987
 66,987
 66,987
  
Equity  (4)
 4,000,746 4,000,746
 4,000,746
 5,831,402
Daniel K. McMahon Cash 1,198,125 477,919
 477,919
 1,198,125
  Continued Health Benefits 50,819 50,819
 50,819
 50,819
  
Equity  (4)
 3,957,818 3,957,818
 3,957,818
 5,756,294


(1)This column describes the payments and benefits that become payable if the Company elects not to renew the NEO's employment agreement, if employment is terminated by the Company without cause, or if employment is terminated by the NEO for good reason.
For Mr. Eckel, the term "cause" means (i)  conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony involving moral turpitude, deceit, dishonesty or fraud (but excluding traffic violations) that is injuriousbe, to the business or reputation ofextent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Company; (ii) willful and material misconduct in connection with the performance of his duties, including, without limitation, embezzlement or the misappropriation of funds or property of the Company; (iii) failure to adhere to the lawful directions of theExchange Act, a non-employee director. If no compensation committee exists, our board of directors will exercise the functions of our committee.

Awards Under the 2022 Plan

Shares of Restricted Common Stock

A restricted stock award is an award of shares of Common Stock that are subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions the Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. Grants of shares of restricted Common Stock will be subject to vesting schedules and other restrictions that the Compensation Committee sets. The restrictions may lapse separately or to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to the Company, in either event, which continues for a period of 30 business days after written demand for corrective action is delivered by the Company; or (iv) material breach of (x) any covenant contained in the employment agreement; or (y) the other terms and provisions of the employment agreement and, in each case, failure to curecombination at such breach within 10 days following written notice from the Company specifyingtimes, under such breach.

For Messrs. Lipson, Herron, Rose, Chuslo, and McMahon, the term "cause" means the NEO's (i) commission of, and indictment for or formal admission to, a felony involving moral turpitude, deceit, dishonesty or fraud (but excluding traffic violations); (ii) willful and material misconduct in connection with the performance of the NEO's duties,circumstances, including, without limitation, embezzlementa specified period of employment or the misappropriationsatisfaction of fundspre-established criteria, in such installments or property ofotherwise, as the Company; (iii) failure to adhereCompensation Committee may determine.

Except to the lawful directions of the CEO, to adhere to the Company’s policies and practices or to devote substantiallyextent restricted under an applicable award agreement, a restricted stockholder has all of the NEO’s business time and efforts to the Company, which failure continues forrights of a period of 30 business days after written demand for corrective action is delivered by the Company; or (iv) material breach of (x) any covenant contained in the employment agreement; or (y) the other terms and provisions of the employment agreement and, in each case, failure to cure such breach within 10 days following written notice from the Company specifying such breach.

The term "good reason" means (i) any change in job title or material diminution in the NEO’s roles and responsibilities from those set forth in the employment agreements (including,stockholder, including, without limitation, the assignmentright to vote and the right to receive cash dividends on the shares of duties inconsistentrestricted Common Stock. Although we will pay dividends on shares of restricted Common Stock, whether or not vested, at the same rate and on the same date as on shares of our common stock (unless we provide otherwise in an award agreement), holders of shares of restricted Common Stock are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  62
Phantom Shares and RSUs

A phantom share represents a right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, or, if provided by the Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of common stock in excess of a base value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. A phantom share may also be known as a “Restricted Stock Unit” or “RSU,” which is an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver shares of Common Stock, cash, other securities or other property, subject to certain restrictions (which may include, without limitation, a requirement that the grantee remain continuously employed or provide continuous services for a specified period of time). Our current practice is to refer to all such awards as RSUs.

RSUs will vest as provided in the applicable award agreement. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of the grant, RSUs may generally be settled in cash or by transfer of shares of Common Stock (as provided in the grant agreement).

Dividend Equivalents

A dividend equivalent is a right to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or shares of Common Stock) of dividends paid on shares of Common Stock otherwise subject to an award. The Compensation Committee may provide that amounts payable with respect to dividend equivalents will be converted into cash or additional shares of Common Stock. The Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of dividend equivalents as it deems appropriate.

Restricted Limited Partnership Units

A restricted limited partnership unit may be granted as a unit in our operating partnership (an OP unit) or may include LTIP units, which are structured as profits interests in our operating partnership, providing distributions to the holder of the award based on the achievement of specified levels of profitability by the operating partnership or the achievement of certain goals or events. Initially, LTIP units will not have full parity with OP units with respect to liquidating distributions. Under the terms of the LTIP units, the operating partnership will revalue its assets upon the occurrence of certain specified events, and any increase in valuation from the time of grant until such event will be allocated first to the holders of LTIP units to equalize the capital accounts of such holders with the NEO's position or,capital accounts of OP unit holders. Upon equalization of the capital accounts of the holders of LTIP units with other holders of OP units, the LTIP units will achieve full parity with OP units of the operating partnership for Mr. Eckel only, no longer beingall purposes, including with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units may be converted into an equal number of OP units, and thereafter enjoy all the chairmanrights of ourOP units. The Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of restricted OP units as it deems appropriate.

Amendments and Termination

Our board of directors andmay amend the senior-most executive of2022 Plan as it deems advisable, except that it may not amend the Company); (ii)2022 Plan in any way that would adversely affect a reductionparticipant with respect to an award previously granted unless the amendment is required in order to comply with applicable laws.

2013 PLAN

We adopted the NEO’s annual salary or annual bonus potential; (iii) a relocation of the Company’s headquarters outside a 30 mile radius of Annapolis, MD or moving of the NEO’s office or place of performance from the Company’s headquarters; (iv) a material breach by the Company of the employment agreement or any other material agreement between the NEO and the Company; or (v) for Mr. Eckel only, there shall have occurred a change in control. For Messrs. Herron, Rose, Chuslo, and McMahon, following a change in control the definition of good reason set forth is modified to delete all references to the term "material." For Mr. Lipson, the definition is applicable only following a change in control and does not include references to the term "material."

(2)The term "disability" means that the NEO has become physically or mentally incapable of performing the duties under the employment agreement and such disability has disabled the NEO for a cumulative period of 180 days within any 12-month period.
(3)The term "change in control" is defined in "—Change in Control" below.
(4)Includes the value of accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards granted to the NEO. The acceleration value of the restricted stock was calculated using the closing price of $32.18 per share on December 31, 2019. For termination without cause, termination for good reason, non-renewal by the Company, death or disability, the number of performance shares reported is based on the target level of performance. For change in control, the number of performance shares reported is based on the actual level of performance through December 31, 2019 for awards granted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 and the target level of performance for awards granted prior to 2017.
Equity Incentive Plan
We have adopted our Equity Incentive2013 Plan to provide equity-based incentive compensation to members of our senior management team, our independent directors, employees, advisers, consultants and other personnel. Unless terminated earlier or renewed,Upon approval of the 2022 Plan at our Equity Incentiveannual meeting on June 2, 2022, our board of directors ceased grants of new awards under the 2013 Plan. However, the 2013 Plan will terminate ten years after its adoption but will continuecontinues to govern unexpired awards. Our Equity Incentive Plan allows for grants of stock options, shares of restricted Common Stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights, RSUs, LTIP units (as described below) and other equity-based awards.
Our Equity Incentive

The 2013 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, as appointed by our board of directors, has the full authority to (1) authorize the granting of awards to eligible persons, (2) determine the eligibility of directors, members of our senior management team, employees, advisors, consultants and other personnel to receive an equity award, (3) determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by each award (subject to the individual participant limitations



provided in our Equity Incentive Plan), (4) determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each award (which may not be inconsistent with the terms of our Equity Incentive Plan), (5) prescribe the form of instruments evidencing such awards, (6) make recommendations to our board of directors with respect to equity awards that are subject to board approval and (7) take any other actions and make all other determinations that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with our Equity Incentive Plan or the administration or interpretation thereof. In connection with this authority, the Compensation Committee may, among other things, establish performance goals that must be met in order for awards to be granted or to vest, or for the restrictions on any such awards to lapse. In March 2017, we amended our Equity Incentive Plan to provide that equity awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of no less than one year. The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors, each of whom is intended to be, to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, a non-employee director.

Available Shares
Our Equity Incentive

The 2013 Plan providesprovided for grants of stock options, shares of restricted Common Stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights, LTIP units and other restricted limited partnership units issued by our Operating Partnership and other equity-based awards up to an aggregate of 7.5% of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding from time to time on a fully diluted basis (assuming, if applicable, the exercise of all outstanding options and the conversion of all warrants and convertible securities, including OP units and LTIP units, into shares of Common Stock). If an award granted under our Equity Incentivethe 2013 Plan expires, is forfeited or terminates, the shares of Common Stock subject to any portion of the award that expires, is forfeited or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards. Unless previously terminated by our board of directors, no new award may be granted under our Equity Incentive Plan after the tenth anniversary of April 23, 2013. Asawards.As of the Record Date, we had aggregate outstanding grants of 1,935,929792,796 shares of restricted Common Stock under our Equity Incentivethe 2013 Plan, which includes (i) 160,568 shares of restricted Common Stock to our NEOs, 182,58086,363 shares of restricted Common Stock to other employees, and 116,423 shares of restricted Common Stock to our independent directors, all of which are subject to certain vesting requirements, (ii) up to 301,250109,714 shares of Common Stock issuable to our NEOs, 76,109 shares of Common Stock issuable to our other employees and 43,95621,074 shares of Common Stock issuable to our independent directors upon redemption of OP units that are issuable upon time-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units, (iii) up to 602,500306,100 shares of Common Stock issuable to our NEOs and 117,548 shares of Common Stock issuable to our other employees upon redemption of OP units that are issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units and (iv) up to 279,456 shares of Common Stock issuable to our NEOs and 214,83875,888 shares of Common Stock issuable to other employees upon performance-based vesting of RSUs.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  63
To the extent the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, it will establish performance criteria and satisfy such other requirements as may be applicable in order to satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Back to Contents
Awards Under the 2013 Plan

Shares of Restricted Common Stock.

A restricted stock award is an award of shares of Common Stock that are subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions the Compensation Committee may imposeimposed at the date of grant. Grants of shares of restricted Common Stock will beare subject to vesting schedules and other restrictions as determined by the Compensation Committee. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria, in such installments or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine.has determined. Except to the extent restricted under the award agreement relating to the shares of restricted Common Stock, a participant granted shares of restricted Common Stock has all of the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends on the shares of restricted Common Stock. Although dividends will be paid on shares of restricted Common Stock, whether or not vested, at the same rate and on the same date as on shares of our Common Stock, (unless otherwise provided in an award agreement), holders of shares of restricted Common Stock are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest.

RSUs.

A RSU awardphantom share represents a right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, or, if provided by the Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of common stock in excess of a base value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. A phantom share may also be known as a “Restricted Stock Unit” or “RSU,” which is an awardunfunded and unsecured promise to deliver shares of Common Stock, cash, other securities or other property, subject to certain restrictions (which may include, without limitation, a requirement that the grantee remain continuously employed or provide continuous services for a specified period of time). Our current practice is to refer to all such awards as RSUs. RSU awards previously issued under the 2013 Plan were awards of units that are converted into Common Stock at a conversion rate that is based upon the achievement of pre-established criteria and such other restrictions that the Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria, in such installments or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine.has determined. A participant granted RSUs under these 2013 Plan awards does not have the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote the shares of restricted Common Stock and holders of RSUs are prohibited from selling such units until they vest. The Compensation Committee may elect to provide the right to receive dividends or provide for dividend equivalents. Under the current form of the RSU Award Agreement used for 2013 Plan awards, dividend equivalents will accrue on the RSUs from the grant date, but the grantee is not entitled to receive dividend equivalents until the RSUs vest. In addition, the terms of the performance based RSUs previously granted under the 2013 Plan for a change of control provide that the units shall vest upon a change of control, with the performance period ending immediately prior to the consummation of the change of control and the performance targets prorated on a straight-line basis for such shortened period.



Dividend Equivalents.

A dividend equivalent is a right to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or shares of Common Stock) of dividends paid on shares of Common Stock otherwise subject to an award. The Compensation Committee may provide that amounts payable with respect to dividend equivalents shall be converted into cash or additional shares of Common Stock. The Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of dividend equivalents as it deems appropriate.

Restricted Limited Partnership Units.

OP Unitsunits may be issued by our Operating Partnership. A restricted limited partnership unit represents an OP unit or may include LTIP units that are structured as profits interests in our Operating Partnership, providing distributions to the holder of the award based on the achievement of specified levels of profitability by our Operating Partnership or the achievement of certain goals or events. The Compensation Committee may electhave elected to provide the right to receive dividends or provide for dividend equivalents. Initially, LTIP units will not have full parity with OP units with respect to liquidating distributions. Under the terms of the LTIP units, the Operating Partnership will revalue its assets upon the occurrence of certain specified events, and any increase in valuation from the time of grant until such event will be allocated first to the holders of LTIP units to equalize the capital accounts of such holders with the capital accounts of OP unit holders. Upon equalization of the capital accounts of the holders of LTIP units with other holders of OP units, the LTIP units will achieve full parity with OP units of our Operating Partnership for all purposes, including with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units may be converted into an equal number of OP units, and thereafter enjoy all the rights of OP units, including the option to convert to shares of Common Stock. The Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of restricted OP units as it deems appropriate.

Other Share-Based Awards. Our Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the granting of other awards based upon shares of our Common Stock (including the grant of securities convertible into shares of Common Stock, stock options and phantom shares), subject to terms and conditions established at the time of grant.
We have filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the shares of our Common Stock issuable under our Equity Incentive Plan.

Change in Control

Under our Equity Incentivethe 2013 Plan, a change in control is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) the acquisition of more than 50% of our then outstanding shares of Common Stock or the combined voting power of our outstanding securities by any person; (2) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, other than certain sales and dispositions to entities owned by our stockholders; (3) a merger, consolidation or statutory share exchange where our stockholders immediately prior to such event hold less than 50% of the voting power of the surviving or resulting entity; (4) during any consecutive 24 calendar month period, the members of our board of directors at the beginning of such period, the incumbent“incumbent directors,,” cease for any reason (other than due to death) to constitute at least a majority of the members of our board of directors (for these purposes, any director whose election or nomination for election was approved or ratified by a vote of at least a majority of the incumbent directors shall be deemed to be an incumbent director); or (5) stockholder approval of a plan or proposal for our liquidation or dissolution.

Upon a change in control, awards may be subject to accelerated automatic or conditional accelerated vesting depending on the terms of the grant agreement establishing the award. In addition, the Compensation Committee may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the change in control, but only if the Compensation Committee determines that the adjustments do not have an adverse economic impact on the participants (as determined at the time of the adjustments).

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  64
Amendments and Termination
Back to Contents
Our board of directors may amend, suspend, alter or discontinue our Equity Incentive Plan but cannot take any action that would impair the rights of an award recipient with respect to an award previously granted without such award recipient’s consent unless such amendments are required in order to comply with applicable laws. Our board of directors may not amend our Equity Incentive Plan without stockholder approval in any case in which amendment in the absence of such approval would cause our Equity Incentive Plan to fail to comply with any applicable legal requirement or NYSE or similar requirement, such as an amendment that would:
other than through adjustment as provided in our Equity Incentive Plan, increase the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under our Equity Incentive Plan;
materially expand the class of directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors eligible to participate in our Equity Incentive Plan;
reprice any stock options under our Equity Incentive Plan; or
otherwise require such approval.


Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2022 FISCAL YEAR END

The following table summarizes all outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs on December 31, 2019.     

  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) (Exercisable) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) (Unexercisable) 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)
 
Option Exercise Price ($) 
 Option Expiration Date 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares or Units of Common Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Shares or Units of Common Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (2) 
Jeffrey W. Eckel      784,394 25,241,799
Jeffrey A. Lipson      45,000 1,448,100
J. Brendan Herron      285,152 9,176,191
Nathaniel J. Rose      202,363 6,512,041
Steven L. Chuslo      181,212 5,831,402
Daniel K. McMahon      178,878 5,756,294
2022.

  Stock Awards 
 Name Number of
Shares or Units
of Common
Stock That Have
Not Vested (#)(1)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Common
Stock That Have
Not Vested ($)(2)
Jeffrey W. Eckel  183,130   5,307,107 
Jeffrey A. Lipson  53,334   1,545,619 
Susan D. Nickey  36,632   1,061,595 
Marc T. Pangburn  39,134   1,134,103 
Nathaniel J. Rose  54,928   1,591,813 

(1)
(1)The following chart summarizes the vesting of the awards by NEO:

Name and Principal Position
 Shares or Units Vesting
Jeffrey W. Eckel16,0843/5/2023
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 180,26023,334 See Note 3
  21,05460,313 3/5/2020See Note 4
  189,48043,933 See Note 45
  41,40017,500 See Note 56
  124,20021,966 See Note 67
Jeffrey A. Lipson3,9173/5/2023
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President6,667See Note 3
  76,00014,688 See Note 74
  152,00012,874 See Note 5
5,000See Note 6
6,438See Note 7
3,750See Note 8
Jeffrey A. Lipson, Susan D. Nickey8263/5/2023
Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialClient Officer 10,0003,334 See Note 73
  20,0003,098 See Note 84
  15,0009,248 See Note 9
J. Brendan Herron, Executive Vice President 39,570See Note 35
  10,5402,500 3/5/2020See Note 6
  63,2404,626 See Note 47
  17,25013,000 3/5/2023
Marc T. Pangburn1,3533/5/2023
Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Investment Officer3,334See Note 53
  51,7525,073 See Note 64
  31,5009,248 See Note 75
  63,0002,500 See Note 86
  8,3004,626 5/15/2020
Nathaniel J. Rose, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer 29,677See Note 37
  7,58413,000 3/5/20202023

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  65
Name and Principal PositionShares or UnitsVesting
Nathaniel J. Rose5,0843/5/2022
Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Investment Officer6,667See Note 3
  45,50019,063 See Note 4
  12,65012,742 See Note 5
  37,9525,000 See Note 6
  23,0006,372See Note 7
  46,000See Note 8
Steven L. Chuslo, Executive Vice President and General Counsel29,677See Note 3
6,8343/5/2020
41,000See Note 4
10,925See Note 5
32,776See Note 6
20,000See Note 7
 40,000See Note 8
Daniel K. McMahon, Executive Vice President29,677See Note 3
6,5003/5/2020
39,000See Note 4
10,925See Note 5
32,776See Note 6
20,000See Note 7
40,000See Note 8

(2)
(2)Valued at $32.18,$28.98, the closing price of our closing priceshares on the NYSE on December 31, 2019,30, 2022, the last day of trading for 2019.


2022.
(3)These awards are performance-based awards that vest upon the achievement of targets over a multi-year period. The specific targets have not been publicly disclosed for competitive reasons but require continued growth in our dividend.
(4)These awards are RSUs that represent the right to receive up to two shares per RSU on March 5, 2020 depending on the level of achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A-Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019” above. The table reflects two shares per RSU based on the performance against the targets through December 31, 2019, the last day of trading for 2019.
(5)These awards are time-based awardsLTIP units that vest in two equal annual amounts on March 5, 20202023 and 2021.
2024.
(6)(4)These awards are RSUs that represent the right to receive up to two shares per RSU on March 5, 2021 depending on the level of achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A-Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019” above. The table reflects two shares per RSU based on the performance against the targets through December 31, 2019, the last day of trading for 2019.
(7)These awards are time-based awards that vest in three equal annual amounts on May 15, 2020 and March 5, 2021 and 2022.
(8)These awards are LTIP units that represent the right to receive up to one OP unit per LTIP unit on March 5, 20222023 depending on the level of achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A-Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2019”2021” above. The table reflects one0.625 OP unitunits per LTIP unit based on the performance against the targets through December 31, 2019,30, 2022, the last day of trading for 2019.
2022.
(9)(5)These awards are time-based awardsLTIP units that vest in fourthree equal annual amounts on May 15, 2023 and March 5, 2024 and 2025.
(6)These awards are LTIP units that represent the right to receive up to one OP unit per LTIP unit on March 5, 2020, 2021,2024 depending on the level of achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A-Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2022” above. The table reflects 0.25 OP units per LTIP unit based on the performance against the targets through December 30, 2022, and 2023.the last day of trading for 2022.
(7)These awards are LTIP units that represent the right to receive up to one OP unit per LTIP unit on March 5, 2025 depending on the level of achievement of certain targets. See “CD&A-Long-Term Incentive Program Granted in 2021” above. The table reflects 0.25 OP units per LTIP unit based on the performance against the targets through December 30, 2022, the last day of trading for 2022.

2019 Option Exercises and Securities Vested

2022 OPTION EXERCISES AND SECURITIES VESTED

The following table summarizes the restricted stock and RSU awards that vested with respect to theour Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.2022.

  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities Acquired
on Vesting (#)
 Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
 
Jeffrey W. Eckel  235,359   11,068,924 
Jeffrey A. Lipson  47,860   2,154,557 
Susan D. Nickey  21,552   912,147 
Marc T. Pangburn  16,015   705,326 
Nathaniel J. Rose  77,909   3,603,075 

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  66
  
Stock Awards 
Name Number of Securities
Acquired on Vesting (#)
 Value Realized on Vesting
($)
Jeffrey W. Eckel 276,536
 7,059,742
Jeffrey A. Lipson 
 
J. Brendan Herron 108,801
 2,782,798
Nathaniel J. Rose 82,697
 2,118,796
Steven L. Chuslo 82,784
 2,120,710
Daniel K. McMahon 79,373
 2,032,545
Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

PENSION BENEFITS AND NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

We did not provide any pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation plans during 20182021 or 2019.

Compensation Committee Interlocks2022.

Payments Upon Termination

The following table sets forth the potential payments to each NEO under the terms of their employment agreements and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised solelyequity award agreements described above due to various scenarios as of independent directors. No memberDecember 31, 2022. Amounts shown do not include (a) payment of any unpaid portion of the NEO’s base salary through the effective date of termination, (b) reimbursement for any outstanding reasonable business expense, and (c) any bonus or incentive compensation committee is a current or former officer or employeethat had been accrued through the effective date of ours or any of our subsidiaries. Other than Mr. Eckel’s service both as an executive officertermination but not paid. Amounts shown also do not reflect employment agreements entered into by Messrs. Eckel, Lipson and as a member of our board of director, none of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any company that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.Pangburn, effective March 1, 2023.

Name  Benefit  Without Cause/For Good
Reason / Non-renewal by
Company ($)(1)
  Death ($)  Disability ($)(2)  Change in
Control ($)(3)
  Retirement ($)(5)
Jeffrey W. Eckel Cash 10,910,007 7,743,125 5,218,125 10,910,007 
  Continued Health Benefits 45,155 45,155 45,155 45,155 
  Equity(4) 6,101,246 6,101,246 6,101,246 4,385,659 2,415,512
Jeffrey A. Lipson Cash 2,156,840 1,496,250 1,496,250 2,156,840 
  Continued Health Benefits 45,732   45,732 
  Equity(4) 1,791,949 1,791,949 1,791,949 1,294,739 
Susan D. Nickey Cash 553,255 950,000 950,000 553,255 
  Continued Health Benefits 9,903   9,903 
  Equity(4) 1,250,081 1,250,081 1,250,081 940,372 
Marc T. Pangburn Cash 456,966 950,000 950,000 456,966 
  Continued Health Benefits 30,488   30,488 
  Equity(4) 1,311,142 1,311,142 1,311,142 1,001,433 
Nathaniel J. Rose Cash 1,980,680 1,182,750 1,182,750 1,980,680 
  Continued Health Benefits 60,976 60,976 60,976 60,976 
  Equity(4) 1,810,815 1,810,815 1,810,815 1,316,532 

(1)

This column describes the payments and benefits that become payable if the Company elects not to renew the NEO’s employment agreement, if employment is terminated by the Company without cause, or if employment is terminated by the NEO for good reason.

For Mr. Eckel, the term “cause” means (i) conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony involving moral turpitude, deceit, dishonesty or fraud (but excluding traffic violations) that is injurious to the business or reputation of the Company; (ii) willful and material misconduct in connection with the performance of his duties, including, without limitation, embezzlement or the misappropriation of funds or property of the Company; (iii) failure to adhere to the lawful directions of our board of directors, or to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to the Company, in either event, which continues for a period of 30 business days after written demand for corrective action is delivered by the Company; or (iv) material breach of (x) any covenant contained in the employment agreement; or (y) the other terms and provisions of the employment agreement and, in each case, failure to cure such breach within 10 days following written notice from the Company specifying such breach.

For Messrs. Lipson, Chuslo, Herron, McMahon, Pangburn, and Rose and Ms. Nickey, the term “cause” means the NEO’s (i) commission of, and indictment for or formal admission to, a felony involving moral turpitude, deceit, dishonesty or fraud (but excluding traffic violations); (ii) willful and material misconduct in connection with the performance of the NEO’s duties, including, without limitation, embezzlement or the misappropriation of funds or property of the Company; (iii) failure to adhere to the lawful directions of the CEO, to adhere to the Company’s policies and practices or to devote substantially all of the NEO’s business time and efforts to the Company, which failure continues for a period of 30 business days after written demand for corrective action is delivered by the Company; or (iv) material breach of (x) any covenant contained in the employment agreement; or (y) the other terms and provisions of the employment agreement and, in each case, failure to cure such breach within 10 days following written notice from the Company specifying such breach.

The term “good reason” means (i) any change in job title or material diminution in the NEO’s roles and responsibilities from those set forth in the employment agreements (including, without limitation, the assignment of duties inconsistent with the NEO’s position or, for Mr. Eckel only, no longer being the chair of our board of directors and the senior-most executive of the Company); (ii) a reduction in the NEO’s annual salary or annual bonus potential; (iii) a relocation of the Company’s headquarters outside a 30 mile radius of Annapolis, MD or moving of the NEO’s office or place of performance from the Company’s headquarters; (iv) a material breach by the Company of the employment agreement or any other material agreement between the NEO and the Company; or (v) for Mr. Eckel only, there shall have occurred a change in control. For Messrs. Chuslo, Herron, McMahon, and Rose, following a change in control the definition of good reason set forth is modified to delete all references to the term “material.” For Mr. Lipson, the definition is applicable only following a change in control and does not include references to the term “material.”

(2)The term “disability” means that the NEO has become physically or mentally incapable of performing the duties under the employment agreement and such disability has disabled the NEO for a cumulative period of 180 days within any 12-month period.
(3)The term “change in control” is defined in “—Change in Control” above.
(4)Includes the value of accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards granted to the NEO. The acceleration value of the restricted stock was calculated using the closing price of $28.98 per share on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of 2022. For termination without cause, termination for good reason, non-renewal by the Company, death or disability, the number of performance shares reported is based on the target level of performance. For change in control, the number of performance shares reported is based on the actual level of performance through December 31, 2022.
(5)Refer to “Severance Benefits Payable Upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control” above for details of our Retirement Policy.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  67

CEO Compensation Pay Ratio

COMPENSATION PAY RATIO

We believe our executive compensation program must be internally consistent and equitable to motivate our employees to create stockholder value. We monitor the relationship between the compensation of our executive officers and the compensation of our non-managerial employees. For 2019,As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing disclosure regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of Jeffrey Eckel, our president and chief executive officer during 2022, to that of $5,247,500, as shownour median employee in the Summarytable below.

   HASI
(2022)
CEO Compensation $8,013,744 
Median Employee Compensation $265,484 
CEO to Worker Ratio  30:1 

The CEO Compensation Table above (the “CEO Compensation”), was approximately 21 times the total compensation of the median employee, whose compensation was calculatedis provided in the same manner and was $247,530.

“Summary Compensation Table” above. We identified the median employee using the annual base salary and expected bonus, as of December 31, 2019,2022, plus any long-term incentive equity awards granted in 20192022 for all individuals, excluding our chief executive officer, who were employed by us on December 31, 2019,2022, the last day of our payroll year (whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or seasonal basis). If the median employee’s total compensation was not comparable to the CEO Compensation, for example, because such median employee was hired at the end of the year and thus did not receive long-term incentive equity awards in 2019,2022, we used the next lower employee who was comparable as the median employee. After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our CEO Compensation.

2022 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and Non-PEO NEOs and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown.

          Value of initial fixed $100
investment based on(4):
     
Year Summary
compensation
table total for
PEO ($)(1)
 Compensation
actually paid to
PEO ($)(1, 2, 3)
 Average summary
compensation
table total for non-
PEO NEOs ($)(1)
 Average
compensation
actually paid to
non-PEO NEOs
($)(1, 2, 3)
 Total
shareholder
return
 Peer
group total
shareholder
return
 Net Income
(thousand $)
 Distributable
Earning per
share ($)(5)
 
2022 8,013,744 (977,130) 2,705,951 713,079 100.75 100.69 41,911 2.08 
2021 9,241,605 4,411,821 2,953,807 2,040,073 176.97 134.1 127,346 1.88 
2020 3,998,245 25,869,661 1,658,095 7,764,371 205.95 94.92 82,759 1.55 

(1)Mr. Eckel was our PEO for each year presented. The individuals comprising the Non-PEO NEOs for each year presented are listed below.

2020 2021 2022
Jeffrey A. Lipson Jeffrey A. Lipson Jeffrey A. Lipson
J. Brendan Herron J. Brendan Herron Nathaniel J. Rose
Nathaniel J. Rose Nathaniel J. Rose Susan D. Nickey
Steven L. Chuslo Steven L. Chuslo Marc T. Pangburn
Daniel K. McMahon Daniel K. McMahon  
  Susan D. Nickey  
  Marc T. Pangburn  

(2)The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by the Company’s NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.
(3)Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO and the Non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  68

Year  Summary
Compensation Table
Total for PEO
($)
  Exclusion of Change
in Pension Value
for PEO
($)
  Exclusion of Stock
Awards for PEO
($)
  Inclusion of
Pension Service
Cost for PEO
($)
  Inclusion of Equity
Values for PEO
($)
    Compensation
Actually Paid to PEO
($)
 
2022 8,013,744  (4,430,369)  (4,560,505)(977,130)
2021 9,241,605  (5,857,833)  1,028,050 4,411,821 
2020 3,998,245  (2,385,784)  24,257,200 25,869,661 

Year  Average Summary
Compensation Table
Total for Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Exclusion
of Stock Awards for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
  Average Inclusion
of Pension Service
Cost for Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Inclusion of
Equity Values for Non-
PEO NEOs
($)
  Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
 
2022 2,705,951  (1,112,201)  (880,671)713,079 
2021 2,953,807  (1,586,951)  673,217 2,040,073 
2020 1,658,095  (835,541)  6,941,817 7,764,371 

The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:

Year  Year-End Fair
Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of
Last Day of Year
for PEO
($)
  Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior Year
to Last Day of Year
of Unvested Equity
Awards for PEO
($)
    Vesting-Date Fair
Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year that
Vested During
Year for PEO
($)
  Change in Fair Value
from Last Day of Prior
Year to Vesting Date
of Unvested Equity
Awards that Vested
During Year for PEO
($)
    Fair Value at Last
Day of Prior Year
of Equity Awards
Forfeited During
Year for PEO
($)
  Value of
Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for PEO
($)
  Total - Inclusion of
Equity Values for
PEO
($)
 
2022 2,262,307 (6,165,136) (1,433,346) 775,670 (4,560,505)
2021 5,701,032 (2,907,648) (2,460,600) 695,265 1,028,050 
2020 10,486,926 11,633,770  1,114,284  1,022,220 24,257,200 

Year  Average Year-End
Fair Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year That
Remained Unvested
as of Last Day of
Year for Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Change
in Fair Value from
Last Day of Prior
Year to Last Day of
Year of Unvested
Equity Awards for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
    Average Vesting-
Date Fair Value
of Equity Awards
Granted During
Year that Vested
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
  Average Change
in Fair Value from
Last Day of Prior
Year to Vesting Date
of Unvested Equity
Awards that Vested
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
    Average Fair
Value at Last Day
of Prior Year of
Equity Awards
Forfeited During
Year for Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Value
of Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
  Total - Average
Inclusion of
Equity Values for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
 
2022 567,921 (1,341,806) (235,527) 128,741 (880,671)
2021 1,543,385 (513,005) (548,620) 191,457 673,217 
2020 3,394,119 3,162,358  159,713  225,627 6,941,817 

(4)The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT Index (“FTSE NAREIT All Equity”), which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2022. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the listed year in the Company and in the FTSE NAREIT All Equity, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
(5)We determined Distributable Earnings Per Share to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in 2022. See Item 7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2023, for an explanation of Distributable Earnings, including a reconciliation to the relevant GAAP measure. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for years 2021 and 2020 and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  69

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and our Net Income during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  70

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Distributable Earnings Per Share

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and Distributable Earnings Per Share during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Description of Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR

The following chart compares our cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years to that of the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT Index over the same period.

 

Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures

The following table presents the financial performance measures that the Company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs for 2022 to Company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.

Distributable EPS

TSR

Distributable ROE

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  71
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers and Directors
Back to Contents
In March 2016,

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Under our board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs and directors, which are intended to further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. Under the guidelines, each NEO must hold an ownership stake in the Company that is significant in comparison to their base salary and each director must hold an ownership stake in the Company that is significant in comparison to their base cash retainer.salary. The aggregate value of stock ownership required to be retained is shown below:

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President: six times base salary;
all other NEOs: three times base salary; and
all other directors: five times the cash retainer.
is:

Executive Chair: six times base salary;
Chief Executive Officer and President: six times base salary; and
all other NEOs: three times base salary.

Each NEO and director has five years to comply from the later of the date they become covered under this policy or the date the policy was originally adopted. Until the individual is in compliance, NEOs must retain 50%, and directors must retain 100%, of any equity grants, net of any shares withheld or sold to satisfy taxes. Stock ownership for the purpose of these guidelines includes stock,shares of Common Stock, restricted stock, OP units (includes LTIP units) and unvested OP units (includes LTIP units) held by the covered individual but excluding anyexcludes RSUs. As of April 9, 2020, each

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  72

PROPOSAL NO. 4

STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Act provides our stockholders with an opportunity to vote on a proposal, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, regarding how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, other than Mr. Lipson,Named Executive Officers. By voting on this matter, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on executive compensation every one, two, or three years.

After careful consideration of this proposal, our board of directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for our Company, and eachtherefore our board of directors recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.

In formulating its recommendation, our board of directors other than Mr. Eckhartconsidered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies, and Ms. Lagomarsino, werepractices as disclosed in complianceour annual proxy statement every year. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices. We understand that our stockholders may have different views as to what is the stock ownership guidelines. Eachbest approach for our Company and we look forward to hearing from our stockholders on this proposal.

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of Mr. Lipson, Mr. Eckhartevery year, every two years, or every three years, or abstain from voting.

Our board of directors recommends avote FORthe option of “One” year as the frequency for future advisory votes on compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

REQUIRED VOTE

If a quorum is present, the option of every year, every two years, or every three years that receives a majority of the votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by stockholders. For purposes of this advisory vote, abstentions and Ms. Lagomarsino has until 2024broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. In the event that no option receives a majority of the votes cast, we will consider the option that receives the most votes to achieve compliance.




CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Indemnification Agreements for Officersbe the option selected by stockholders. In either case, this vote is advisory and Directors
We have entered into indemnification agreements with members ofnot binding on us or our board of directors and our board of directors may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and our Company to hold an advisory vote on executive officers. These indemnification agreements provide indemnification to these personscompensation more or less frequently than the option selected by us to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and certain procedures for indemnification, including advancement by us of certain expenses relating to claims brought against these persons under certain circumstances. our stockholders.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  73

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of the Record Date regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) our NEOs as of December 31, 2019, (iii) our directors and (iv) all of our directorsNEOs and NEOsdirectors as a group. Beneficial ownership of our Common Stock includes any shares over which the beneficial owner has sole or shared voting or investment power, any shares that the beneficial owner has the right to acquire within 60 days of such date through the exercise of options or other rights and any shares issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon time-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units.

  
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned 
Name (1)
 Number 
Percent (2)
Named Executive Officers and Directors:    
Jeffrey W. Eckel (3)  
 1,224,274
 1.7%
Jeffrey A. Lipson (4)
 50,799
 *
J. Brendan Herron (5)   
 366,337
 *
Nathaniel J. Rose (6)   
 237,917
 *
Steven L. Chuslo (7)   
 285,039
 *
Daniel K. McMahon (8)   
 195,887
 *
Teresa M. Brenner 18,596
 *
Michael T. Eckhart 8,611
 *
Simone F. Lagomarsino 11,659
 *
Charles M. O’Neil 32,881
 *
Richard J. Osborne 41,881
 *
Steven G. Osgood 38,259
 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)   
 2,512,140
 3.4%
5% or Greater Beneficial Owners:    
The Vanguard Group (9)  
 7,748,462
 11.9%
Wellington Management Group LLP (10)  
 6,132,931
 9.5%
Blackrock, Inc. (11)  
 5,992,722
 9.1%

  Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
As Of April 12, 2023
Name(1) Number Percent(2)
Named Executive Officers and Directors:    
Jeffrey W. Eckel(3) 1,239,030 1.3%
Jeffrey A. Lipson(4) 184,154 *
Susan D. Nickey(5) 109,164 *
Marc T. Pangburn(6) 95,415 *
Nathaniel J. Rose(7) 321,097 *
Lizabeth A. Ardisana 5,947 *
Clarence D. Armbrister 8,706 *
Teresa M. Brenner 27,302 *
Michael T. Eckhart 17,317 *
Nancy C. Floyd 8,706 *
Charles M. O’Neil 38,855 *
Richard J. Osborne 51,587 *
Steven G. Osgood 56,578 *
Kimberly A. Reed 3,441 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons) 2,167,299 2.3%
5% or Greater Beneficial Owners:    
Wellington Management Group LLP(8) 8,542,080 9.1%
The Vanguard Group(9) 8,354,663 8.9%
Blackrock, Inc.(10) 7,050,449 7.5%

*
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
(1)The address for each of the directors and officers named above is 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, Maryland 21401.
(2)As of the Record Date, there were a total of 73,176,60593,640,137 shares of Common Stock and OP units outstanding, which includes 459,571152,672 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock, 281,903221,716 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units, 1,078,681 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of LTIP units to OP units and 356,656redemption of the OP units and 529,246 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon time-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. This amount excludes up to 494,294199,768 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 625,408987,716 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. For the calculation of each holder'sholder’s percentage, the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding used in calculating such percentage assumes that none of the RSUs or OP units (which includes LTIP units convertible into OP units) held by other persons are vested, converted and/or redeemed for shares of Common Stock.
(3)This amount includes 42,00036,900 shares held by the individual’s significant other, 2,536 shares held in trust for the individual'sindividual’s minor relatives, 865,394549,894 shares held by the Jeffrey W. Eckel Revocable Trust of which Mr. Eckel is the sole trustee and beneficiary, 107,661and 67,661 shares held by Chesapeake Power, LLC of which Mr. Eckel is the sole member and 15,000 shares held by Chesapeake Power Foundation, the activities of which Mr. Eckel has the sole ability to direct.member. This amount excludes up to 124,200 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 248,500273,396 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HASI Management HoldCo LLC ("(“HoldCo LLC"LLC”). The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.
(4)This amount excludes 43,500198,752 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.


(5)This amount includes 6,920 shares held by the individual’s spouse and minor children and 135,938excludes up to 65,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  74
(6)This amount excludes up to 51,752 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 103,00068,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.
(6)(7)This amount includes 10,697 shares held by the individual’s spouse. This amount excludes up to 37,952 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 76,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP Units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.
(7)This amount includes 4,7003,000 shares held by the individual’s significant other. This amount excludes up to 32,776 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 65,50093,484 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.
(8)This amount excludes up to 32,776 shares of Common Stock issuable upon performance-based vesting of RSUs and up to 65,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of OP units issuable upon performance-based vesting and conversion of LTIP units. LTIP units included or excluded for this individual are held by HoldCo LLC. The individual is a member of HoldCo LLC. Such LTIP units represent only the number of LTIP units in which the individual has a pecuniary interest in accordance with his or her proportionate interest in HoldCo LLC.
(9)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 12, 2020, The Vanguard4, 2023, Wellington Management Group LLP reported sole voting power with respect to 69,631 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,673,256 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, shared voting power with respect to 15,4037,405,485 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and shared dispositive power with respect to 75,206 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership information, which does not include any shares acquired or sold since the date of such Schedule 13G/A. The percent of Common Stock beneficially owned does not include the impact of any Common Stock issued or equity-based awards granted since the date of the Schedule 13G/A. The Vanguard Group’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(10)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 8, 2020, Wellington Management Group LLP reported shared voting power with respect to 5,370,797 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,132,9318,542,080 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership information, which does not include any shares acquired or sold since the date of such Schedule 13G/A. The percent of Common Stock beneficially owned does not include the impact of any Common Stock issued or equity-based awards granted since the filing date of the Schedule 13G/A. The business address of Wellington Management Group LLP is 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.
(11)(9)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 5, 2020,9, 2023, The Vanguard Group reported sole dispositive power with respect to 8,197,614 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, shared voting power with respect to 67,216 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and shared dispositive power with respect to 157,049 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership information, which does not include any shares acquired or sold since the date of such Schedule 13G/A. The percent of Common Stock beneficially owned does not include the impact of any Common Stock issued or equity-based awards granted since the date of the Schedule 13G/A. The Vanguard Group’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(10)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 3, 2023, BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 5,814,2436,872,592 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,992,7227,050,449 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership information, which does not include any shares acquired or sold since the date of such Schedule 13G/A. The percent of Common Stock beneficially owned does not include the impact of any Common Stock issued or equity-based awards granted since the date of the Schedule 13G/A. BlackRock, Inc.’s address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  75

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS FOR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with members of our board of directors and our executive officers. These indemnification agreements provide indemnification to these persons by us to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and certain procedures for indemnification, including advancement by us of certain expenses relating to claims brought against these persons under certain circumstances.

MEETING INFORMATION

Pursuant to the rules adopted by the SEC, we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, (the “Notice”) to our stockholders of record as of the Record Date. We believe that posting these materials on the Internet enables us to provide stockholders with the information that they need more quickly. It also lowers our costs of printing and delivering these materials and reduces the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. The Notice and this proxy statement summarize the information you need to know to vote by proxy or online during the Annual Meeting via a live webcast.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, which will be conducted solely via a live webcast. By hosting the Annual Meeting online, we are able to communicate more effectively with our stockholders, enable increased attendance and participation from locations around the world, and reduce costs, which aligns with our broader sustainability goals. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. During the upcoming virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares online from any remote location with Internet connectivity. We will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows and we will post the questions and answers from the meeting on the Company’s website promptly thereafter.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time. Online check-in will begin at 9:15 a.m., Eastern time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures.

You may attend the virtual Annual Meeting if you are a stockholder of record, a proxy holder for a stockholder of record, or a beneficial owner of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), with evidence of ownership.

If you are a registered holder of shares of Common Stock, as of the close of business on the Record Date, the Notice was sent directly to you and you may vote your shares of Common Stock during the Annual Meeting by attending via live webcast. If you hold shares of Common Stock in “street name” through a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary, the Notice was forwarded to you by such intermediary and you must follow the instructions provided by such intermediary regarding how to instruct such intermediary to vote your shares of Common Stock.

Shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies received by us prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted according to the instructions specified on such proxies. Any stockholder of record submitting a proxy retains the power to revoke such proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our secretary at Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., 1 Park Place, Suite 200, Annapolis, MD 21401 prior to the Annual Meeting, (ii) submitting a later dated proxy or (iii) voting online during the meeting via live webcast. Attending the Annual Meeting via webcast will not automatically revoke a stockholder’s previously submitted proxy unless such stockholder votes online during the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name and you desire to vote online during the virtual Annual Meeting, you should request instructions from your bank, broker or other holder of record to be able to participate in or vote at the meeting.

You may attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote your shares during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023 by using your 16-digit control number as the password and following the instructions provided to vote. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for the check in.

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting during the check-in time or meeting time, or you have any questions regarding how to use the virtual meeting platform, please call the technical support number posted on the virtual shareholder meeting log-in page.

If your shares are held in street name and you desire to change your vote, you should contact the nominee holding shares for you (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) for instructions on how to do so. If a proxy is properly authorized without specifying any voting instructions and not revoked prior to the Annual Meeting, the shares of Common Stock represented by such proxy will be voted (1) FOR the election of the nominees

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  76

named in this proxy statement as directors, to serve on our board of directors until our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (2) FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, (3) FOR the approval of a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of our NEOs as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in this proxy statement and (4) FOR the option of “One” year frequency for future advisory votes on compensation of our Named Executive Officers. If you hold your shares in street name and do not give the nominee holding shares for you (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) specific voting instructions on the election of directors, the non-binding advisory vote to approve our executive compensation or the approval of the 2022 Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, your shares will not be voted on these items, and a broker non-vote will occur. Broker non-votes and abstentions are each included in the determination of the number of shares of Common Stock present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but will have no effect on the voting results for any of the proposals. As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

This proxy statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the related proxy card are first being made available to stockholders on or about April 19, 2023.

ANNUAL REPORT

This proxy statement is accompanied by our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on February 21, 2023.

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

Stockholders will be entitled to cast one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record at the close of business on the Record Date with respect to (i) the election of eight directors to serve on our board of directors until our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, (iii) a non-binding advisory resolution approving compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in this proxy statement, (iv) a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation and (v) any other proposal for stockholder action that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.

Stockholders who instruct their proxy to abstain should know that abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of stockholders present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) returns a properly-executed proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because such nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular matter and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the only item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting with respect to which such nominee will be permitted to exercise voting discretion is the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Therefore, if you hold your shares in street name and do not give the nominee specific voting instructions on the election of directors, the non-binding advisory resolution approving our executive compensation or the non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation, your shares will not be voted on these items, and a broker non-vote will occur. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the voting results for any of the proposals.

The presence, by attending online during the Annual Meeting via webcast or by proxy, of holders of Common Stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum. The disposition of business scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present, will require the following affirmative votes:

for the election of a director, a plurality of all the votes cast in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting,
for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, a majority of all the votes cast on the proposal,
for the approval of the non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, a majority of all the votes cast on the proposal, and
for the non-binding vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation, every one, two or three years, a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  77

We have a majority vote policy for the election of directors. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to tender his or her resignation to our board of directors. The NGCR Committee is required to promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. Our board of directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participate in the NGCR Committee’s consideration or board action regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation. The policy is more fully described above in the “Proposal No.1 Election of Directors—Majority Vote Policy” section of this proxy statement.

If any nominee named in this proxy statement is unwilling or unable to serve as a director, our board of directors may nominate another individual for election as a director at the Annual Meeting, and the persons named as proxy holders will vote for the election of any substitute nominee.

The votes on compensation and the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation are advisory and not binding on our board of directors. However, our board of directors and the Compensation Committee value all stockholder feedback and will consider the outcome of the votes in reviewing executive compensation. With respect to the vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation, in the event that no option receives a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, we will consider the option that receives the most votes to be the option selected by stockholders.

OTHER MATTERS

Our board of directors knows of no other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting. The proxies for the Annual Meeting confer discretionary authority on the persons named therein as proxy holders to vote on any matter proposed by stockholders for consideration at the Annual Meeting. As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

OUTSTANDING SHARES

As of April 12, 2023, we had issued and outstanding 91,810,494 shares of Common Stock (which includes 152,672 shares of unvested restricted Common Stock).

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any stockholder intending to present a proposal at our 2021an annual meeting of stockholders and have the proposal included in the proxy statement and proxy card for such meeting (pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act) must, in addition to complying with the applicable laws and regulations governing submissions of such proposals, submit the proposal in writing to us no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on December 15, 2020, but in no event earlier than November 15, 2020,21, 2023 and must otherwise be in compliance with the requirements of the SEC’s proxy rules.

Our Bylaws currently provide that any stockholder intending to nominate a director or present a stockholder proposal of other business for consideration at the 20212024 annual meeting of stockholders, but not intending for such a nomination or proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting (i.e., not pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act), must notify us in writing no earlier than the 150thday and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the 120thday prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting with respect to which such notice is to be tendered is not held within 30 days before or after the anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders, to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be received no earlier than the 150thday and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the 120thday prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders, as originally convened, or the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Accordingly, to submitnominate a director candidate for considerationelection or present a stockholder proposal of other business for nominationconsideration at our 20212024 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders must submit the recommendation,nomination or proposal, in writing, by 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on December 15, 2020,21, 2023, but in no event earlier than November 15, 2020.21, 2023.

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  78

In addition to satisfying the foregoing advance notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules under the Exchange Act stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to Steven L. Chuslo, our general counsel, executive vice president, chief legal officer and secretary, at Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., 1906 Towne Centre Blvd,1 Park Place, Suite 370,200, Annapolis, Maryland 21401, and, to the extent applicable, must include the information and other materials required by our Bylaws.

Our board of directors know of no other matters or business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their discretion on any such matters. The persons named in the enclosed proxy may also, if they deem it advisable, vote such proxy to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time.



MISCELLANEOUS

We are bearing all costs associated with the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. This solicitation is being made primarily through the Internet and by mail but may also be made by our directors, executive officers and employees by telephone, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, Internet, mail or personal interview. No additional compensation will be given to our directors, executive officers or employees for this solicitation. Stockholders sharing an address will each receive a single copy of the notice of internet availability. We will request brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other intermediaries who hold shares of Common Stock in their names to furnish proxy materials to beneficial owners of such shares and will reimburse such brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other intermediaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners.

A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (FILED WITH THE SEC AND THE NYSE), WHICH CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT US, IS AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE TO ANY STOCKHOLDER. REQUESTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO INVESTOR RELATIONS AT HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC., 1906 TOWNE CENTRE BLVD,1 PARK PLACE, SUITE 370,200, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401.

Annapolis, Maryland
April 19, 2023      
By Order of our Board of Directors,

/s/ Steven L. Chuslo
Steven L. Chuslo
Secretary

HASI  |  2023 PROXY STATEMENT|  79
 
/s/ Jeffrey W. EckelBack to Contents
Jeffrey W. Eckel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Annapolis, Maryland

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRA CAPTL
1 PARK PLACE, SUITE 200
ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401

April 14, 2020



ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
June 4, 2020
9:30 a.m.

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time

GO GREEN
e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy
material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and
paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL
The Notice of Meeting, annual report to stockholders, proxy statement and proxy card are available at:
http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/18257
Please sign, the day before the cut-off date and mailor meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the envelope provided as soon as possible.
Please detach along perforated lineweb site and mailfollow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW, AND “FOR” ITEMS 2 AND 3. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE   ý
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
V09936-P88502KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRA CAPTLFor
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW, “FOR” ITEMS 2 AND 3, AND “1 YEAR” FOR ITEM 4.
1.The election as directors of all of the Nominees ornominees (or the individual nominees listed below except as marked to the contrary below):    
 ALL NOMINEESFOR ALL NOMINEES
Jeffrey W. Eckel   
Teresa M. BrennerWITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES
Michael T. Eckhart
Simone F. LagomarsinoFOR ALL EXCEPT (See Instructions below)
Charles M. O’Neil
Richard J. Osborne
INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "FOR ALL EXCEPT" and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold as shown here:
Steven G. Osgood   
  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN 
01)  Jeffrey W. Eckel07)   Jeffrey A. Lipson
02)Lizabeth A. Ardisana08)   Charles M. O’Neil
03)  Clarence D. Armbrister09)   Richard J. Osborne
04)  Teresa M. Brenner10)   Steven G. Osgood
05)  Michael T. Eckhart11)   Kimberly A. Reed
06)  Nancy C. Floyd
ForAgainstAbstain
2.The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2023. 
3.The advisory approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative disclosure in thisthe proxy statement. 
1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
4.The frequency in years with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on executive compensation pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
5.The transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.    
The undersigned acknowledges receipt from Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. before the execution of this proxy of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and a Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference, and the 20192022 Annual Report to Stockholders.
If this Proxy is properly executed, the votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast (i) as directed or, if no direction is given, will be cast “FOR” the election of all of the nominees listed herein, and “FOR” items 2 and 3 and (ii)“1 YEAR” for item 4 and in the discretion of the Proxy holders on any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
I plan to attend the Annual Meeting via live webcast at http://web.lumiagm.com/259337958 (password: hannon2020)    
      
   
 To change the address on your account, please check the box at the right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.  ☐
Note:
Signature of Stockholder   Date:  Signature of Stockholder  Date: 


   Note:
Please sign exactly as your name or names appearappear(s) on this Proxy and date. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
 
  
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.

June 7, 2023

9:30 a.m. Eastern Time

GO GREEN

e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy
material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and
paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access.

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL

The Notice of Meeting, Annual Report to Stockholders, Proxy Statement and Proxy Card are available at: www.proxyvote.com.

Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided

V09937-P88502

1906 Towne Centre Blvd., Ste. 370

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
1 Park Place, Suite 200
Annapolis, MD 21401


THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned stockholder of Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“the CompanyCompany”), hereby appoints Steven L. Chuslo and Jeffrey W. Eckel,A. Lipson, or either of them, as proxies for the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held via a live webcast at http://web.lumiagm.com/259337958(password: hannon2020) www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HASI2023 on June 4, 2020,7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time,Time, to cast on behalf of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast at such meeting, and any postponement or adjournment thereof, and otherwise to represent the undersigned at the meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if personally present at the meeting or otherwise attending online. The undersigned revokes any proxy previously given with respect to the meeting.

IF THIS PROXY IS PROPERLY EXECUTED, THE VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST BY THE UNDERSIGNED WILL BE CAST AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE CAST “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD, "FOR”“FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY'SCOMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020, AND "FOR"2023, “FOR” THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.OFFICERS AND FOR “1 YEAR” FREQUENCY WITH WHICH STOCKHOLDERS ARE PROVIDED AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. THIS PROXY ALSO DELEGATES DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)



- 50 -